Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
N3rve_333-1
About
- Username
- N3rve_333-1
- Joined
- Visits
- 504
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
Glad that it's recorded - will not be able to attend in-person due to work. Thank you, J.Y.
-
I feel ya
-
Had to think about what you said in your response for a while, but it makes sense. AC B most certainly does not offer "direct" evidence, and we actually need the sub-conclusion to give support to the main one. I got caught up in this question's word…
-
I can only see the first clause of the last sentence as evidence for the sub-conclusion if I make the aforementioned assumption; otherwise, the first clause sounds like a random fact that has no bearing on the strength of the sub-conclusion. After r…
-
Game 1 - 3.8 minutes Game 2 - 3.7 minutes Game 3 - 10.7 minutes Game 4 - 16.6 minutes I knew I was going to see ownage-tier games from LSAT writers later in the section after I finished the the first two quick lol. Made a stupid mistake in Game …
-
I think the session info for these is typically pinned in the announcement category of the discussion tab. J.Y. said that he was considering going over one of the sections in pt 67 next week.
-
That was awesome! Thank you.