Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
blackhawksfan
About
- Username
- blackhawksfan
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
Thanks so much for the explanation, YesManJr! @ J.Y - I promise I did look for it!! (wasn't looking hard enough, clearly) In case anyone wants to practice with this rule in the Logical Reasoning section, PT63, S3, Q. 22 is excellent practice!
-
Gotcha! Thanks A LOT again for typing all that out. This is great, learning something new everyday. So generally = usually = cannot apply that property to the group 100% of the time. I have not seen this often on the PTs but if I see it, I will make…
-
Hi David Michael, thanks for your excellent response! I really appreciate the detailed message. I definitely see the first sentence of the stimulus as "A ----> B" [salespeople ---> steer customers toward products from which they make their hi…
-
Thank you so much!
-
That's awesome! I don't recall PT 44 LG on the top of my head, but going from -10 to -5 is good. Keep doing em! It's the only way to get better. Cheers
-
Hello, I just did PT 65 yesterday. I actually had an opposite experience. I found the first LR section of that test harder than the second section. I also found the second LR particularly easier than other PTs. Perhaps the difference is due to our …
-
You can try to make a games bundle for yourself. For example, you can pick out some basic linear/sequencing games, use a paper clip to hold them together. Then the grouping in/out ones. Then double layering sequencing. You get the idea, SIMILAR game…
-
Gotcha- thank you Jonathan!
-
Hi Jonathan, thanks for your input. (Warning: partial PT 60 question SPOILER alert below) I re-read the conclusions for both questions. In the PT 60 example, I can see that the conclusion is supported by the surveys... but it's a terrible support…
-
Hi there! Thanks for responding. Yes- you are right, answer choice (a) in the medical example does indeed weaken. I am not confused about that particular question but rather, why in that case, 'another study' is acceptable as a weakener, yet in the …