Like Raptor said, it is circularreasoning. If you see something similar to this wording on the actual test - don't think about it too much. The wording is confusing but the choice itself sounds bit 'circular', which should hint at that concept to you.
Hey group, I’m going to start putting together a cookie cutter flaw spreadsheet to better assist us in identify repeat flaws. We spotted circularreasoning last night. A link will be forthcoming.
Well for most of the LSAT's history CircularReasoning was a throwaway flaw that was just never the correct answer choice. Then along came a PT in the 80's and well..you'll see
one of my favorite examples is "Circularreasoning works because Circularreasoning works" the why part of the argument just feeds into what its attempting to prove.
... : classic flaws ( sufficiency/ necessity confusion, circularreasoning ect) and also arguments which ... are flawed because the evidence/ reasoning doesn’t support the conclusion ...