I cant speak for any other tablet, but in my opinion, the ipad works just fine with 7sage's digital testing. I saw slickdeals had some sales on it for like $250. The only thing is that highlighting on the ipad sucks... But then again, i have not tri…
Honestly, there is are none lmao. Basic propositional logic just only allows us to represent it as (Earnings --> DP to hours worked). But, if it helps just do it as a ratio? So, Earnings : hours worked. Its better to represent it as a ratio if th…
@BlindReviewer @LSATcantwin @drbrown2
It took me a while, but tell me what you think of the following explanation. It seems to make waaay more sense to me. In essence, the answer to is irrelevant to whether the precept is violated. That was just a …
@drbrown2 Yeah... I honestly have no clue what you're saying with this: "So they negated the necessary condition, which means that either I or FPU would be negated. They chose FPU." Lets start at the top.
(i) Unviolated Precept: Inviting and Functi…
@LSATcantwin
Wait im super confused now... I agree with what you said in the latter half. That's similar to what @BlindReviewer explained to me, I think. But im confused on your the definition of violating the precept. You said violating the prece…
@BlindReviewer I think you might be on to something; but so i understand it clearer, do you mind explaining it me with the following example?
Previously, in order to get a high LSAT score and get into Yale, students must study hard.
This rule is …
@LSATcantwin, No offense, but your explanation is inconsistent... You first claim " IF inviting AND functional THEN unobtrusive"Then you follow that up with the statement "You need both I and f in order to get to unobtrusive."This is diagrammed as
…