@"AccountsPlayable" said:
Part of me wants to attribute the difficulty of this question to the fact that it's an old question, but that seems like a cop out.
Makes me glad I didn’t try to get into law school in the early 90s.
@"AccountsPlayable" would you add a math section at the expense of the LG section or one of the LR sections? Would you add a new section all together? I'm curious!
@"AccountsPlayable" Also, I'm assuming that the only time that "or" is not inclusive is when they specifically say "not both"? Is that a correct assumption? Or are there instances where they may not specify but the "or" is exclusive?
@"AccountsPlayable" said:
4 lengthy wrong answer choices, and if it were me writing the question, I'd make the test taker have to sift through A-D first