HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| are | 60.1K | 107.4K |
| logical | 3K | 3.9K |
| reasoning | 5.5K | 7.4K |
| questions | 30.6K | 56K |
| harder | 3.8K | 4.5K |
| in | 105.1K | 243.1K |
| the | 164.5K | 768.7K |
| 70s | 996 | 1.3K |
-
Tempe/Mesa/PHX, AZAnybody from this area interested in starting a study group? I will be taking the Blueprint LSAT course in April and supplementing it with 7sage
There are a few of us in the Phoenix area but nothing's been solidifies yet. When will you be taking the test? -
Read this article for some clarity on science concepts you'll likely encounter on the LSATI'm shamelessly copying this from the front page of reddit: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01100/full Owing to the sh…
... like antidepressants, are prevalent even within the medical community. ... the entries in the article, it does sound like many of these are ... used inappropriately not only in the vernacular ... but also frequently in research ... -
Question DifficultyI have a quick question I am confused on. Does every section on the LSAT start with the easiest questions, then progressively move on to the hardest?…
... been known to include difficult questions somewhere in the middle (say, 12, 13 ... , 14, etc.) and somewhat easy questions towards the ... end (21, 22, 23, etc.).
In the past ... -
How do you drill ?This is both a general question and a question directed to any person who is reading this (how do <i>you</i> drill?) Let's say I miss a few weaken …
... problem sets when going through the curriculum exactly for this purpose ... a ready made chunk of questions, but in the absence of that you ... can use the question bank and make ... ledger of questions I've missed and redo them in lieu of ... -
Anecdotal evidence that the 70s PTs are different from 50s and 60s PTsHere's my anecdotal evidence that the 70s PTs are harder (or at least different) from earlier modern PTs. PTs 54-59, 61, 62, 65, 66 (Not cherry pi…
On the 30 - mid-60s tests ... -2) on LRs and now in the 70s it's not uncommon for ... Hugely demoralizing considering how close the date is and how well ... doing to the point (consistently 172-175 ten tests in a ... row and now the last 3 I've taking in the 70s have been ... -
Official June LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official June LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the June 2016 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... LG sections I've had in the 70s. RC was brutal.
in UK courtrooms, Musical Iconography (?) and ... . Physics. Don't quite remember the third passage which took me ... -
June 2016 LSAT Score Predicition ThreadI'm bored at lunch so I decided to ask you guys what scores do you think you earned on the June LSAT. As usual in my threads, I will go first. I thin…
HEY I CAN DO THIS NOw!!!
I think, depending on curve and confidence errors, I probably scored between 167 and 172. But also, I've been overconfident a couple times in the 70s series so I'm trying not to get too hypheeee -
Achieving ConsistencyHello 7Sage world! Need some advice. So, I have taken 10 PTs up to this point. Scores are all over the place, but I am definitely seeing progres…
@"Darth Jurist" you didn't mention which PTs they were, I remember going from the 50's or 60's to the 70's initially would produce some inconsistent scores for me, but again w/only 10 you are still pretty rely on in the process. -
How to progress on this low 140s??I finally took a full PT. I chose PT76 under time limit with 144. I finished most of the LG class and ready for LR course on. My goal is to enter 17…
... more of the tests in the 70s until you have worked through the entire 7Sage ... I am not familiar with the the LSAT Blog Schedule, but I ... recommended that you go in order of the lessons. https://7sage. ... />
Some people read the trainer as they go through ... -
Questions for those scoring in the 169+ range<b>For those who once were scoring well below the 169+ mark</b>, what were some of the larger breakthroughs in your prep that allowed you to finally …
@"Ron Swanson" Yeah I forgot to mention that but 100% agree. It's almost as if it's just assumed you need to be in the range for games lol. What really astonishes me is that there are people out there scoring in the 170s and missing entire games! Wild.
