Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
LSATdogfml
About
- Username
- LSATdogfml
- Joined
- Visits
- 59
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
@mimimimi is on to something here. This question gets you on a very minute detail but it is there. The stimulus says that kids who completed the program showed INCREASED performance in everything. Therefore chess playing CAUSES increase in academic…
-
I got that question wrong too but dude your level of overthinking is insane
-
Never did this but it sounds like a cool idea. Do all the Passage A only questions before your memory get's contaminated with Passage B. And since a single passage is so short, the odds of getting all the Passage A questions right are in your favour…
-
I limited the answer to A and E. But ended up choosing E (more white glass were made than were Han Purple) because this would mean that white glass wasn't discovered fortuitously during the making of Han Purple. LOL a lot of the times it's only af…
-
I'm crossing my fingers on that experimental being a LG for Oct. Wish us luck
-
@c.janson35 yes I think so too. But since OP successfully induced my paranoia, Imma try to figure this out. All because = solely because. Sounds like sufficient condition to me. The presentation, however, can be made more clear. I.E. All because of…
-
I started practicing timed right from the start to get a feel of how much time I have + not developing bad habits of drooling over questions. In your case dude I think you might be better off postponing the exam and do time management from the very …
-
LG got easier and LRs got trickier. RC stayed RC. That's my take.
-
Btw taking the 72nd tomorrow. I'll come back and comment after I'm done.
-
@allergic Oh my dear 7sage brotherenth, I have envy and respect pouring out of my nostrils for you right now
-
@alexandergreene93 That's how you measure the difficulty of an item in metrics, the percentage of people who get it right vs. the percentage of people who get it wrong. But you're right I'm banking on 7sagers being a reliable sample though
-
Also answer D is reverse logic. Agriculture requires knowledge of natural processes. True. If Agriculture --> SNP But having SNP alone does not necessitate agriculture. So it's logically incorrect to say that non-agriculture societies didn't s…
-
17. People cannot devote themselves to the study of natural processes unless they have leisure, and people have leisure when resources are plentiful, not when resources are scarce. Although some anthropologists claim that agriculture, the cultivatio…
-
pass-me-downs from upperclassmen. Didn't spend a dime. But now i gotta go find PT 74 and 75
-
Not sure about other stuff, but in the 60+ PTs a major change from previous ones is that the 2 LR sections are no longer the same difficulty as each other. Before, especially in the 40s I found that each LR section in one PT is independent of a diff…
-
I was doing one a day (weekends off so 5 per week) for many weeks and it increases both your score and endurance. That is for sure. You start to get a feel for the questions and the trend. Especially for LR I found that at the end of the week I was …
-
AHH an MSS question. Those always get me. Lets figure this beech out. Scientist examined diamonds that were formed on Earth about 2.9 billion years ago. These diamonds had a higher-than-normal concentration of sulfur-33. This concentration can be e…
-
@nicole.hopkins had two month to study and only a little over a month to practice actual questions. Figured that's the only way to finish enough preptests. LOL foolish foolish decision. Don't do what I did everyone. DON'T.
-
I'm in the same boat brah albeit doing a lot worse than you. I was PTing with an average on 171, fluctuating between 170 to 177, and BRing at 177-179. I was doing one PT a day since I started because I was short on time. Last week I had my last PT i…
-
I was doing a PT a day and dropped 10 points. It's been a week and I'm still not back in the 170s. HALP guys