HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| a | 136.3K | 436.1K |
| some | 32.6K | 45.6K |
| b | 10.1K | 23.1K |
| most | 19.3K | 25.4K |
| c | 6.8K | 11.6K |
-
Without A or B means?Hi I was reviewing PT65.4.5. There is a sentence that says "The plaintiff has applied to the court for an order permitting her to question each defen…
... question each defendant without A OR B. I'm wondering whether ... it as without (A or B ), or (without A or without B ). The former ... should mean [no A ...
And what about without A AND B?
I came ... -
Posting on behalf of a 7Sage User: How to translate an unusual type of embedded conditional?**[I am posting on behalf of a 7Sage user. Please feel free to leave your comments below. Thank you for your help!]** I've been studying with 7Sag…
... posting on behalf of a 7Sage user. Please feel free ... conditional; however, I found a weird conditional while studying the ... A, then /B unless C" you just translate it to, "A and B, then C"< ... along the lines of: "/A unless B, then C." Just confused on how ... -
PT.60.S3.Q3 - building permit cannot be obtained by Feb 1I'm literally SO confused about this question. How are you supposed to diagram this? From my understanding, "Unless A --> NOT B" is equivalent to…
... understanding, "Unless A --> NOT B" is equivalent to..."-A --> -B"....right?
A OR B --> NOT C" would be diagrammed like "-A OR -B --> -C ... obtained by Feb 1 OR some of the other activities are ... -
LOGIC QUESTIONI have a logic question I was wondering if you could help me with. So I was doing a MBF question on Test 41 section 1. Essentially, the stimulus g…
... /> By inference we can say ~B (most)-> ~A
By inference ... we cannot get a contrapositives from “most” conditionals and “some” conditionals, from this ... you can imply MOST, from MOST you can imply SOME or from ALL ... -
Help needed! Any tips on maximum/minimum number-type in/out game questions?Hey LSAT Geeks~My test in 10 days and one of my lingering concerns is about the type of in/out game questions that asks "what's the maximum/minimum n…
... say you have 6 variables: A B C D E F
/A -> B -> C ->/E
B and C in as well, which ... you have E and A in, B and C out, and you don ... you can have most (4) in when either C, F or E ... -
[Contest] What's your favorite LSAT related moment?I'm curious. Your answer could be long / short / funny / serious. A few entries will be selected for free stuff here on 7Sage. Edit: Contest is o…
... to the page to see a logical reasoning section. The first ... . The answer choices were A) Yes, B) No, C) Maybe, and D) Refrigerator ... by far the funniest and most memorable LSAT related moment to ... -
Negation Help !Some A's are not B's A's -----> not B 's (some) What if I want to negate some A's are not B's? would the negation be .... …
Some cannot have a contrapositive such as you CANNOT have /A SOME /B because ... remember that SOME is an intersection. ... />
If you negate SOME then you'll end up ... my notes in the Some and Most relationships and watch ... -
Valid Argument #6 is messing me upHere's what JY says: All turtles know kung fu. All turtles are named after Italian artists. Therefore, some things that know kung fu are named aft…
... .
A ---> C
B ----> C
---------------------
/A some /B
To ... .
{some B's} {all A's, some B's, some C's} {some C's}
PT61.S2.Q23 - every brick house on river street has a front yardhttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-61-section-2-question-23/ So in JY's explanation the stimulus represents invalid argument form 4. But I'm ha…
... gt; F
Premise: HRF ---most--> 2
... therefore: BRH -most-> 2
JY ... yards is consistent with most HRF having front yards.< ... argument form number 4 (A-->B--most--> C therefore A ---most--> C)PT61.S2.Q23 - every brick house on river street has a front yardhttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-61-section-2-question-23/ So in JY's explanation the stimulus represents invalid argument form 4. But I'm ha…
... yards is consistent with most HRF having front yards.< ... most-> TS
Form in generic terms:
A —> B ...
B -most-> C
A -most-> C
a negation of "run for office" (meaning, NRO = C in ...Read all answer choices?If you think you've found the right answer choice, do you feel it is still wise to read through the other answer choices carefully? And how much time…
... .
Test taker: "A... nah.. B... eh... C... yup. Move on." Oh ... correct answer needed the word "most." As it turns out, E ... was almost identical to C except for this difference. They ... 't trust their judgment on A without checking the rest, and ...Do "Parallel" credited responses not consider "some," "many," "most," et cetera?I've been missing many "Parallel" (both flaw and not) because of, say, a credited response containing "most" while the passage does not. Am I to gene…
Many can equal most, but not necessarily. The ... in one answer choices. The "most" in this stimulus does not ... of reasoning (i.e. A most B most C, ergo A most C), then the difference would be ... in arguments could be the most fundamental skill for LSAT Logical ...valid argument formsIf one has learned all of the valid argument forms, does it make sense to learn the invalid forms? Of course, I could be incorrect, but it seems to b…
Right @nye8870, it's especially helpful for tricky parallel flaw questions! It's best to know that A-->B, B most C, therefore A most C is an invalid argument form rather than thinking "hmm this doesn't match up with my recollection of valid arguments."Embedded conditional translationI was wondering how you would translate an embedded conditional if the conditional in the necessary condition is negated. For example, A--->[Not (B--…
... ?
