I'm interested in being of assistance too. I'd like to swap, but mine isn't anywhere near ready. PM me if you'd like and when the time comes, I'll get you mine as well.
Excuse me if this was made explicitly clear already, but it sounds like some people are presented with options, which require a response within a certain amount of time, and others are presented with an approval, which then informs them that roughly…
I don't really know what to say to help, but I appreciate that you shared this. I'm gearing up for my 2nd take and I wonder the same thing. The right question to ask yourself may instead be, how many times are you willing to get back up and try agai…
My initial concern with this arose when they allegedly cited law school professor's complaints as a reason why they would add this section. That seemed uncharacteristic of them. But if any of you know this to actually be characteristic of them, then…
I'd wondered this as well. The responses here already sum it up well, though. For me, I track all the LG I've done on a spreadsheet, and then practice those till I master them. Once I've done that, I try to avoid using the PT that it came from as a …
I'm in Tempe and would love to study with y'all. @stepharizona and I are both prepping for June 2016. I work a lot, so my studying happens a little in the evenings and mainly on the weekends. What about you?
I agree with @Pacifico that one should finish their BR before moving on to another PT. I know how tempting it can be since, in relation to BR, a PT can be more exciting. Testing your 100-yard dash for time is often more exciting than watching the vi…
Thanks everyone! That was very helpful. As my first BR group, it's provided me with a lot of lessons. I look forward to doing another now that I know the format.
No problem. There's a fine line between nitpicking and pointing out important details, and I know as a moderator these things can be very annoying, so just know that it was the latter. Thanks for getting these things going.
I see that the discussion forum title says that this is for PT48, but the heading right above the GoToMeeting link says it's PT46 (Saturday, Feb 20th at 8PM ET: PT46). To be clear, this is for 48, right?
@TOLedo2016 I also really enjoy the Thinking LSAT podcast. It's perfect for keeping my mind on the subject matter while doing things that prohibit me from actively studying.
@runniggyrun thanks for helping to clarify that for everyone. My use of X(insert modifier) was supposed to come across as X+x's modifier-->, not just X alone. Likewise for the other examples. Regardless, this is a mistake in clarity, which can be…
I think the issue with your "the only" is that it's missing elements, at least with the example you provided with "The only human being can have souls." If it said, "The only human beings who can have souls are X(whatever modifier you want)." it wou…