HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| a | 137K | 438K |
| most | 19.4K | 25.5K |
| b | 10.1K | 23.1K |
| some | 32.7K | 45.7K |
| c | 6.8K | 11.6K |
-
A ---> B --SOME--> C; therefore A ----> C, is that a valid argument?A ---> B --SOME--> C; therefore A ----> C, is that a valid argument? I know A ---Some--> C is an invalid argument, but I am unsure about the not so…
A ---> B --SOME--> C; therefore A ----> C, is that a valid argument?
I know A ---Some--> C is an invalid argument, but I am unsure about the not some situation. -
Why Can't We Infer "B most A" from "A Most B"? What Assumptions are Made in Doing So?Hello, all! After personal reasons forced me to step away from the LSAT for some time, I'm just now getting back into the swing of things. What wa…
... away from the LSAT for some time, I'm just now ... can't we infer "B most A" from the statement "A most B"? Perhaps what I ... 'm struggling most to grasp is ... -
A then B or C but not bothHow would one write "A then B or C but not both"? I usually use "A -> B/C not both" when solving games, but I was wondering if there is any other wa…
... "A then B or C but not both"?
I usually use "A -> B/C ... could also be written as A -> (B/C), but it looks very ... -
If A then B and C rewritten as if A and B then C??I swear I remember learning in one of the lessons that the lawgic if A then B and C can be rewritten as if A and B then C and vise versa but I can't …
I swear I remember learning in one of the lessons that the lawgic if A then B and C can be rewritten as if A and B then C and vise versa but I can't find that lesson anywhere and am not sure if I just made that rule up in my head. Is this lawgic logical? -
LR Study Guides ThreadI was wondering if we could upload our study guides in this post for those taking the June and upcoming LSATs can always come back to this.
... , some A’s are C’s
[Lawgic] A -most-> B -most-> C
_________
A some C ... /> A -most-> B some C
_________
A some C
A some B -emli1000 March 2015 Study Guides/Cheat Sheets
-
A question about "some" and "most" relationshipMost A are C; Most B are C, can we make the link that "some A are B"?
Most A are C; Most B are C, can we make the link that "some A are B"? -
Most & Some**I understand this:** A ---most---> B -----> C | Valid Inference A---most--->C **I don't understand this:** A -----> B ---most---> C | no valid…
**I understand this:**
A ---most---> B -----> C | Valid Inference A---most--->C
**I don't understand this:**
A -----> B ---most ... -
Can a NA answer have a "most" existential quantifier?I always get confused between the NA answers that states A most B and a subtle conditional (the correct answer). During the BR, I am able to correct …
... the NA answers that states A most B and a subtle conditional (the correct ... to correct myself by stating A most B strengthens but isn't required ... as some, can still be a valid NA answer, because negated some statement ... -
Diagram Help: If C does not occur, then A and B cannot both occurIf C does not occur, then A and B cannot both occur Would the diagram look like /C > A or B or... /C > /A & /B or are those both wro…
If C does not occur, then A and B cannot both occur
Would the diagram look like
/C > A or B
or...
/C > /A & /B
or are those both wrong @.@ I'm so confused -
How often is a "most" statement wrong in a Necessary Assumption Q?In trying to gain speed I've found myself quickly eliminating "most" statements in NA questions, but I'm wondering how accurate this can be. By negat…
... 've found myself quickly eliminating "most" statements in NA questions, but ... this can be. By negating a most statement, "some" always leaves open the ... -
Some and MostYou can do: P: A some B C: A most B But you cannot do: P: A most B C: A some B Is this right? Some includes most, which is why in the …
... A some B
C: A most B
But you cannot do:
P: A most B
C: A some B ...
Is this right? Some includes most, which is ... is correct, but most does not include some, hence why the ... -
A confusion relates to Lawgic and Sufficent Assumption QuestionsI am very confused with a specific relationship between universal quantifiers and existential quantifiers. This confusion becomes annoying in Assumpt…
... "A-->C + A -->B"
2. "A-->C + A -most->B"
3. "A-->C + A some B"< ... understandable, because "A-->B" implies "A-most->B" and "A some B". So, we ... should have the sa… -
A specific Lawgic Confusion and Assumption QuestionsI am very confused with a specific relationship between universal quantifiers and existential quantifiers. This confusion becomes annoying in Assumpt…
... "A-->C + A -->B"
2. "A-->C + A -most->B"
3. "A-->C + A some B"< ... understandable, because "A-->B" implies "A-most->B" and "A some B". So, we ... should have the sa… -
PT49.S2.Q11 - cholesterol, which is a known factor in coronary heart diseasehttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-49-section-2-question-11/ While the right answer choice is very clear to me, it would be great if someone co…
... B correlates with C?
*My intuition would say NO, because A most B, A most C ... , only implies B some C.
