HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| a | 136.3K | 436.1K |
| some | 32.6K | 45.6K |
| b | 10.1K | 23.1K |
| most | 19.3K | 25.4K |
| c | 6.8K | 11.6K |
-
PT36.S1.Q22 - Any writer whose purpose is personal expression<font color="red">Admin note: Deleted. Please don't post the actual question</font> Translated: Poet --> Purpose PE <s> Ambig. Words Thus. …
... if I see "A" sometimes "B", it means If "A" then "B" in Sufficient ... equate "All A's sometimes do B" to "A some B". I think a good way ... this sentence is "some birds". Because "some" has a range of 1 to ... second sentence, "some" is being used as a predicate to the ... -
PT87.S3.Q20 - Although allowing coal miningI have an issue with AC A because I don't see how the argument's sub-conclusion draws from the stated claim. It seems to me that there is a need for …
... of how similar Answer Choice A and B are
Imagine ... of the argument A + B therefore C or A therefore B therefore C, B would be the ... that the structure is A therefore B therefore C.
Now getting ... -
In out/grouping board set up with complex not both condition?Not sure how to word this but; how do you all set up your in-out board to represent a not both rule when the rule has an and/or statement in it. …
... means if B and C are in then A is out ... and vis a vis.
If B and C are out A ... When the rule is: A then -B or -C then that would mean ... if either B or C is in A ... is out. Notation would be A/B/(mini slash)C ... -
Quick conditional question on contraspositivesHello Everyone, I wanted to know that if A -> B + C (with the + being "and") Then the Contra would be /B or /C -> /A And in another situ…
... A and B —> C
Negation: /C —> /A or /B
Original: A —> B ... or C
Negation: /B and /C ... —> /A ... -
Mistaken Reversal versus Mistaken NegationAren't the two logical equivalents? Mistaken Reversal is "confusing Necessary for Sufficient" while it's the other way around for Mistaken Negation. …
... add that technically a mistaken negation (given A→B) is anything that isnt A←some→/B. -
Not (A-->B) QuestionHi all, quick question! In the Harder MBT Questions unit, JY covers two questions that involve the negation of embedded conditionals. I'm a little …
A → /B necessarily includes A ←some→ /B, and therefore any individual instance of an A that is ... /B ... there is an instance of A that is not B, or A ←some→ /B -
Not (A-->B) QuestionHi all, quick question! In the Harder MBT Questions unit, JY covers two questions that involve the negation of embedded conditionals. I'm a little …
> @canihazJD said:
> A → /B necessarily includes A ←some→ /B, and therefore any individual ... instance of an A that is /B ... an instance of A that is not B, or A ←some→ /B
Thank ... -
Are these lawgic translations correct?#1 A cannot B without C. Translation: AB --> C /C --> /AB #2 A without B cannot C. Translation: /AB --> /C C --> AB I'm curiou…
... what u mean by: a cannot b without c
Molly can't ... Jump "A" and shoes "B"
if A then B
if /B then /a -
Are these lawgic translations correct?#1 A cannot B without C. Translation: AB --> C /C --> /AB #2 A without B cannot C. Translation: /AB --> /C C --> AB I'm curiou…
... /> A = an air traveler in Beijing
B = fly to Lhasu
C ... = first flying to chengdu
"A ... **cannot** B **without** C"
Rule: AB --> ... -
2 basic questions over logical reasoning.#help Hi everyone! I have 2 questions. 1st. In logical reasoning, when the question stem asks for the **main point**, is that slightly differe…
... with the conclusion; a conclusion is just a claim you are trying ... to deny the truth of a universal claim. In other words ... all **apples** are **bananas** (**A --> B**), that would equate to the ... apple which is not a banana, or **A some /B** . So to answer ... -
2 basic questions over logical reasoning.#help Hi everyone! I have 2 questions. 1st. In logical reasoning, when the question stem asks for the **main point**, is that slightly differe…
... > 1. There is a slight difference, but I would ... the conclusion; a conclusion is just a claim you are ... apples** are **bananas** (**A --> B**), that would equate to ... apple which is not a banana, or **A some /B** . So to ... one is not or some are not.
... -
PT71.S3.Q24 (Cameras and Concrete) - Does the Video have the Contrapositive Mixed Up?The 7sage video says that the stim. says: <del>S</del> -> (U or C) thus, <del>S</del> -> (<del>C</del> -> U) But this doesn't seem right? …
Thats not a contrapositive. He's saying in the world of S, you must have U or C. Therefore in the world of S, if you don't have C then you have to have U.
If A, then B or C.
A
B
_______
Therefore C -
PT58.S1.Q11 & PT62.S4.Q19: Come on, where's the 7sage community! My post is getting ignored!I just couldn't anticipate the flaws with either of these questions and would like to know how people who got these correct went about doing them. My…
... that bulging disks is only a partial factor.
... of this kind of like a compound sufficient condition. (Conditional ... that if A and B then C. But a question has A and not C, so ... reference the possible existence of B (until you see “partly ... -
PT58.S1.Q11 & PT62.S4.Q19: Come on, where's the 7sage community! My post is getting ignored!I just couldn't anticipate the flaws with either of these questions and would like to know how people who got these correct went about doing them. My…
... of this kind of like a compound sufficient condition. (Conditional ... that if A and B then C. But a question has A and not C, so ... reference the possible existence of B (until you see “partly ... /> Cause: X (Bulging disks+ factor A), Effect: Y (Pain)
PT63.S3.Q11 - Web Medical Info5 star NA question. Is this a triple conclusion passage? Looking for another opinion on this question regarding the stimulus. This passage str…
... a pretty straightforward A to B to C relationship, where A and B collectively support C ... with just B C and E.