A---->B
B some /C
Negation of some is none, ... and negation of all is some ... So for example some A are not B would be A some /B.
... question. There are probably some mentors or sages that ...PT59.S3.Q19 - if understanding a word always involvesHi, I've looked at lot of explanations (I have starter so I don't have access to 7Sage explanation) and I'm still not able to understand this one. I…
... use the (A and /B) notation rather than the (A some /B) because in ... then there are some who understand a word and that ... been given. (C) Okay. Now, we have some conditional statements, which ... combine the sufficient condition (some babies understand all the ...PT62.S2.Q6 - although some nutritional factsI did not understand how and why he figured out which parts of the sentences he could use to make conditional statements from the video. He did not u…
... connected. Ac(A) if caffeine content listed then some people will improve ... their health. It’s really just A to B ... to C to D…from this ... is to say A triggers B which triggers C which triggers D. So ..."Most" confusionIf A most are B and B most are C is it correct to say A most are C ?
JY says..." A--most-> B-most->C ....... No valid conclusions!"Relative OrderingI would like to ask this question. For relative ordering. Q - R- P - L l G - F Given the above, who is, could, should …
... :
A--B--C--D you mean A before B before C before D (so A can ... your number line (1 is most expensive and 4 is least ... " follows the same direction. In most cases it's intuitive, but ... /> A--B--C--D means D taller than C taller than B taller than A OR A ...Give an example?Hey Everyone, Could anyone give me an example (whether on some test or just an example you could make up) of this valid form: A --> C B --> …
... me an example (whether on some test or just an example ... /> > A --> C
> B --> C
> --------------
> ~A some ~B
Give an example?Hey Everyone, Could anyone give me an example (whether on some test or just an example you could make up) of this valid form: A --> C B --> …
... an example (whether on some test or just an ... > > A --> C
> > B --> C
> ... > --------------
> > ~A some ~B ...
It sounds like ~A and ~B --> /C
or ...Give an example?Hey Everyone, Could anyone give me an example (whether on some test or just an example you could make up) of this valid form: A --> C B --> …
... an example (whether on some test or just an ... gt; > A --> C
> > > B --> C
> ... ; > > --------------
> > > ~A some ~B< ... /> > It sounds like ~A and ~B --> /C
>
.....
... get
/C-->/A
/C-->/B
Now this ... />
and we can conclude /A -some- /B
Do you recognize ...Can I treat "few" as same as "some" and "many"?Remember in "Some and Most Relationship" lesson, JY mentions that "some" and "many" can be used interchangeably because they both have subjective def…
... universal indicators, "some" statements, and "most" statements, "few" gives us a scope for ... /> Few-->A some B
and
Few-->A -most-> /B
a "some" and a "most" statement, we have some options.
..
... /> B ---> C
________________
/A some /B
/C ---> /A
/C ---> /B ...
________________
/A some /B
..
... ; C
> B ---> C
> ___________
>
> /A some /B ... ; A ---> C
> B ---> C
> ________________
> /A some /B
>
The above is a valid .....
... ; C
> > ___________
> >
> > /A some /B ... ; > B ---> C
> > ________________
> > /A some /B
> A → B
> A → C
> ________________
> C → B
> .....
... 1: A ---> C
Premise 2: B ---> C
Conclusion: ~A some ~B
Conclusion: ~Dogs some ~Cats
Premise ... that is neither **a dog** nor **a cat**.
... All invalid arguments commit a fallacy. So when anyone .....
... A ---> C
> Premise 2: B ---> C
> Conclusion: ~A some ~B ... A ---> C
> Premise 2: B ---> C
> Conclusion: ~A some ~B ... you swap it for a SOME because you see the ... from an all to a some in reasoning. All fallacies ...When doing Parallel flaw...Do you focus on finding the flaw in the argument and then matching that to an AC? Like any other flaw q, just instead of naming it you find another e…
... "If A then B, We have a B therefore A" or ... it could be as difficult as "ABC therefore A some C ... " with the A some C conclusion written first and the some relationship obscured in some ... conclusion and add a "maybe" or a "probably" ...Question on LSAT question" Most people who shop for groceries no more than 3 times a month buy prepared frozen dinners regularly. In Hallstown, most people shop for groceries…
... a much, much larger set than the first, and therefore the "most ... might not be in the "most" section of the second ... core issue here is that most of my family members ... see that:
A----most----->B----most---->C
A-----most---->C
does ...
