I had an exp LR and had a question about zebra finches and some other bird and genes/chromosomes diverging? But can't remember what other questions that was included with. Can someone confirm if this was an exp sec? I thought this sec was slightlyy …
This has happened to me in cycles through out my studying. I've been studying for over 2 years now. I'd be scoring very high for about 7 tests in a row, and then my scores would start to dip 6/7 points, and then I would have spotty test scores with …
ok this is everything here bc I just scored C2 (which I heard was supposed to be relatively easy) andddddd I blew it. So I instinctively came to this forum, but got caught up in HONY bc of that latest post from JY and then I started reading about ve…
thanks, that was immensely helpful. It's frustrating that I failed to see that real life application because I was seeing this only in terms of lawgic: ~o --> ~p and I was so sure that the contrapositive was supposed to help bridge P & O ughh…
@"Tina Cho" - sorry, not sure if I'm getting your question, can you elaborate?
The application tells us that Delacruze is fully qualified and this is how we can start to line up the pieces with the help of E to get to the conclusion we should not h…
This question gives us a principle and a scenario where the principle has been applied, but the scenario is missing a piece so we have to fill in the missing part to justify the application.
Principle:
fully qualified candidates do NOT currently …
What were you guys wavering between in PT78 S1 Q6? I think the question that was the most WTF for me was S3 Q23.
lol but I'm nervous now bc I don't know if I'm seeing the overall trend - WHAT ELSE AM I MISSING?!
@"Accounts Playable" thanks so much - I definitely see why E is wrong - EUREKA.
Clearly, I misread C because, this is how I understood C:
Two groups of animals at this time - hunted (100), not hunted (100). "Very few" of those not hunted (3) were e…
I've been studying for a while but managed to learn a couple new things from Corey to incorporate into my studying - thanks and hope we'll have another one of these with you to get to the RC sesh!
ugh yes I am all too familiar with this pattern myself. It's THE WORST.
The only thing I've tried is to take a break and it works (although for me, it was no magic cure - if there is one, I'd really like to know for future reference). Even if I wa…
@Pacifico said:
Felt pretty good but my ego tells me that all the time... I think realistically I should get a 165-169 but my ego thinks I should get a 165-175... So we will see who is right soon enough!
this.
WORD. there should be xanax I can ge…
I'm in the same boat with you - it's to the point where I'm now nervous to take more tests as I get closer to test day because I don't want some bizarre score that makes me say, I knew it this was all dumb luck, and then get all funny on test day!!
so I shouldn't assume that "enabling people to believe in better futures" is optimism?
shouldn't this be one of those safe presumptions you can make on the lsat?
I skipped 3 questions on my last PT after reading this, and came back to them at the end of the test - something I couldn't manage to do before. Thanks for the help!
I have a really hard time skipping questions on LR bc unlike LG substitution questions where I know as soon as I read the question that I should skip this, with LR I won't know if this is a hard question until I've read the stem, stimulus, and the a…
7p est can you all start with the logic games then? I'm going to try leave work early to get on this call tonight but it'd be great to catch the RC discussion if possible!