C is about ... />
E is a strange necessary relationship ("only if ... br />
B gives us a nice, snug sufficiency relationship ...PT29.S1.Q18 and PT2.S2.Q24 - Help!!! Logic ContradictionsHi, can any LR guru help take a look at the two following LR questions? PT29 1-18 PT2 2-24 Details: PT29 1-18: Most of artists are less ins…
... I didn't actually find a some or most relationship here.
_Artist -most-> Less Politically Insightful than ... correct answer is that some artists are NOT Less ... Well-educated Non-Artists, because most absolutely can include all. ...PTF97.S3.Q20 - Criminals released from prison on parole..Can someone explain why AC C is right and E is wrong. Option C states that "the proportion of arrests to crimes committed was not significantly h…
... mainly got stuck between AC C & D.
... supervision).
A: irrelevant
B: irrelevant
C: Yes - this shows ... author draws, it is a blocking NA bc blocks it ... the support comes from a percentage and not a raw number. the ...A ---> B --SOME--> C; therefore A ----> C, is that a valid argument?A ---> B --SOME--> C; therefore A ----> C, is that a valid argument? I know A ---Some--> C is an invalid argument, but I am unsure about the not so…
A ---> B --SOME--> C; therefore A ----> C, is that a valid argument?
I know A ---Some--> C is an invalid argument, but I am unsure about the not some situation.7Sagers, is there a single LR question that taught you the most? Come in and post!7Sagers, is there an example of a LR question that you have deconstructed front to back that really paid dividends for you? I’m not talking about m…
... something that resolved the paradox (C) and wrote “Easy!” in ... whether (A) or (B) actually resolves the paradox more. (A) carries ... contained within the nebulous “most” retail category in which ... to have to sometimes make some assumptions, make them cautiously ...a unless b but only if c.For instance, a -> (b -> c) simplifies to a + -b -> -c. What about (-a -> b) -> c. How can I simplify it?
For instance, a -> (b -> c) simplifies to a + -b -> -c. What about (-a -> b) -> c. How can I simplify it?PT49.S2.Q11 - cholesterol, which is a known factor in coronary heart diseasehttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-49-section-2-question-11/ While the right answer choice is very clear to me, it would be great if someone co…
... B correlates with C?
*My intuition would say NO, because A most B, A most C ... , only implies B some C.
Similarly,
Anybody know the month and year of the Superprep II C test? (just got a copy, booklet doesn't say)My copy of the Superprep II booklet just arrived, and much to my dismay, LSAC does not indicate what month and year that the C test is. Considerin…
... that the C test is.
Considering that A and B are ... br />
Anyhow, here's some info about the test if ... .
Game 3 involves a costumer designer having to put ... tough)
Game 4 involves a radio station scheduling interviews with ...RC Annotation Method and BR (Most Authoritarian Rulers Passage pt.2)Hey guys after watching Nicole Hopkins' webinar on RC Methods and Jimmy Quicksilver's webinar on RC Question Types and Tips I thought it would be hel…
... attitude toward authoritarian regimes is most accurately described as which of ... matter correct. And there were some talks of economics in the ... that just because there are some elements of things that you ... good answer”, similar to “A”, “B”, and “C”I t’s what we ...PT30.S4.Q20 - consumer advocate: the introduction of a new drughttps://7sage.com/lesson/introducing-new-drugs-strengthen-question Looking to get a better idea of the logic on answer choice E, which is an incor…
... @DumbHollywoodActor was helpful in shedding some light on E's logic ... see it more clearly: “if most new drugs shouldn’t be ... not be on the market (A)
C: these new drugs should ... looking at that B--> A statement, and holding A and B in my ...Quick some statement questionI have: <b>G most F ------------------ C some G</b> I am trying to conclude <b>C some G</b>, but I am a bit confused. To me this: <b>G m…
... trying to conclude C some G, but I am a bit confused.
To me this: G most F ---> C ... concludes G most C, and not G some C.
Can G most C ... and G some C ...If A, then B, which cannot happen without CWhat would be the correct way to diagram this? A->B->C Or (A->B)->C
What would be the correct way to diagram this?
A->B->C
Or
(A->B)->CA is a "significant factor" in most BIf A (driving over the speed limit) is a significant factor in most B (accidents), can I establish a causal relationship between the two? Can I dr…
If A (driving over the speed limit) is a significant factor in most B (accidents), can I establish a causal relationship between the two?
Can I draw A ---M --> B?
#help
Thank you in advance!LR Study Guide*I was sent this LR study guide a couple of months ago from a fellow 7Sager and it has been very helpful. It's not as detailed as some of the others…
... not as detailed as some of the others floating ... main point
Most Strongly Supported Questions
- ... A caused B
2. B caused A
3. C caused both A and B< ... - Validity is the strongest most special relationship between premises and ...Getting out of a plateauI am consistently scoring in the low 160s (160-163) and scoring in the mid 160s to low 170s (166-172) after BR. Do any of you have any suggestions o…
... how to get out of a plateau. On BR, I immediately ... , including 1-35 and PT A,B and C. Would it be helpful ... of them as a PT, or should I save some of them ...
