Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
7SageThanks
About
- Username
- 7SageThanks
- Joined
- Visits
- 660
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
I vote for Addenda
-
The fee waiver is valid for 2 years and then you need to reapply
-
I wish. I even called LSAC about this. If you get a fee waiver (the same fee waiver for the LSAT) then you get 4 CAS report fees waived. That's it. School's used to have the ability (3+ years ago) to waive the report fee, but they no longer do. So t…
-
Most of the comments from people with an experimental LR have been from people who had: LR(25)-LG-LR(25)-LR(26)-RC Where they are trying to figure out if their first or second LR was the experimental. I had: LR(25)-LG-LR(26)-LR(26)-RC Is there …
-
I think PT 71, Section 1, #12 is a pretty similar question
-
Answer choice A is just stating a correlation. Correlation alone does not necessarily support a causal conclusion.
-
@garicb-1 I struggle most with inferring an author's position, especially where the inference comes from structure and tone. Tone is slightly easier because there are opinionated word choices I can spot, but sometimes I find myself in a situation wh…
-
This is the lamest "feedback" report I've ever seen. I'm not sure a few sentence description of each section in general terms counts as feedback...
-
I think the inferring own thoughts passage was about this...Or am I still totally off base? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_fable
-
Can't stop thinking about those RC passages. Can anyone explain them without breaking the forum rules about specific questions and answers?
-
Not at all, this was helpful, thank you. I suppose the takeaway is that in general with all sufficient assumption question types you want to look for the gap between the support and the conclusion and pick an answer choice that closes that gap. If t…
-
Is using that type of prescriptive language ("should," "ought to," etc.) necessary to enable a conclusion with prescriptive language to be properly drawn in an argument that doesn't have premises that suggest a course of action? What I'm struggling…
-
No test location in all of California either
-
Me neither
-
When you say "record yourself" do you mean record yourself explaining each answer choice outloud during BR?
-
That's actually a really helpful explanation. Thanks!