I'll never forget the proctor with bad clock and "I'm always right" attitude. Oh, and the 60 or so pissed off future law students who knew they wer short-changed. I didn't notice anyone else, I was in the mode.
i dont recall that. My first section was the experimental LG section, and, according to the forums opinions, relatively easy. The second section had the much harder last game, and, i thought the third game was a little rough as well.
I know that the proctor in my center screwed up the timing... He/She called 5 minutes left at 25 minutes. All of us were so busy testing that we didnt say anything. When he/she called time, 60 people started complaining. He/she was adamant that h…
Second time around here... Started doing PTs, wasnt making any improvements. I stopped doing PTs, now am on my second time on the Ultimate Course, while drilling with Cambridge packets.
Im on my second round of the Ultimate package. I finished the first time, did some practice tests and didnt improve. I pushed the test back to June, am redoing the curriculum and drilling with Cambridge package...
Lesson 11 and 12 of Introduction to Logic.
i dont recall specifically if a point was made regarding ignoring contrapositives...and your question leads me to think you may be mixing up somethings.
the Contrapositive is the exact same thing as the …
I have to say, i really felt hopeless with LG as well. But, everytime i did a game, and had any doubt, i printed 10 or even 20... and just watch the video and did it again... and again and over and over...
I am at the point now where sequencing g…
Hi Mark
Your message is a little confusing. But i will try to help, at least for my own understanding.
Instead of using "=", we should use "->" for "implies"
Example:
All Jedis are force users becomes J->F
the Contrapositive to that is if …
Thank you both.. Jdawg113, anticipating that, i went and got a whole bunch of 1-38pt questions grouped by type (Cambridge) and am drilling on those..
thanks again!~
Thank you Jdawg113, my cold diagnostic was 149, then PT
150, 143, 144
-3/4 is for both sections BR on LR
so, it seems to me that i have understanding on most of it, but performance on PT isnt very good..
I am still weak on Logic Games, but i will miss 3 or 4 on LR and RC is 1 or 2 on BR. I usually run out of time on PT for RC...
At this point, i have finished 4 PTs.
ah, i thought i was the only one....
my cold diagnostic was 149, my first PT after 4 months of studying: 149
was ready to throw in the towel..but now have reinvigorated... my blind review shows i understand this stuff, its just about speed....