Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
AngusMcGillis
About
- Username
- AngusMcGillis
- Joined
- Visits
- 313
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
Oh yeah I remember this game. Nice find, definitely similar
-
@sc1293 said: @AngusMcGillis said: @sc1293 said: Do you guys remember whether the LR section with question about a girl sending her application to be considered for an award, and mailing her application within 10 …
-
@sc1293 said: Do you guys remember whether the LR section with question about a girl sending her application to be considered for an award, and mailing her application within 10 days was an experimental or the actual?? It was real, I had 2 L…
-
@"7Sage Fan" said: Hi, I'm just wondering, how do people know if a section was real or not? Have the sections been released yet by LSAC? If someone had 2LGs, then they know that their 2LRs and 1RC were real. someone with 3LRs, 1LG and 1RC wo…
-
@"lady macbeth" said: @AngusMcGillis said: @"lady macbeth" said: I thought LR was hard for this test. LG & RC were both fair. Yeah I agree, I was just nervous for my first section. …
-
@"Pride Only Hurts" said: So I had LR-LG-LR-RC-LR I believe Bonbos eating leaves was the first section so that was real? Felt easy. Middle one took much longer to get through than I’m used to, so I’m guessing that’s the expirimental LR?…
-
@"lady macbeth" said: I thought LR was hard for this test. LG & RC were both fair. Yeah I agree, I was just nervous for my first section. @"lady macbeth" said: predictions on the curve? -9? LG was pretty easy gotta assume a lot …
-
This really sucks, I'm sorry Bamboo
-
I haf> @"lady macbeth" said: @T-SERIES yes it was the real LG. how did you feel about it? i also had two LG's. my test was LG RC LR break LR LG. i knew the mining was real because they hardly ever put experimental in sections 4-5 (this is jus…
-
I personally use /C -> (A->B) I can't remember which quesiton it is, but JY uses a circle method which I transcribed here
-
Yeah you've got it. NA,SA, and PSA questions all technically strengthen the argument. The stem could say strengthen, and the correct AC could be a SA AC. PSA and SA are basically the same thing. SA tends to be more logic heavy, and PSA will blur th…
-
This might be a better "down" themed song to listen to. I've been beat up, I've been thrown out But I'm not down, I'm not down Studying for the LSAT is a test of resilience. We've all been there. Keep it up and push on!
-
On the website, I'd assume no
-
Have you calculated how much in scholarships one point might be? two points? four? it is probably worth the effort and time to retake.
-
Good luck y'all!
-
@beezmoof said: This might help if this was your issue. It was attributing cause to the "BURROWING ACTIVITIES of the termites," not just "termites" in general. So to strengthen we would need specific evidence that reflects on the former Yep …
-
U of T and UBC are kind of the Harvard/Yale of Canada. McGill, U of Ottawa, and Osgoode are debatably as good. The Canadian law school system is nothing like the American one, every single school in Canada is "good". Rankings are borderline irreleva…
-
Hey diontret. Based on what you wrote I think you may have missed what the question stem was asking. The question asked about the enzyme theory of life, which is only mentioned in line 31. We know Paragraph 2 is set in the late nineteenth century a…
-
I don't think you're crazy @CHLOESAAD5 lol but @happyLSAT is right. Assumptions can be both necessary and sufficient. In this case AC A may not be necessary for this argument. The argument's conclusion is very weak ("it seems probable") so negating …
-
Hey A -> B negated is (some A are not B ), it shows that all A are B, isn't in fact true "“All Jedi use the Force.” Did you say “No Jedi use the Force?” That’s not right. To negate this statement, you’re denying the conditional relationship bet…
-
Nice catch! I'm going to go back and re-watch these videos. @LCMama2017 said: @akistotle said: Yea, that's because J.Y. recently updated RC videos for PrepTest 58-65 after these review sessions Do you think JY will do oth…
-
@"surfy surf" said: I briefly skimmed the question and “many” and “two” have absolutely nothing to do with the stimulus or answers. the problem with ac C is that the subject of the premise and the subject of the conclusion are different and th…
-
@eRetaker said: @"surfy surf" is correct. Yeah ofc, but in the stimulus many refers to an unknown amount and in AC C they refer to exactly 2, so you can't just conclude that those two statements are the same, just because many/some has an in…
-
Merriam Webster defines many as "consisting of or amounting to a large but indefinite number", so without further clarification I don't think two counts as many. Also C's conclusion seems a bit disjointed, in the premise The reviewers hoped, and in…
-
@lsat_kp20 said: I started the Ultimate package like 2 weeks ago, and it required me to spend about 10 hours a day (50-60 hours a week) to complete the entire package in time for the November test. If you are planning on taking the January tes…
-
Get the starter, You will be very busy just trying to finish that in time for Nov. Then you can extend access / upgrade at a reduced price later
-
Sounds like you could have gotten a better score than June, so keep it. Even if it ends up being lower, majority of schools take the highest score
-
Hey. In my head I tend to think, what makes the conclusion more relevant for str and less relevant for weakening. I would suggest going back to the curriculum and re doing relevant sections. Indicate premises, conclusions, context. Even if you kno…