HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| existential | 164 | 242 |
| quantifiers | 147 | 224 |
| contrapositives | 183 | 223 |
-
What are your thoughts on the Existential Quantifiers section?I primarily got the base of my knowledge from LSAT Trainer and PowerScore books and came to 7sage for mainly LG but also to improve on LR to further …
... of these lessons about existential quantifiers have just confused ... /post/ep-278-part-1-existential-quantifiers-crisis
... ’t quite understand “existential quantifiers,” hard as he ... have no idea what “existential quantifiers” even means—especially ... -
Negating/denying Universal quantifiersHey, I know that there were lessons on denying existential quantifiers, but I couldn't find one for the universal quantifiers... Can you please…
Hey,
I know that there were lessons on denying existential quantifiers, but I couldn't find one for the universal quantifiers...
Can you please tell me how to deny statements with existential quantifiers?
Thanks -
Can a NA answer have a "most" existential quantifier?I always get confused between the NA answers that states A most B and a subtle conditional (the correct answer). During the BR, I am able to correct …
... />
I know that other existential quantifiers, such as some, can still ... -
Difference between negation and contrapositive?I've been through the 'Some and Most Relationships' module once....and twice...but am still unclear on the exact difference between a contrapositive …
... RELATIONSHIPS
EXISTENTIAL QUANTIFIERS OVERVIEW Lesson 1 of 30
• Existential quantifiers are intersectional ... /> **Remember that there are no contrapositives for these intersection relationships. They ... -
LR Study Guides ThreadI was wondering if we could upload our study guides in this post for those taking the June and upcoming LSATs can always come back to this.
... RELATIONSHIPS
EXISTENTIAL QUANTIFIERS OVERVIEW Lesson 1 of 30
• Existential quantifiers are intersectional ... /> **Remember that there are no contrapositives for these intersection relationships. They ... -
Many and MostCan someone please explain if there is a logical difference between "many" and "most?" I remember reading or watching in one of the logic lesson vide…
... Condition & Necessary Condition)
• Existential quantifiers
Relationship – intersection instead of ... - it does NOT exist for EXISTENTIAL QUANTIFIERS
“SOME” STATEMENTS MEANING ... subset of “some”
• NO CONTRAPOSITIVES! -
No contrapositive for some.When some equals 100%, why wouldn't the counter positive be valid?
... "some" and "none" being the contrapositives of "some". This is perhaps ... the Schrodinger's cat of existential quantifiers. Without peering inside the box ... -
How much can I imporve my LSAT?I know this is a common topic, however I'm new to this forum sooooo I figured I might as well share my diagnostic and see if anyone has any advice or…
... conditional logic, causation, bi-conditionals, contrapositives, degrees of validity, the differences ... conditional diagramming, chaining conditional diagramming, existential quantifiers, logical indicators and their respective ... -
Question on contrapositive for some and iffHi all! So I need some clarifications...! Please help! Contrapositive for "some" doesn't exist because it's reversible. A <-s-> /B (Some A …
... the original. Contrapositives are inherently equivalent. None of the existential quantifiers (some and ... because it is using universal quantifiers and doing so would create ... : you **can't** contrapose when existential quantifiers (some and most) are present ... -
Question on contrapositive for some and iffHi all! So I need some clarifications...! Please help! Contrapositive for "some" doesn't exist because it's reversible. A <-s-> /B (Some A …
... original. Contrapositives are inherently equivalent. None of the existential quantifiers (some ... **can't** contrapose when existential quantifiers (some and most) are ... you **can** contrapose when universal quantifiers are present
A confusion relates to Lawgic and Sufficent Assumption QuestionsI am very confused with a specific relationship between universal quantifiers and existential quantifiers. This confusion becomes annoying in Assumpt…
... a specific relationship between universal quantifiers and existential quantifiers. This confusion becomes annoying ...A specific Lawgic Confusion and Assumption QuestionsI am very confused with a specific relationship between universal quantifiers and existential quantifiers. This confusion becomes annoying in Assumpt…
... a specific relationship between universal quantifiers and existential quantifiers. This confusion becomes annoying ...Valid Argument FormsI'm just going through the lesson on Valid Argument Forms now and I was wondering for which questions are the existential quantifiers relevant? I gu…
... for which questions are the existential quantifiers relevant? I guess I'm ...ValiditySo the valid argument forms are used for MBT, SA questions and logic games only or am I missing something else? Also what about existential quantifie…
... something else? Also what about existential quantifiers? Will we mostly see them ...JY Read me!Hi JY, I've been getting through the curriculum at my own pace this last year, but I'd just like to say thank you so much for creating this curri…
... rules cannot be applied to existential quantifiers. It was a huge moment ...Understanding why "some are not" is the negation of "all"In the existential quantifiers lessons, JY explains how to negate statements with the universal quantifier "all." The conclusion was that "some are n…
In the existential quantifiers lessons, JY explains how to ...MBT, SA, ParalellSo the common denominator between all 3 of these question types is..logic. I have been through the curriculum multiple times. I know how to translat…
... memorized the indicators. I understand existential quantifiers.
