Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
QQ ILLSAT
About
- Username
- QQ ILLSAT
- Joined
- Visits
- 27
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
Thank you so much. @nye8870
-
@DumbHollywoodActor Got it. Thank you so much.
-
@nye8870 Could you add more thoughts on why here D is NA rather than SA or is both NA and SA?
-
@nye8870 Hi, thank you so much for your response. However, I'm still a lit bit confused. If Lsat allows us to make some assumption in the reconcile question, why A is incorrect? Let's say, since the students lack chemical background so they failed …
-
@nye8870 Thank you so much. This is really helpful. I am wondering if my understanding is correct. So according to C, if it was a W&W PD last year, then it was cancelled. (PD->Cancelled) However, there may be no PD at all last year, in whi…
-
you can get it on amazon
-
@Pacifico said: Thank you so much! Though I get another 169 in PT 65, I get a 176 in the BR according to your instruction. I am more confident now. LOL~
-
Dear Pacifico, Thank you for your timely reply. They are extremely helpful and I do appreciate it. I have some follow-up questions. First, in light of BR, I usually review all the questions in LR and RC in the following way: review one question, …
-
Thank you so much. Your comments are really helpful.
-
Hi guys, Your reply is so helpful. A follow up question, shall we diagram question when there is no clear logic indicator? Also, when the premises says that B is causes by A, could we write as A-->B? Is conditional logic and causation the same…
-
Dear Brna, Thank you for your reply. It is really helpful. However, I am still wondering generally, could we write causation into conditional logic? Like A causes B, so A-->B? Thank you so much.