(In/Out game) OR questions!

Comments

• 1 Like

  akistotle Member ⭐ 🍌🍌

  December 2017 9382 karma

  @d931n027h said:
  TWO QUESTIONS TO ASK! Thank you in advance!

  1) Let's say I want to find all "OR pairs" within /N->/O->J->/K->P. Is the following list a complete "OR pairs":
  /N->P
  /O->P
  /K->P
  /N->J
  /O->J

  I think this is ok.

  2) If we are given /N->/O->J in IN/OUT game,is it okay to represent this as N/O/J in one slot of IN group?

  I think you shouldn't represent it that way.

  N/O/J looks like if N is in the IN group, O and J are free to go anywhere. But it isn't the case here.
• hihihi9993 Member

  December 2017 347 karma

  @akistotle said:

  @d931n027h said:
  TWO QUESTIONS TO ASK! Thank you in advance!

  1) Let's say I want to find all "OR pairs" within /N->/O->J->/K->P. Is the following list a complete "OR pairs":
  /N->P
  /O->P
  /K->P
  /N->J
  /O->J

  I think this is ok.

  2) If we are given /N->/O->J in IN/OUT game,is it okay to represent this as N/O/J in one slot of IN group?

  I think you shouldn't represent it that way.

  N/O/J looks like if N is in the IN group, O and J are free to go anywhere. But it isn't the case here.

  If /A->B, we would represent that as A/B in IN group though... Right?
  Then @akistotle, how would you represent it? N/O and O/J in IN group??

  (Thank you always!)
• 1 Like

  akistotle Member ⭐ 🍌🍌

  December 2017 9382 karma

  @d931n027h said:

  @akistotle said:

  @d931n027h said:
  TWO QUESTIONS TO ASK! Thank you in advance!

  1) Let's say I want to find all "OR pairs" within /N->/O->J->/K->P. Is the following list a complete "OR pairs":
  /N->P
  /O->P
  /K->P
  /N->J
  /O->J

  I think this is ok.

  2) If we are given /N->/O->J in IN/OUT game,is it okay to represent this as N/O/J in one slot of IN group?

  I think you shouldn't represent it that way.

  N/O/J looks like if N is in the IN group, O and J are free to go anywhere. But it isn't the case here.

  If /A->B, we would represent that as A/B in IN group though... Right?
  Then @akistotle, how would you represent it? N/O and O/J in IN group??

  (Thank you always!)

  For /N->/O->J, I would just represent O/J in the IN slot and write O --> N closer to it. You can't write "N/O and O/J in IN group" because N and O don't have OR relationship.

  Even if they do (if the rule said /N --> O, /O --> J), I would represent only O/J in the IN slot because if you write N/O and O/J, they take up two slots, and you may miss the case where O is in and N and J are out.
• 1 Like

  saberati Alum Member

  December 2017 94 karma

  I'd probably do J/O* to remind me that O in is N in
• hihihi9993 Member

  December 2017 347 karma

  @akistotle said:

  @d931n027h said:

  @akistotle said:

  @d931n027h said:
  TWO QUESTIONS TO ASK! Thank you in advance!

  1) Let's say I want to find all "OR pairs" within /N->/O->J->/K->P. Is the following list a complete "OR pairs":
  /N->P
  /O->P
  /K->P
  /N->J
  /O->J

  I think this is ok.

  2) If we are given /N->/O->J in IN/OUT game,is it okay to represent this as N/O/J in one slot of IN group?

  I think you shouldn't represent it that way.

  N/O/J looks like if N is in the IN group, O and J are free to go anywhere. But it isn't the case here.

  If /A->B, we would represent that as A/B in IN group though... Right?
  Then @akistotle, how would you represent it? N/O and O/J in IN group??

  (Thank you always!)

  For /N->/O->J, I would just represent O/J in the IN slot and write O --> N closer to it. You can't write "N/O and O/J in IN group" because N and O don't have OR relationship.

  Even if they do (if the rule said /N --> O, /O --> J), I would represent only O/J in the IN slot because if you write N/O and O/J, they take up two slots, and you may miss the case where O is in and N and J are out.

  Your way sounds superb. Thank you!
• hihihi9993 Member

  December 2017 347 karma

  @saberati said:
  I'd probably do J/O* to remind me that O in is N in

  *! Another great way! Thank you!!!