Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
NNNNJJJJ
About
- Username
- NNNNJJJJ
- Joined
- Visits
- 126
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
I will get a 173 or higher on the September LSAT!
-
following
-
@"If Glory then Guts" Thank you for such a detailed and thoughtful comment. I updated my post to clarify that my goal score is 175+. So I made sure to read through your first paragraph multiple times. I definitely realize that my lack of understand…
-
what do we do if we want to use the old features, like being able to take any section / question? (what if we want to solve problems that we haven't seen before?)
-
It's absolutely worth foolproofing them. Apparently they're making a comeback on very recent tests. You can focus on the misc games where JY doesn't explicitly say "you won't see this anymore." i.e. PT 1-10 are less important than 11-35, probably. …
-
Different reasons for different sections, in my experience. LG: I might not be the most efficient on easy games, leaving me with less-than-enough time for hard LGs. Or I might panic when I see a miscellaneous LG just because it's unfamiliar. LR: t…
-
Attack MBT answer choices targeting only determinate elements. Attack CBT answer choices targeting only indeterminate items elements. @"5Fennel LSAT" could you please clarify what you mean by "determinate" and "indeterminate"?
-
Interested!
-
who are some people we can list for the contact info of "someone who might be able to verify some of this information"? A friend? Professor?? A professional reference/supervisor?
-
@"C_S_D 01" said: I misunderstood for the last few months and thought that the "simulate Modern" feature meant that this was the current way LSAT was being administered. I did not understand that it was no longer being administered in only 3 …
-
following