HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| a | 134.7K | 431.7K |
| most | 19.1K | 25.1K |
| b | 10K | 23K |
| reverse | 390 | 453 |
-
Why Can't We Infer "B most A" from "A Most B"? What Assumptions are Made in Doing So?Hello, all! After personal reasons forced me to step away from the LSAT for some time, I'm just now getting back into the swing of things. What wa…
... can't we infer "B most A" from the statement "A most B"? Perhaps what I ... 'm struggling most to grasp is ... -
Can a NA answer have a "most" existential quantifier?I always get confused between the NA answers that states A most B and a subtle conditional (the correct answer). During the BR, I am able to correct …
... the NA answers that states A most B and a subtle conditional (the correct ... to correct myself by stating A most B strengthens but isn't required ... made a rule to myself: if the answer deals with "most," ... skip it.
Would that be a safe ... -
A is a "significant factor" in most BIf A (driving over the speed limit) is a significant factor in most B (accidents), can I establish a causal relationship between the two? Can I dr…
If A (driving over the speed limit) is a significant factor in most B (accidents), can I establish a causal relationship between the two?
Can I draw A ---M --> B?
#help
Thank you in advance! -
A confusion relates to Lawgic and Sufficent Assumption QuestionsI am very confused with a specific relationship between universal quantifiers and existential quantifiers. This confusion becomes annoying in Assumpt…
... . "A-->C + A -->B"
2. "A-->C + A -most->B"
3. "A ... -->C + A ... is understandable, because "A-->B" implies "A-most->B" and "A some B". So, we ... -
A specific Lawgic Confusion and Assumption QuestionsI am very confused with a specific relationship between universal quantifiers and existential quantifiers. This confusion becomes annoying in Assumpt…
... . "A-->C + A -->B"
2. "A-->C + A -most->B"
3. "A ... -->C + A ... is understandable, because "A-->B" implies "A-most->B" and "A some B". So, we ... -
Most relationship helpIs this correct? A most B most C A most C
Is this correct?
A most B most C
A most C -
PT49.S2.Q11 - cholesterol, which is a known factor in coronary heart diseasehttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-49-section-2-question-11/ While the right answer choice is very clear to me, it would be great if someone co…
... the stimulus and answer choice (B)?
My Breakdown: ... assume since A correlates with both B and C , that B correlates ... say NO, because A most B, A most C, only implies B some C.
B), the strengthening seems to rely ... -
Does "A causes B" equal to A -->B?Hi, guys, I am confused with the relationship between "causation" and conditional logic. Could anyone give me some help? According to the lessons, it…
... lessons, it seems that "A causes B" = A-->B. However, in PT25-S4 ... at the school. This is a parallel flaw question. I am ... -
Overlooked possibilities from A->BIt all concerns the basic form of: A->B (if you have a rocket, you can kill a cockroach) Immediately, based on this form, I can think of potenti…
... must use a rocket"
[A->B, therefore B->A [mistaken ...
A->B ; not A-> not B [mistaken negation ... a rocket to kill a cockroach, for "A->B; not A->not B" = "A->B; B ... ->A ... -
A cause BWhen there is a premise saying A cause B, For example. A. Premise(1): A Cause B Premise(2). There is B Conclusion: There is A Is this a valid …
... a premise saying A cause B, For example.
A.
Premise(1): A Cause B ...
Premise(2). There is B ...
Conclusion: There is A ... /> Premise(1): A Cause B
Premise(2 ... -
How often is a "most" statement wrong in a Necessary Assumption Q?In trying to gain speed I've found myself quickly eliminating "most" statements in NA questions, but I'm wondering how accurate this can be. By negat…
... 've found myself quickly eliminating "most" statements in NA questions, but ... this can be. By negating a most statement, "some" always leaves open ... -
is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing? -
/A some /B in English?is it Some are not A and not B? A --> C B --> C /A some /B I was trying to translate this into english and was having some trouble. for e…
... are not A and not B?
A --> C
B --> ... ; C
/A some /B ... />
if you are not a force user, you are not ... not Jedi and Not Sith? ( /A some /B) is that correct? -
contrapositive of A or B but not both... Clarification plzI understood "A or B but not both" as one of the followings: 1. A(O) B(X) 2. A(X) B(O) 3. A(X) B(X) Then what is the contrapositive of it? …
... . A(O) B(X)
2. A(X) B(O)
3. A(X) B(X ... contrapositive of it?
A/B = CONTRAPOSITIVE => /A + /B ?????
But my last ... statement (3) indicates /A and /B could ... -
Passage A and BHi Everyone- Do you know where/how we can access resources to RCs with the two mini-passages (passages A and B)? They seem to be more common on t…
... the two mini-passages (passages A and B)? They seem to be ... 7 Sage? Also, Is there a specific instructional video JY has ... questions, does anyone know of a solid outside resources that can ... -
Conditionals: Only A is B and the likeSo far, I have treated Only A is B as B-->A. So far so good. Recently, I have come across this question: Does the statement "only A is B" deny oth…
... have treated Only A is B as B-->A. So far so ... that amount to A--> (anything not B ) a false statement (such ... A assures B = A-->B)
2. does this render (anything not A) --> B a ...
