Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
abella123
About
- Username
- abella123
- Joined
- Visits
- 140
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
@akistotle said: @aciss038 said: What kind of scholarships can you get from UCLA with a 170+ LSAT and similar GPA? Do they give full-rides? There are a few samples, but here is a list of people who applied to UCLA with LSAT…
-
What kind of scholarships can you get from UCLA with a 170+ LSAT and similar GPA? Do they give full-rides?
-
For sure. I'm looking at UCLA too. One of the schools I'm interested in here as an exchange program at Southwestern in LA, I figured I'd do it and see if I can network well enough to land a gig after school. But I'm also thinking why not just direc…
-
I heard Osgoode is very hollistic. I have friends who have gotten in with OK GPA's but they had 165+ LSAT's, relevantly, I've had high GPA's and mid 150's LSAT. I think Osgoode is more forgiving depending on what you did in life. As of U of T thoug…
-
We're literally the same except I applied to McGill, Dal & UBC. I withdrawn my applications, applied to McGill w/o the LSAT just to see if I can get lucky, but I chose to sit for September. Take your time. I was literally freaking out a few days…
-
@keets993 said: I agree with postponing, it seems like a great idea! I feel you on the age thing, it feels like once you've graduated you should be out there and beginning your desired career especially when your peers are. But ultimately, you…
-
@RGBeetobe said: @aciss038 I went to McGill for undergrad and have several friends who went to LS there- they look really favourably upon multiple applications as long as there is improvement in your application the second time around. It show…
-
@keishabarnes95 said: Yeah, I agree with what some people are saying, if you want to postpone, postpone, but scoring in the 160s is still great and that will get you into a great school. If age is an issue for you I promise you that you are ne…
-
@"Alex Divine" said: You gotta chill out dude. Part of being a successful adult and working as an attorney is having a strong resistance to stress. It's not worth having mental breakdowns over a test... Take whatever time it takes to achi…
-
@JMENCEK said: I am in the same exact position as you and I think I'm going to postpone to June for the following reasons: 1) I am not scoring where I would like to be scoring on my practice tests and definitely feel I could improve (I am scor…
-
@chicaryss I'm in Canada. Haha. My dream school is McGill (Osgoode second). I'll take your advice. Seeing as McGill doesn't require the LSAT, I'll apply without it as a shoot your shot type of thing. But I'm definitely going to just study study stud…
-
@"Adam Hawks" said: I am 33 and I am old. Life has passed me by young buck. However, you're still young! So go watch the Defiant Ones a few more times while you postpone that upcoming LSAT. I will definitely be on the lookout for the Defi…
-
I know I'm not old, but I have a bad habit of having a "5-step plan" mentality where if anything goes in another direction, it freaks me out. I'm learning (the hard way) that shit doesn't happen as you want too. But thanks guys. I guess I'll see how…
-
That last part is GOLD. I’m going to try this. Thanks so much!
-
For me, I fell on law in a rather odd way. My goal was to become a musician. Though I did the whole university thing and got a bachelors in one of the social sciences — music (singing specifically) had always been my thing. My interests in law stemm…
-
I'm from Canada. McGill University is my dream school and WILL be the law school I attend this fall (speaking it into existence).
-
Can I get in on this? Was just about to start working on those kind of questions! @Sami
-
@"Alex Divine" said: @aciss038 said: Hi everybody. I scored a 143 cold (done in June 2017) but I don't really consider it valid because I was sleeping through Reading Comp and barely taking the tests seriously. Regardless, my …
-
@goingfor99th said: G V I or V bnb The first rule says they can't both be in; they may both still be out. The second rule says one must be in but that they can't both be in/out together. That was very straightforward, I get it now. …