Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
kolerv9923-1
About
- Username
- kolerv9923-1
- Joined
- Visits
- 17
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
@cat_person said: Any instincts on what the curve will be? gonna guess -8 for the saturday test, at least the one i saw.
-
i would like to be added!
-
People have to re-take and stuff this week, so after that.
-
I'm interested for some tips on perfecting LR and getting better on RC!
-
So these videos will not be instantly uploaded? I would have to find time to attend them live since I am looking to test in October?
-
@"Tajira McCoy" said: Hi @ltg25, thank you for your question! Former admissions officer here. Is it worth the agony? It depends. The median isn't the top reportable number that law schools have to report to the ABA and US News––the 75th percen…
-
For strengthening, do you feel like the same applies? Or do you think strengthening questions use less formulaic stuff like that? And I can't tell if all weaken questions do what you've described, but I feel like you're right on with that. I feel l…
-
This is really good stuff and I only thought about this earlier when I was looking at specific weaken questions that dealt with a survey. I found that the answer choice was something that said the survey wasn't reliable. Could you further explain …
-
@"baumer.ian" sorry I meant PT79 S4 Q17
-
@"baumer.ian" to be more specific, I was doing PT79 S1 Q7. I thought the first sentence was a causation but I don't know the more I look at it, there were other things I'm confused about this question. Like, how do we go from "hindering financial …
-
@KevinLuminateLSAT said: The short answer to your question is yes, everything the argument assumes is a necessary assumption. I think the confusing issue you're running into is one of the big downsides to calling something a "sufficient a…
-
interested!
-
interested!