Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
EuripidesFan
About
- Username
- EuripidesFan
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
Do not follow voyagers guide. It comes down to understanding the essence of what u read in under 4 minutes so that you can answer general questions quickly and have time to look back for specific questions. Little to no markings are needed.
-
Plus if you buy from 7sage you get the PTs in convenient pdf form making it a sinch to print and reprint sections you are having particular difficulty with. I love being able to print a copy of a game whenever I feel like and have a fresh go at it.
-
Find the gap and fill it with the answer choice. Basic assumption questions will have a small hole in the argument in which the correct answer choice will fill perfectly. Sufficient assumption questions will fill it as well...and perhaps overfill it…
-
Here Here for 7sage!
-
The book reviews and obituaries from the Economist are also very LSAT-like
-
Ya there's an article in this week's issue about nanotubes (cylinders made of carbon). It sounds like it was taken straight from an LSAT science passage.
-
Oh I see. Well every LSAT question out there, no matter the year, will help you understand the test better. So I applaud your resourcefulness.
-
you need to internalize all the basic LR technique so that when you review the questions you missed, they were only genuinely difficult questions that evaded routine reasoning strategies. then you know that you have nearly peaked.
-
I don't have the question in front of me but I hope you have reserved a year for studying if you are starting all the way with Dec 1991 lol. The test has changed so much and there is so much material that I can't possibly see how you will be able to…
-
i.e. "in order to hit 170, you must dedicate yourself to the lsat" If you fail the necessary condition of dedicating yourself to the lsat, then you cannot hit 170. By the way congrats. I remember hitting my first 170+ score. I started the test at…
-
It's burnout.... Took me about a week to snap out of mine. Btw... try reading Michel Foucault's "Discipline and Punish" during your days off. It will simultaneously blow your mind and make most RC passages seem like a cake walk afterwards.
-
Yes and if someone could shed light on when to split the game into multiple subgameboards before attacking the questions that would be really helpful. Thanks.
-
I believe B is, or approximates, the error of a mistaken reversal. While it is true that "some" (line 3) mushrooms make use of this branching process to create beta-glucans that do slow, reverse or prevent cancerous growth (according to the stimul…
-
I second your thinking about taking the October test as good practice even if you end up canceling or not scoring as well as you hope. Law schools, especially nowadays, only care about the highest score you can report since that is the only score th…
-
I'm loving the video clips of J.Y doing the LR sections as creepy as that sounds. Gives me a better sense of how much he diagrams and thinks about particular questions in real time. Nice job.
-
You need to go in with a warrior mindset and know for certain that one of the answer choices is definitely correct, the other 4 are wrong, and you don't wanna goof up on a question that will make you wanna smack your own head when you go back to it …
-
Hey I just took practice test 59 myself. Section 2 was DEFINITELY harder. As further confirmation of this, you could see on Manhattan LSAT's LR forum that the vast majority of inquiries and posts pertained to section 2 and not 3. Also I'm quite sur…
-
Given the declining medians scores across law schools, postponing may actually be justified for many of you, especially if you think you will be able to raise that score above a 160. However (in reference to KS's post) don't spend too much time goin…
-
more limited than* those held by the candidates. Meaning, even in the best case scenario that the wealthy only influence the candidates in proportion to the amount of representation the party they back has in the overall population, that line of rea…
-
Think about it like this: Lets say the population is 50% Republican and 50% Democrat, then according to the argument, 50% of the wealthy are Republicans and the other 50% of the wealthy are Democrats ("their percentage in the overall population" ref…
-
I concede your point. Thanks.
-
Disclaimer!: I am not in law school yet but have have done quite a bit of research on this. Your final GPA is impacted by all classes you take in law school no matter the year, so of course you could improve your GPA in your 2nd and 3rd year. Howeve…
-
The course looks great. Everything Larry says makes sense and it's easy to see how if one follows his practical approach to conquering the 1l curriculum they will be at a major advantage relative to their peers. (i.e. memorizing the black letter la…
-
Thanks for your response.
-
I completely agree with you, I simply was uncomfortable with assigning any attitude without an explicit remark that indicated such an attitude. I guess this passage proves that attitude can be assigned to the author based on the logical arrangement …
-
I don't have the question in front of me but I think I remember it...the point I'd like to make is I believe I recall the conclusion of the argument making a bit of a leap in determining that the method can't even be applied to "prehistoric" creatur…
-
I have also found that book reviews, and even some movie reviews, are strikingly similar in the tone, style, and complexity found in many RC passages. Something about the abstract analysis applied to an art form that is found in such reviews is, I t…
-
I found myself struggling with this until I realized after a lot of time spent reviewing tests that much of what is contained in the stimulus is irrelevant. Or, maybe not entirely relevant, but only relevant in so far as it advances the logical stru…