Similarly,
Superprep A, B and C game difficultyDid anyone else find these games sections more difficult than usual? I am a pretty consistent -0 to -2 on the games sections, but damn the A, B, and…
... difficult than usual? I am a pretty consistent -0 to -2 ... sections, but damn the A, B, and C games sections are brutal. For ... 3 and 4 on PT A each ate up like 12 ... be redoing these sections in a few weeks. Did anyone else ...Overlooked possibilities from A->BIt all concerns the basic form of: A->B (if you have a rocket, you can kill a cockroach) Immediately, based on this form, I can think of potenti…
... even though A->B, it could be that C->B as well ... kill a cockroach, for "A->B; not A->not B" = "A->B; B->A".
What are some implications that I have missed?Hardest & Most Difficult LSAT Sections ever listedHey guys, I know we only finished with the test a week ago, and even some are finishing up in Florida today (Congrats btw!). And I haven't even reall…
... /passages, but to have the most difficult sections. This way when ... with obviously five being the most difficult and one being the ... Games, though we have seen some weirder and more difficult games ... that some of the earlier PT's especially PT A, B, and C which ...A > Either B or C. and then No C... What Must Be True?Problem: PT 2 - S2 - #13 To simplify, If A then, either B or C. And we were given No C. What Must Be True? 1. No A 2. or Can we still say A >…
... simplify,
If A then, either B or C. And we were given ... No C. What Must Be ... Can we still say A > B despite no C?
I ... am a bit confused... Any helps ...A is a "significant factor" in most BIf A (driving over the speed limit) is a significant factor in most B (accidents), can I establish a causal relationship between the two? Can I dr…
If A (driving over the speed limit) is a significant factor in most B (accidents), can I establish a causal relationship between the two?
Can I draw A ---M --> B?
#help
Thank you in advance!Most relationship helpIs this correct? A most B most C A most C
Is this correct?
A most B most C
A most CQualifiers and Valid/Invalid ArgumentsHey everyone! I've been reviewing valid and invalid argument forms this afternoon, and I'm having a bit of trouble so any help would be greatly appre…
... "most" + "most" (Valid Argument Form 9)
A most B
A most C
_________
B some C
However this is not a ...Some Game cheat sheets repostedHey guys, I dug these up in the older posts. Just wanted to repost if anyone needs them Edit: These notes belong to @emli1000! Thanks! INTRODU…
... /> o A→/C contra C→A
o /C →A contra /A→C
o COMBINED: A←→ /C contra /A ←→C
A→ (B→C)
/A or (B→C)
/A or (/B or /C)
(/A or /BDoes "A causes B" equal to A -->B?Hi, guys, I am confused with the relationship between "causation" and conditional logic. Could anyone give me some help? According to the lessons, it…
... some help? According to the lessons, it seems that "A causes B" = A-->B ... at the school. This is a parallel flaw question. I am ...RC Lessons Learned, please do shareDear all, LSAT has become my new drug now. And what JY had said, RC has become especially addictive. As such, I am more desperate to score high o…
... answer correctly will be a direct reflection of your ... ) Interest. I find that most of the times, you don ... Often times, there is some logical relationship, like the ... is crazy about A cause B cause C cause D that ... it back. This a fraction of a second thing helps ...Flaw confusion, please help!!!Hi guys, I have some confusion going on here between the difference of the following question: https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-25-se…
... />
If A cause B cause C, then it concludes C causes A; this is ... wrong because the possibility of C some A, or C and A ... : (negating "most" to "some not", then it follows that some B is not A is ...Conditionals: Only A is B and the likeSo far, I have treated Only A is B as B-->A. So far so good. Recently, I have come across this question: Does the statement "only A is B" deny oth…
... to A--> (anything not B ) a false statement (such as A-->C)?
A) --> B a false statement?
For example, Let us assume C-->A ... ; given the statement above, would saying C-->B a false ...How do I get PT A or BHey guys, this might be a dumb question but does anyone know if you can get PT A or B on 7sage? I have the Ultimate+ prep. For some reason, I rea…
Hey guys,
this might be a dumb question but does anyone know if you can get PT A or B on 7sage? I have the Ultimate+ prep. For some reason, I really can't seem to find the test on 7sageConditional Logic, valid & invalid argumentsEven though conditional logic seemed easy when I went through the CC, it continues to trip me up on harder questions, so I'm reviewing some basics: …
... ;B and A some C, then B some C.
If A->B and A most C, then B some C.
If A most B and A most C ... , then B some CValid Argument FormsI am currently struggling to move past the CC lessons on valid argument forms. With the use of flashcards, I have been able to memorize what the abst…
... given the premise A-->B and the conclusion B some C, I automatically know ... />
All octopuses are kind. Most people named James are octopuses ... . Most people named James are kind ... I am looking to get some insight in terms of ...PT12.S1.Q25 - How do you diagram answer choices B and C?How do you diagram answer choices B and C? And can someone explain how and why C is a valid conclusion? A---> X---->E S--s--A A.) S--s--X B …
... choices B and C? And can someone explain how and why C is a ... valid conclusion?
A---> X ... /> S--s--A
A.) S--s--X
B
C)
D) /X--->/A