Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
hihihi9993
About
- Username
- hihihi9993
- Joined
- Visits
- 741
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
@NerfThis said: The answer, [B], isn't a [C→P] but rather a comparative statement, saying you learn more about a spot when you spent a lot of time there compared to when you only spent a little amount of time. Technically the stimulus can…
-
@NerfThis said: without assuming you did the translations correct, it's hard to see what you're asking for. Got any specific examples? For example, PT67 Section2 #3 Thank you for your help!
-
@lexxx745 Thank you! @Markmark Thank you for your concern
-
@avelamb111 said: I've found that 7sage's digital format was pretty close to the actual testing experience. There was a collapse function as well as the opportunity to eliminate answer choices on the actual LSAC administered test. You can use …
-
I know the answer to this question was very obvious, but for those of you who was struggling with me, I will write down what I have figured out. The bolded parts are the main difference. (1) Which one of the following could be a complete listing of…
-
@achen013 said: The lingual shift in that question is indeed very subtle. 'A' is incorrect because the argument does not actually draw any conclusion about the "general population," the words 'more' and 'most' are not interchangeable here. The…
-
@"Habeas Porpoise" said: @hihihi9993 said: @"Habeas Porpoise" said: @cooljon525 It seems more restricted than that: 3x in a year, 5x in five years, and 7x lifetime. Counting for five years and life t…
-
@"Habeas Porpoise" said: @cooljon525 It seems more restricted than that: 3x in a year, 5x in five years, and 7x lifetime. Counting for five years and life time is from the september test, correct?
-
Thank you @achen013 and @BinghamtonDave ! The reason why I asked this question was because of PT22 S2 Q25 AC (A). It is a flaw question, and I initially chose (A - draws a conclusion about the population in general based only on a sample of that p…
-
@drbrown2 Thank you so much! "It seems like they were trying to get the majority to be on their side."
-
@redshift You saved my life! Thank you so much! "If X gives rise to situation Y, and we want to decrease Y from happening, one way to do that is to decrease the presence of X." That inference from the causal reasoning was so difficult to dige…
-
Thank you for your comment! When I first saw the stimulus, I felt like I had to link 'weakened immune system' and 'reducing participant's stress level'. So, I prephrased NA answer to be something like 'stress level influences immune system' or 'red…
-
Thank you both! @NotMyName @"samantha.ashley92"
-
@"Rigid Designator" Thank you so much for your help!
-
@beezmoof Do you mind sharing your substitution question list (eg. PT-Section#-Question#)? I am also having a big trouble... Thank you in advance!
-
@"Rigid Designator" Thank you for your reply. Do you mind answering one more question for me? Can A->C, B->C be written as A/B->C ? Because 'or' here is inclusive!?
-
@akistotle said: @d931n027h said: @akistotle said: • Bi-conditional (A /B; "Or, but not both rule": https://7sage.com/lesson/or-but-not-both/) J.Y. treated PT24 S4 Game 1 (https://7sage.com/lsat_expl…
-
@akistotle said: • Bi-conditional (A /B; "Or, but not both rule": https://7sage.com/lesson/or-but-not-both/) J.Y. treated PT24 S4 Game 1 (https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-24-section-4-game-1/) as an In/Out game. The appetizer is …
-
@akistotle Thank you!
-
@zmeeker91 said: I would say it is the first, unless you are looking at an In/Out game where both F and G have to be selected. The second would imply that anytime that G isn't hired in a department, F must be. That is stronger than what the st…
-
@akistotle said: @d931n027h said: @10000019 said: @d931n027h said: @10000019 22! Is it too early to be discouraged...? Or should I be discouraged...? The comments underneath the explanation…
-
@10000019 said: @d931n027h said: @10000019 22! Is it too early to be discouraged...? Or should I be discouraged...? The comments underneath the explanations make me feel like I am not on the right track. I think it's too ea…
-
@10000019 22! Is it too early to be discouraged...? Or should I be discouraged...? The comments underneath the explanations make me feel like I am not on the right track.
-
@saberati said: I'd probably do J/O* to remind me that O in is N in *! Another great way! Thank you!!!
-
@akistotle said: @d931n027h said: @akistotle said: @d931n027h said: TWO QUESTIONS TO ASK! Thank you in advance! 1) Let's say I want to find all "OR pairs" within /N->/O-…
-
@akistotle said: @d931n027h said: TWO QUESTIONS TO ASK! Thank you in advance! 1) Let's say I want to find all "OR pairs" within /N->/O->J->/K->P. Is the following list a complete "OR pairs": /N->P …
-
Ooh nvm. Maybe it is because the last sentence is the author’s comment, not the research.
-
@FerdaFresh I am sorry, but they said no
-
You are awesome! @thisissparta !!!! Thank you so much! I get it now!