i think I understand now thank you. In one of the negations you posted for the marathon example, "It is not the case the faster runner sometimes wins the marathon". If however one of the answer choices was The faster runner wins the marathon, the …
It seems as if that based on the premises, the negation of the example answer choices make it impossible to draw out a conclusion from the premises. If it is never the case that the faster runner wins the marathon or the case that Bill will break hi…
so the premise does not have to make the conclusion impossible for a negation to wreck the argument? It just has to at least make the existence of a premise cause a person to have a "so what" expression" in regards to the strength of support to conc…
Also if I think too hard about irrelevant answer choices, I may get that answer right on that problem but my thought process gets disrupted due to mental exhaustion on the questions that come after even on blind review.
Ill definitely try my best to embed the 21 common argument flaws in my head. I definintely understand what the flaws are talking about. But the application of those flaws have been tough in a timed setting. I guess that will come with more practice
Unless the flaw questions are sufficiency necessity confusions which for some reason, my comfort zone. (not sure why). But some of the other questions with convoluted answer choices seem to be confusing. For the flaw questions I have been doing, th…
thank you. I think the problem is that in a blind review setting,the amount of analysis Ive been doing to answer a flaw question correct works. But in a timed setting, I cannot analyize the answer choices and the questions fast enough. The flaw does…