Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

WEAKEN

hihihi9993hihihi9993 Member
in General 342 karma

I just wanted to make sure my idea on weaken is correct.
Let's say we are given A-->B....
.
Can I Say "A(O) B(X) = Even when A was present, B did not appear" and "A(X) B(O) = Even when A didn't happen, B still did appear" to weaken [A --> B] ??????????

Comments

  • acsimonacsimon Alum Member
    1269 karma

    First, distinguish the material conditional "if...,then" from a straight causal statement. Sometimes "if..., then" statements express causal claims in English, but sometimes they don't (ex. "If I don't get above 170, then I'm not as good as JY at the LSAT"--not a causal claim). But the arrow --> usually is interpreted as a material conditional.

    Second, you seem to be really talking about causal claims. Take one: A causes B.

    This claim would be weakened if:

    (1) A occurred without B occurring (I thought it caused B?)

    (2) B occurs but A didn't (so something else causes?)

    (3) B occurs before A (so backward causation is possible?)

    (4) B and A occur at the same time (so, are they both caused by some third thing, C?)

    (5) The evidence for A causes B relies on a small number of observations, fudges data, etc. (so I should be skeptical of the data that is supposed to support the claim?)

    These are all the sorts of things which can go wrong with a causal claim. If you find an answer choice that does any one of these sorts of things with regard to a weaken question involving a causal statement, pick it!

    A.c.S

  • hihihi9993hihihi9993 Member
    342 karma

    @acsimon Thank you so much! This is so helpful!!!! :)

  • hihihi9993hihihi9993 Member
    342 karma

    Ah. the correlation and causation lessons.... I need to revisit them!

Sign In or Register to comment.