@SoltanShah, you're definitely going about this the right way! The better you know your fundamentals, the better you'll be able to handle the curve breakers.
What type of coding? I know Coursera classes for coding are supposed to be helpful. I took the R programming course, liked the setup, but did feel it has a pretty steep learning curve
Later later later! There is definitely a shift after PT65 and while it is subtle, you will be thrown a curve ball if you're not prepared by being exposed to the most modern tests.
72 will F your day up if you're not an Analytical Reasoning champion. But, the curve was also slightly adjusted. Case-in-point, you can get 12 wrong for a 170 on PT 72, but only get 11 wrong for a 170 on PT 73 and 74
Hey, on the bright side, I haven't heard one comment yet that the test was "easy." Maybe we'll get a curve better than on PT 72.. where 12 wrong was a 170 and 28 wrong was a 160.
@Legal Babe.. definitely flawed. I am not trying to be a dick, but seriously, you can't really hang your hat on that. Additionally, your particular testing center being empty doesn't do anything.. the curve is based on all like 20,000 test takers.
The last game was a killer for most people, which leads me to hope that even with -12 a 170 is still possible (curve). This is the only reason I'm considering not cancelling and just seeing my darn score. Ugh.