HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| cookie | 574 | 757 |
| cutter | 402 | 517 |
| akistotle | 2.7K | 3.1K |
-
Simplified study sheet for studying Formal Logic?Hey guys! So I really struggle with really grasping formal logic. It's just one of those things that I just can't seem to understand. I'll underst…
> @jennybbbbb said:
> @akistotle @"Alex Divine"
>
& ... -
LSAC Chronograph Ban - this includes LSAT watchesApparently, LSAC has included chronographs as one of the other devices that are banned in the testing center. Does this mean that LSAT specific watch…
> @westcoastbestcoast said:
> @akistotle that is the one
I have the same one! But I'm also using Casio.... Maybe I'll bring both. -
LSAC Chronograph Ban - this includes LSAT watchesApparently, LSAC has included chronographs as one of the other devices that are banned in the testing center. Does this mean that LSAT specific watch…
@akistotle I'm thinking of bring both just in case. Having a rotating bezel might be more convenient since it takes longer to pull and the push down crown to reset the time as opposed to just rotating a bezel. -
Forum Awards - Chattels for ChatterboxesHey 7Sagers, you all have built a caring and all-round awesome community here on the discussion forums. As a small thank you to just a few of the ma…
... giftcard
@"vanessa fisher"
@"akistotle"
@"uhinberg"
@"goingfor99th"
Forum Awards - Chattels for ChatterboxesHey 7Sagers, you all have built a caring and all-round awesome community here on the discussion forums. As a small thank you to just a few of the ma…
... /> > @"vanessa fisher"
> @"akistotle"
> @"uhinberg"
> ..."if all and only those" -- biconditional?Hello, I was working on PT35.S4.Q11, and came across the expression "if all and only those", and it seemed to me as a biconditional indicator, bu…
Thanks @akistotle for the reference.
I deleted it, sorry about that!!PT3.S2.Q25 - the public in the united statesI can't see why E is a better AC that D. Any thoughts? Flaw Argument Summary: Context: The presence of X has conditioned the US to support a …
... wrong. Thanks for your help @akistotle
Exactly. (D) is ...Letters of RecommendationHey 7Sagers! In terms of submitting LOR to LSAC - once the professor gets the link, do they submit only one LOR and then we distribute the same l…
... ; @goodbhaviour said:
> > @akistotle said:
> > > ...Typo in Problem Sets/Logic Games Bundle?In the 7Sage version of PT33 and in the Logic Games Bundle, PT33.S4.Q14 (LG) says: "most be true" http://imgur.com/yPG9YaW I paused for like t…
... . Wright" said:
> > @akistotle said:
> > @"Dillon ...Georgetown Accepts GRE!!http://www.law.com/sites/almstaff/2017/08/07/georgetown-joins-list-of-top-law-schools-using-gre-for-admissions/
... Divine" said:
> > @akistotle said:
> > Wow ...Georgetown Accepts GRE!!http://www.law.com/sites/almstaff/2017/08/07/georgetown-joins-list-of-top-law-schools-using-gre-for-admissions/
> @akistotle said:
> > @"Alex ... " said:
> > > @akistotle said:
> > > ...If J.Y. took a new LSAT, would he get a 180?I feel since J.Y. has drawn out detailed explanations of almost every LSAT question in existence, that he, if anyone, would stand the best chance at …
@akistotle thats how I pictured him before @"Cant Get Right" called him fat! :DIf J.Y. took a new LSAT, would he get a 180?I feel since J.Y. has drawn out detailed explanations of almost every LSAT question in existence, that he, if anyone, would stand the best chance at …
> @LSATcantwin said:
> @akistotle thats how I pictured him before @"Cant Get Right" called him fat! :D
https://media.giphy.com/media/l41JZPyTD6b9oNDwc/giphy.gifIf J.Y. took a new LSAT, would he get a 180?I feel since J.Y. has drawn out detailed explanations of almost every LSAT question in existence, that he, if anyone, would stand the best chance at …
@akistotle
https://31.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lum55wl03h1qiol6o.gifIf J.Y. took a new LSAT, would he get a 180?I feel since J.Y. has drawn out detailed explanations of almost every LSAT question in existence, that he, if anyone, would stand the best chance at …
> @akistotle said:
> > @uhinberg ... somewhere.
Thank you, Akistotle! :)