Why am i struggling ...how to handle group 3 indicators + existential quantifiers i.e. PT 33.3.8 most people invest withouthttps://7sage.com/lesson/invest-in-the-stock-market-mbt-question/?ss_completed_lesson=1089 most people invest without doing any research of their …
https://7sage.com/lesson/invest-in-the-stock-market-mbt-question/?ss_completed_lesson=1089
most people invest without doing any research of their own
Intuitively I would want to lawgic it out like people who invest -m--> / ...Lower Bound for 'Some' - why is it 1 and not 2?Can anyone please explain to me why the lower bound for ‘some’ is 1 and not 2? Is there no distinction in logic between a singular instance of someth…
... ’ example from the lessons on existential quantifiers. J.Y. concludes that if ...Logical Reasoning Help!Hi everyone, I am currently studying existential quantifiers and although I understand the concept of existential quantifiers, I find it difficult…
... with existential quantifiers, but was wondering whether you need to use existential quantifiers ... questions require us to use existential quantifiers?
If possible, ... that require us to utilize existential quantifiers? I would greatly appreciate ...Negation Help !Some A's are not B's A's -----> not B 's (some) What if I want to negate some A's are not B's? would the negation be .... …
EXISTENTIAL QUANTIFIERS BRIEF Lesson 3of 30
• ... - it does NOT exist for EXISTENTIAL QUANTIFIERS
“SOME” STATEMENTS MEANING ...LR Study Guides ThreadI was wondering if we could upload our study guides in this post for those taking the June and upcoming LSATs can always come back to this.
... 20
Universal quantifiers: sufficient/necessity relationship
Existential quantifiers: intersection relationship
ValiditySo the valid argument forms are used for MBT, SA questions and logic games only or am I missing something else? Also what about existential quantifie…
The valid argument forms and the existential quantifiers can appear anywhere on the LSAT, not only in particular types of questions. Sure, they may appear more frequently in certain types of questions, but it's not a hard and fast rule.PT49.S2.Q11 - cholesterol, which is a known factor in coronary heart diseasehttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-49-section-2-question-11/ While the right answer choice is very clear to me, it would be great if someone co…
... deal with the question of existential quantifiers in terms of correlation as ...How often do you guys diagram for MBT and SA Questions?Still unsure of what the best approach is when doing these questions on a timed exam. The Trainer advocates using intuition while 7sage seems to enco…
... diagram are clear logical indicators/existential quantifiers (the latter more for MbT ...7Sage vs. VelocityHi guys, I'm new here. Someone might ask the same question before, but I'm wondering if any of you have used/are using both Velocity and 7Sage? I…
... as the entire part about existential quantifiers).
2.) Also, I ...Negating/denying Universal quantifiersHey, I know that there were lessons on denying existential quantifiers, but I couldn't find one for the universal quantifiers... Can you please…
... /lesson/the-negation/
Existential Quantifiers
http://7sage.com/lesson ...What is the negation of "not many"?How do you negate "not many"? To me, you can't just dropped the "not". Here's my thought process: "Not many" seems to be the same as "some not…
... attempt to contort natural language quantifiers, such as "most, many, more ... doomed project because the universal/existential quantifiers ("all"/"some") of first-order ... syntactic behavior of all generalized quantifiers.
Here is a ...What is the negation of "not many"?How do you negate "not many"? To me, you can't just dropped the "not". Here's my thought process: "Not many" seems to be the same as "some not…
... doomed project because the universal/existential quantifiers ("all"/"some") of first-order ... syntactic behavior of all generalized quantifiers.
I think ... reinforces the idea that these quantifiers deal with natural language rather ...Logical ReasoningCan anybody tell me what logical reasoning questions that you must be wary of extreme language (only, whenever, all, etc) when approaching? I know in…
... on because of universal or existential quantifiers; some search engines VS all ...
