Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
rzee0913
About
- Username
- rzee0913
- Joined
- Visits
- 314
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
For future test takers: make sure you have LSAC's LSAT helpline number accessible somewhere if you run into technical difficulties during or at the end of the test. My proctor told me to try ending the test session and restarting it which was TERRIB…
-
Hello, my understanding of this problem is as follows: Since this is a PSAr question, we first need to identify an existing 'gap' between the premise and the main conclusion. The stimulus states that if external forces intervene to give a community…
-
Absolutely! To weaken an argument, the answer has to undermine the main conclusion somehow, which only E does. C is an additional consideration which doesn't weaken the specific conclusion that it must be the government to provide money for supercom…
-
Hey, my interpretation is as follows: the argument's main conclusion is that the government should provide the money for the networks. Given that this is a weakening question, the correct answer should make this conclusion questionable, so we're pro…
-
There's actually a lesson on this in the core curriculum: https://7sage.com/lesson/logical-reasoning-general-approach/
-
Congrats! Breaking into the 160s is amazing but doing it with a 165 is even better
-
@"Matt Sorr" said: If I understand correctly, grouping with sequencing games are primarily set up as grouping games, but within the groups you may have to sequence some game pieces. For instance, you may have to choose whether a piece goes int…