Assuming (only A is B = B-->A and no other necessaries ... -
A then B or C but not bothHow would one write "A then B or C but not both"? I usually use "A -> B/C not both" when solving games, but I was wondering if there is any other wa…
How would one write "A then B or C but not both"?< ... br /> I usually use "A -> B/C not both" when solving ... could also be written as A -> (B/C), but it looks ... -
How do I get PT A or BHey guys, this might be a dumb question but does anyone know if you can get PT A or B on 7sage? I have the Ultimate+ prep. For some reason, I rea…
Hey guys,
this might be a dumb question but does anyone know if you can get PT A or B on 7sage? I have the Ultimate+ prep. For some reason, I really can't seem to find the test on 7sage -
"no A are B" equals "all A are ~B"?Help! I thought "no A are B" equals "~B are A"
Help! I thought "no A are B" equals "~B are A" -
Without A or B means?Hi I was reviewing PT65.4.5. There is a sentence that says "The plaintiff has applied to the court for an order permitting her to question each defen…
... question each defendant without A OR B. I'm wondering whether ... it as without (A or B ), or (without A or without B ). The former ... should mean [no A ...
And what about without A AND B?
I came ... -
Most & Some**I understand this:** A ---most---> B -----> C | Valid Inference A---most--->C **I don't understand this:** A -----> B ---most---> C | no valid…
... this:**
A ---most---> B -----> C | Valid Inference A---most--->C
A -----> B ---most---> C | no valid ... inference
Why isn't A ... -
Diagram Help: If C does not occur, then A and B cannot both occurIf C does not occur, then A and B cannot both occur Would the diagram look like /C > A or B or... /C > /A & /B or are those both wro…
If C does not occur, then A and B cannot both occur
Would the diagram look like
/C > A or B
or...
/C > /A & /B
or are those both wrong @.@ I'm so confused -
Some and MostYou can do: P: A some B C: A most B But you cannot do: P: A most B C: A some B Is this right? Some includes most, which is why in the …
...
P: A some B
C: A most B
But you cannot do:
P: A most B ...
C: A ... some B
If A then B and C rewritten as if A and B then C??I swear I remember learning in one of the lessons that the lawgic if A then B and C can be rewritten as if A and B then C and vise versa but I can't …
I swear I remember learning in one of the lessons that the lawgic if A then B and C can be rewritten as if A and B then C and vise versa but I can't find that lesson anywhere and am not sure if I just made that rule up in my head. Is this lawgic logical?Negation of "A and B"I really don’t understand where this rule ” For conditionals, A and B negates to A → /B ” came from or how it would be applicable to the actual exam.…
... rule ” For conditionals, A and B negates to A → /B ” came from or how ... ’re positing that /B is a necessary condition of A and thus can ... as being A and B → C negated to /C → /A or /B as specified ... be either A and B -> C or C -> A and B included ...Are these arguments valid?**Most beers in are cans. Most cans contain beer.** Conclusion: The number of beers is not greater than double nor fewer than half the number of can…
... on their own.
B most C
B most A
Therefore:< ... You would need to have a Most or Some statement chained to ... of not being able to reverse Most statements like you can with ... as AB, whereas most is A--most-->B if that makes it ...Qualifiers and Valid/Invalid ArgumentsHey everyone! I've been reviewing valid and invalid argument forms this afternoon, and I'm having a bit of trouble so any help would be greatly appre…
... infer from "most" + "most" (Valid Argument Form 9)
A most B
A most C
_________
B some C
A most B most C
_______________
A some C
Help: how to treat the LSAT's use of "Probably"?When doing this question, I could not agree with JY's explanation no matter how many times I've heard it. I simply think his reasoning on why he elim…
... he eliminated answer choice A is incorrect. In ... of it as "in most cases", meaning, in more ... like how when given A-most->B-most->C, we ... can't make any inferences between A ... the correct reasoning for eliminating A.
https ...Conditional Logic, valid & invalid argumentsEven though conditional logic seemed easy when I went through the CC, it continues to trip me up on harder questions, so I'm reviewing some basics: …
... A->B and A most C, then B some C.
If A most B and A most C ... , then B ... to SOME statements)
A most B most C, therefore A most C (transitive property does ...LOGIC QUESTIONI have a logic question I was wondering if you could help me with. So I was doing a MBF question on Test 41 section 1. Essentially, the stimulus g…
... get a contrapositive out of A (Most)-> B nor out of A B. ... A->B:
By inference we can say A (most)-> B ... By inference we can say ~B (most)-> ~A
By ... we cannot get a contrapositives from “most” conditionals and “some ...
