@"Aiesha G." I would review JY's lessons on logic. This is what is called demorgan's law. You can deduce she did not buy a juicer.
http://7sage.com/lesson/contrapositives-demorgans-law/
A great indicator for when to split are the number game pieces in the game. A lot of times, when there are only 4 or 5 game pieces, this is a good indicator that you can probably split. Also recognize rules that are restrictive. Often games have 1 r…
In my experience the lsat proctor on 7sage was a pretty realistic indicator of how the pacing would go during the real thing. One thing to keep in mind, after the break following the third section, be ready to have your brain clicking at 100% right …
@aieshagrant4 I think the most important thing is to get real LSAT questions. Thus, I would find a way to get pdfs of all LSAT tests ever released (JY's course is a great way to get 36-74). Then I would focus on using only PT 1-35 for practice. The …
@blackpearl with regards to LR, reviewing JY's early course on grammar will help immensley. Approx 2/3 of all LR questions will be arguments. Every sentence in these questions will fall into one of three categories: background info, support for the …
For what its worth, here is how I went about getting better at games:
First, I referred back to JY's initial lessons on each game category. Pretty much every game on the LSAT will involve sequencing, grouping, or some combination of the two. But wi…
@AlexanderL0 everyone uses the lowest hanging fruit strategy, even the 170+ test takers. The only difference is that for the 170+ test takers, the lowest hanging fruit constitutes a very large percentage of the questions. So you want to work towards…
@bstew2002 if the modifiers don't match, then the flaw doesn't match.
Also, I wouldn't immediately skip all parallel reasoning questions. A lot of the time these go faster than other questions because the argument structures are so simple. Some are…
respectfully disagree with @nicole.hopkins on one point. I've found that usually you only have to map out 1 or 2 (3 if you're unlucky). The rest you can usually eliminate using shortcuts. For example, If the stimulus is conditional, eliminate any an…
@chupacabra
It is a good sign that you are able to do MP questions well (you should almost never miss these) as locating the MP is absolutely critical to consistently answering LR argument questions correctly.
In weakening questions, you will a…
@emli1000
I think it can be beneficial in the beginning to focus on RC passages of similar subject matter (all humanities one day, all science another) the reasoning is similar to why you would practice SA questions in LR for example. Humanities p…
@AlexanderL0
If you are aiming to score 160 or higher then NOOO, stop taking PTs. So it really depends on what your goal is. However, assuming it's 160+ you should be in the 170s when you blind review. You need to go back to the fundamentals
@AlexanderL0 if you weren't timing yourself when you paused the videos, you shouldn't be alarmed that you are missing more now that there is a time constraint. Do not worry, that is normal for everyone. The time constraint is not joke and is one of …
@msizzle27 My advice is to never get too high AND to never get too low. I've scored as high as 178 and as low as 165. Theoretically, all tests are of the same difficulty. The curve of every test is predetermined based on experimental questions of pa…
Yeah going over it again its clear to me now. P (propoganda) and RSS are entirely synonmous and enterchangeable. Def made this question more complicated than it needed to be. Still, I've seen quite a few LSAT questions and can't think of too many SA…
but in what you have above you basically just have A-->B-->C, a logical argument. You're not providing a missing sufficient assumption you're just correctly inferring what's already there. The stem says we need to provide a sufficient assumpti…
I've realized that just about every advertisement out there preys on common LSAT flaws haha. For example TrueCar "you can know you are getting a good price on your car because that's the price everyone else in your area is getting" well how inclusiv…
@E.CH.Poon
So if you have it like you wrote above (P --> RSS --> ~E)
answer choice D (H ----(usually)----> RSS is only sufficient to show that H is usually not education. However it does not speak at all to whether or not it is propoganda…
@Jengibre, thank you! haha I feel like people weren't understanding why I was so confused. Was starting to feel a little stupid lol. Come on @"Jonathan Wang" where you at?
right, so according to that we have propoganda is nothing but repetitive slogans (P-->RSS) so the argument can be diagrammed as follows:
P-->RSS
H most RSS (supplied by answer choice D)
conclusion:…
@EmergingAttorney180 welcome to my life (and i'm sure many others) I think the Trainer and Manhattan offer some really good insights in to RC strategy. Also 7sage's memory method is very helpful. Here is a discussion from a former Manhattan Instruct…
yes it is "health education is usually propoganda" meaning (H most P) that's what I have diagrammed above
my confusion stems from how to diagram the sentence "the former is nothing but an attempt to influence behaviour through repetition of slogans…
Technically this is how it should go I think
RSS --> P (it just isn't clear to me how we get this from the language in the stim)
H most RSS (missing premise provided by answer choice D)
therfore: H m…