Hi Sami, thank you for doing this amazing work! Quick question, could we have a session focusing on Point at issue: disagree questions in the future? Or did you already host one but I missed it?
@parkeuny said:
I agree with the Economist. Another friend of mine recommended Oxford’s website of Very Short Introductions as a way of exposing yourself to other subject matters. This might help you navigate unfamiliar concepts
more easily…
@"Lucas Carter" said:
@"xiaonuan.li1 April" said:
Thank you! The articles in that website really resemble RC passages relating to humanity and fine arts. Do you and the other 7 sager belongs to a RC study group where you guys j…
@"Lucas Carter" said:
I recommend this site: https://aldaily.com/. It aggregates articles on philosophy, art, book reviews, and culture. The articles all contain arguments of some form and are considerably longer and generally as tough if not …
@MIT_2017 said:
@"xiaonuan.li1 April" said:
Thank you! How do you think about the Wall Street Journal and FiveThirtyEight then?
This question wasn't directed to me but since they were my suggestions I figured I might as wel…
@"Cant Get Right" said:
Yeah, there's nothing like the real thing.
I do think Economist does a good job of conforming to the average RC passage reading level. It's very consistent though, which the LSAT, of course, is not. I'd recommend g…
@MIT_2017 said:
I tend to agree with what @Alex has said. But if I had to make another suggestion, it would be The Economist, as it covers a wide array of topics, has many somewhat short articles, and assumes an educated audience. If that's in…
@Alex said:
I personally found that doing real reading comp passages was most helpful. There is nothing better than practicing with the real thing, and luckily there are so many tests that it's highly unlikely you'll run out anytime soon.
Th…