Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
natemanwell1
About
- Username
- natemanwell1
- Joined
- Visits
- 88
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
you have to learn the full technique for solving strengthen questions. step one: know what your intention is [close the gap as much as possible preferably from both sides, or the weaker side, or the stronger side] 2) figure out if any answer choices…
-
yeah so if you have the time to start studying that early I would definitely spend a lot of time building the fundamentals outside the test. the test is essentially mostly a reading test with some logic thrown if. if you have really high reading ski…
-
-2 is 100% luck. I think people have this mistaken idea that if their scores fluctuates, it means that they should be scoring at the top end of this range all the time, and they should never score at the bottom of the range. in reality, this idea is…
-
got to learn the content. how to answer the question types and, what the wrong answer and right answer types are. doesn't seem like you know them yet so taking more tests rn is pretty worthless tbh
-
yes. it doesn't make sense to take tests without knowing the material on the test.
-
It's impossible to give any meaningful advice without knowing how you have been studying. but if you're still in there 140s after months of studying, something is clearly going wrong. if you're stuck there, I would assume that the issue is lack of f…
-
just use the PDF
-
doesn't really matter because you'll have to take it again
-
force yourself to focus.
-
Ok so the issue that you are having is definitely neither stamina nor timing issues. What is actually going on is that the lsat has a range of content that it tests, so not everything is tested on every test: when a test contains mostly material you…
-
They do not hide the conclusion. I've never seen that happen. If you don't see the conclusion, that means you don't understand the argument. No keywords are necessary to see the conclusion of the argument. I'm not sure what you mean you "struggle to…
-
Please post how you are approaching these questions. People on the forum cannot give you targeted advice without knowing your process, as on the face of it, this question does not make any sense-are you generally unable to do the questions in a reas…
-
It's totally impossible to understand your question without knowing the scores you got on both test. Did you go from a 178 to a 176 or a 142 to a 140? If you look at the LSAT score bands, there is usually about a 6 point spread, so it is essentially…
-
Go through super prep 1 and 2. Only official source of lsat test answers and guide to the test. Not looking at what the test makers want you to do at the beginning of the studying is insane, otherwise you would not know explicitly what they want you…
-
yes it includes the questions. 8 X 4 = 32, so that would leave 3/4 minutes per each passage's set of questions if it were just the reading time
-
not sure what you mean. the experimental section is the section that is on unscored. all sections on every official available lsat test are scored.
-
I mean it only takes 1/2 an hour so why not just do it
-
yeah that approach doesn't make any sense. saying "the approach to solving flaw questions is to find a flaw" is an exact restatement of the phrase "find the flaw." there are two ways to solve this type of question. the first is to find the intuitive…
-
well yeah if you're studying to meet the median and are below the gpa median then obviously you won't get in. meet the 75th percentile.
-
you can't have a main point that is stronger than what the passage says. that doesn't make any sense, because a main point question's purpose is to describe the thesis or most essential part of a thesis of a passage, and any question in reading comp…
-
most means largest, or greater than 50%, or it means the greatest amount from a set. if you're having trouble with this, I would highly recommend making your way through some other resources. not sure why there would be an expectation that formal lo…
-
don't take a diagnostic test. one of the worst mistakes people make. taking a diagnostic without learning the material first is a surefire way to score terribly. but click on the test then click quick view
-
every answer will be a sufficient condition. chain out the arguments and you'll see it. "It always rains when it is cloudy, therefore today is cloudy." R => C, we have C, so R makes C happen.
-
well that problem is not an issue with "efficiency." that word means work/time, so the same amount of work in less time is more efficient. but if you got the same amount of work done in less time, you would still be getting 50% wrong, so that wouldn…
-
yeah so that doesn't make any sense you can't understand the theory and strategy if you're getting a lot of questions wrong. what the theory is for strengthener is (general strategy: close the gap most on nets preferably from both sides, if not from…
-
if you take a practice once per week, are scoring in the low 160s (meaning you are getting about 25 question wrong), and spending the rest of your time drilling, it sounds like you have basically no time to review. I would say stop drilling and just…
-
I don't think its about how many times you take the test, its about how effective your studying is in between the tests.
-
If you're not shooting for perfection, you're gonna leave a lot of material unlearned and that's gonna give you a big risk cause you essentially have no margin for error if you're going for your target score. I think the core curriculum is a bit ove…
-
I know some people like Loophole but I found it way overcomplicated without really giving any technique for the arguments so I would avoid that. Buy Superprep I and II and work through those.
-
if you're asking 15 people for recommendations, that seems to indicate that you're in search of someone who could strongly support you, rather than having strong candidates right off the bat. the declining due to only being online seems like a red-h…