Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
iiiSpoon
About
- Username
- iiiSpoon
- Joined
- Visits
- 507
- Last Active
- Roles
- Inactive ⭐
Comments
-
@mlstuard94 I try not to think if they were easy or not. I made the mistake last time because I breezed through the LR and RC yet came out under-performing. . .I don't want to get ahead of myself again by saying whether or not I found it easy. Defi…
-
And another thing, I'm finding myself relying on POE a lot more than before. Some of the newer AC's for LR and RC are just so weak that at first glance they make you hesitate. In older PT's, I never found myself in that situation; it was always, "Yu…
-
@abdelmalak17 my nerves got to me; I had a slip on G1 that ended taking up more time and nothing was smooth after that.
-
@sweezyseason what DEC_LSAT said. Just relax; maybe review a little if that's what helps you. But you are as ready as ready can be, and you'll have plenty of time to freak out just before the test and afterwards, so don't fret now.
-
You honestly need 1. Just 1. Though I suggest 2 just in case you snap 1 out of frustration.
-
Hey, I'm in the cesspool with you. 3rd take, and I dropped the ball on LG. Felt like I was gonna cry and make a scene until a girl beat me to the punch and bawled her eyes out. Not exaggerating; I mean REALLY bawling her eyes out. How really? Carly …
-
@abdelmalak17 I can tell you what's gonna put me down. . .LG. I choked. . .again!
-
Sorry to beat the dead horse, but I honestly think focusing on LR is the best since 50% of the test is LR and it's got better carry over to RC since RC is essentially one giant LR question. As for LG, it has been really hit and miss for a lot of peo…
-
I honestly feel like there is a difference. Let's not talk about the old ones because those are just weird. With in the newer one's, which I feel start at around 72 and onward, the LR and RC rely more on details, ie specific wording, so, we really n…
-
@xrssa89 so you know if the LR sections are randomized too, that being what is 134 for you might be my 431? I had 134 too for LR but section 1 seemed so much more difficult than 3 and 4 for me, though 4 took me the longest because I was absolutely N…
-
@JCooper5 It will absolutely help. I once made a complaint because the test centre did not turn on the heat until the test started. . .so by the time the room actually got decently warm, the test was over. I still remember the guy on my left in his …
-
@vlj1994 That's how it was for me too.
-
I'm gonna butt in and talk about something else, not about the test itself but the centre. At my test centre, the ratio of men to women was like 1:4; my room was like 1:5/6. I lol'd hard when the lineup to use the woman's washroom went around the c…
-
By any chance, is there any recording of the last one with him?
-
Depending on the school, many care only about results. I believe for Yale, you could be scoring all over the place, going from 160 to 145 to 167 to 158 and finally 179; in the end, they take your highest into consideration. If you're looking at a sc…
-
@i.pollock it never hurts to start early, but it may bite you in the butt if you start late. Considering you're thinking about starting with the fundamentals, I say start asap since you might have to break some habits, which takes longer than learn…
-
Funny how I didn't get the inferences for G4 until I went home, still remembering the game rules, and figured out the entirety of the gameboard in one minute. . .amazing the difference a testing setting can do to the mind.
-
@Accounts Playable With flaw questions, there's a "clear" flaw that one either gets or does not get (hopefully everyone here gets it and does not rely on the second tactic), otherwise risk having to let the AC's guide you. The reason I state this is…
-
@splitterhopeful Perhaps each PT focuses more heavily on a specific range of question types; I've found that to be quite common among the newer LSAT's where I'll blast through one PT's LR sections in record time because it contained question types …
-
@Lawschool2015 with respect to the current trend, yes. If you look at a LSAT score conversion chart, 87/101 is the lowest one can go for a 170, depending on the PT.
-
The problem with (C) is that, as JY mentions in his explanation, it is very narrow, so it is only applicable to those that are referred to. Age, weight, and health might not cause tissue damage among this defined group of (C), but that does not mean…
-
Also, if oversleeping can do as much harm as not getting enough sleep.
-
Btw, you're not looking for a sufficient assumption. There are no conditions to be connected; you're simply looking for a conditional statement or just a statement that says something on the lines of premise+conclusion from stimulus in order to vali…
-
Hey Accounts Playable, the stimulus states that: Premise: Allowing a species perish might undermine the viability of other species Conclusion: We should preserve the maximum number of species, which is another way of saying we shouldn't allow tha…
-
Hey Accounts Playable, the crux of the flaw is a sufficient necessary confusion hidden in a lot of mumbo jumbo. The premise tells us if SAA -> OLFCAS. Then it concludes that in a world of long time friends, that OLFCAS -> SAA, based on premise…
-
Hey confusedandenthused, yes, the $600m is coming from out-of-province expenditures, but it's not that they have another $600m in their pocket for other stuff; otherwise, why worry about strategies to accomplish saving $600m in the first place. Hop…
-
Hey 9kl49, none of the answer choices explicitly refers to illnesses so they all suffer the same issue as (D). It's our necessary duty to link each procedure as a contributing factor in diminishing illnesses. Hope this helps.
-
@josephellengar Are you looking at the correct question? (E) is not the answer; it is (D). As to @Accounts Playable and anyone else who might have issues with this question, This is one of those questions where the LSAT throws in a word people a…
-
Hey Accounts Playable, R states that if we need to stop and ask for directions (N) then we are lost (L): N -> L. Therefore, we do not need to stop and ask for directions (/N). So the argument R provides is: N -> L _______ /N R makes the i…
-
Hey Accounts Playable, the conclusion/necessary condition of the principle you're looking for is actually, "anyone who feels the TV show is worth preserving should buy the products advertised during the show," and only (B) says something similar to …