Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
deleted account
About
- Username
- deleted account
- Joined
- Visits
- 137
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
LSAC won't be willing to change anything, and the JC has no control over it. You could include an addendum, but if you do it should be very very short, like 1 or 2 sentences (adcoms don't want to have to read even more).
-
IMO: LG have gotten harder mechanically, but far easier in terms of figuring out what is going on. For example, Hanna game (PT 2, Game ?) was one of the hardest games to map out, but ludicrously easy to solve. And PT 76 game 3 was easy to figure out…
-
@sarahfatima28: Much easier solution. Buy a $10 casio, reset to X:25 between every section. It can even do the break! Reset it to X:45
-
6
-
I don't think that would work, although I am open to other discussion. It might still be the best choice, but I don't think the argument neglects the possibility of disagreement. It only neglects the possibility of agreement. The last sentence (degr…
-
@joannewu: Love to share, and I may disappoint, haha, because I don't really know. In a class I instruct someone asked me this question the other day and I've been having trouble creating a coherent answer. More I have a list of tips: 1) I really…
-
@DaveH162 Mine wasn't affordable at all. The person whom I hired is not an Ivy League grad, but is a brandname, so was above-average in terms of cost. I have no one else to compare them to, but I think that what they charged is reasonable in the c…
-
^^^ Read Pacifico's answer. My consultant made my applications vastly superior this year to what they were last year. I was terrified that I'd get a great LSAT score and it would be my essays that sunk me. If I don't get into one of my reach schools…
-
I think depends on your ability per section and goals. Assuming you are taking in December: If you are getting more than -5 on LG, definitely focus that for a week at least, but still drill other stuff. LG is easy to improve in and can cause the mo…
-
Keep in mind that you can always update the adcom later with an addendum if you would like to write one about your LSAT. Personally I delayed sending in my apps until I had my LSAT score because I knew I would have to write an addendum (took test 3 …
-
@enzonabiev These are both sufficient assumption questions. In the first question, D does satisfy the assumption. But in 63.01.10, answer choice (D) does not satisfy the assumption. The argument is: she did something -> caused damage -> th…
-
@Pacifico said: No, several people did research on the topic and found evidence that that is the case. Glad you think it's hilarious though. #statusquoFTW Would you be willing to share this research? I have done some googling around and have not …
-
@mysojuli Whatever you eat, I would suggest making it the same thing that you do during your PT. For me, that meant a PB&J sandwich. I even was taking the test in my parents' area (my city is too loud to get reliable sleep) and they buy differ…
-
@"Accounts Playable" I think that you may find the most recent RC to be a bit easier. Might want to check, just to see if you are getting a true estimate with the tests you're on currently. For me is was fairly consistent prior to the 50's or so, …
-
@LSATKingsman: I actually think that's one of the best ways to do these. Is it flawed? Eliminate everything that isn't. Not flawed? Eliminate everything that is. You can even count sentences: ie in the stimulus the flaw was in the third sentence, s…
-
@What_To_Do: glad to help!
-
@markariangeorge: Glad to hear! No problem! Sorry I didn't get back sooner -- just finishing off my apps
-
@as5324 I have a theory for people who can't go quickly on LR. I think that people give too much respect to the answer choices. Just for perspective on my technique, on the October test I got 3 LR sections. I finished the three sections with 5, …
-
I never really did this myself, but it might be a good idea to use the BR tool on the analytics thing. You could bubble in only the answers that you did in time and then on the BR part answer the questions the way you would have if you had had time.…
-
57.2.2 is a question that covers long-distance runners, not the taxi driver question. The taxi question is 57.2.23 Here goes: A: Could be true, no reason to assume yes or no. C: We know nothing about whether they set their schedules. The argument …
-
I came into the LSAT with a very strong formal logic background. I have a BS in compsci, with a focus in theory (AI, discrete math, etc) so I have a somewhat unusual perspective on the test. But I think the logic is pretty simple on the LSAT. It's j…
-
@StopLawying: Here's the reading list that I used when trying to improve my RC. I read everything actively, searching for breaks in the argument. It was actually super helpful. I mostly was focused on refamiliarizing myself with super dense stuff, …
-
I wouldn't report it, but I'm also no law school admissions expert. Just seems to me like it would be a stupid blemish on your application. Here's how it's asked on my Columbia app, which I happen to be working on right now. I mean, you were arrest…
-
I disagree with @Pacifico here, which is unusual. IMO, you definitely should start PT'ing ASAP. I don't think that theory is worth anything if you don't have a background knowledge of the test that is pretty comprehensive. What I would do in your si…
-
Is it going to be on your disciplinary record for that school?
-
@Artwork94 That's the same problem I have. I miss rules sometimes (in fact, missed a rule on the Oct test). I had been working on this problem prior to my October test. I was training myself to do the following: 1) Always read the rules twice, …
-
@Artwork94: What types of games do you miss? Do you more often miss the games that have hard inferences (a la the mauve dinosaurs game) or do you more often miss games that are unusual/hard to understand (a la the 4th game in preptest 72 or the fou…
-
@E.CH.Poon Wow, that's embarassing. Thanks for correcting me. I went in thinking that OP had said that E was correct, and the found a way to force it to work for me. Apologies.
-
@"Accounts Playable" : I agree with your assessment of A, B, C. Those answers are crap. With respect to D, the answer lends a little bit of strength to the argument, given that it supports the thesis that people who are more confident are more lik…
-
@LSATConspiracy: I agree for the most part with @"GSU Hopeful", except that I know nothing about books (never used them). The only thing I would add is that if you are doing so awesomely on your BR, that indicates to me that you must be doing somet…