It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Hey, guys. Why is there talk of three M here when the rules say exactly two M? JY mentions three M and others also mentioned in the comments section. What am I missing here? Three M was never an option for me becatse of that rule.
Comments
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-57-section-1-game-4/
Could you tell us when he talks about three Ms in the video?
@akistotle 3:24. I don’t understand why three M was even mentioned.
I see. I think he's saying this to show that there cannot be three of any item. (There cannot be three Ws) But I think he picked the wrong item because as you said, we already know there are exactly two Ms.
I don't know if he ever sees this post, but I'm tagging him to see if my hypothesis above is correct....@"J.Y. Ping"
@akistotle cool beans! Thx!
Yup, it's what @akistotle said. I should have used a different item to illustrate the point.
Now that I'm looking at this game again, I wonder if a chart would have been a better setup to use.
Thank you for the clarification! Others mentioned a chart too. I used the same setup as you. I’m going to go back and try the chart now.
Does this help at all?
https://photos.app.goo.gl/DrXoXXSyFKG4VsrJ3
This game is difficult. I'd be happy to answer any questions.
@goingfor99th thank you! this game was hard for me but I ended up only missing #23. I haven’t done the game again but I’ll refer to yours when I do. I ended up splitting on the M and creating three boards.