HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| first | 22.4K | 29.8K |
| lr | 21.3K | 37.4K |
| section | 23.2K | 38.1K |
-
WTF is up with PT 73's difficulty??Just took this PT and got wrecked... like... 13 points lower than how I did on PT 72. My last 4 or 5 PTs have all fallen within a 5 point spread, bu…
I just took this PT and got absolutely wrecked by the first LR section. It was nothing short of demoralizing/made me want to cancel my upcoming exam -
PT 82 BR Sessions with J.Y. [Spoiler Warning]Hey 7Sagers, I'm leading BR calls for PT 82 (September 2017 LSAT). I'm holding 6 sessions total. 2 for each of LR 1, LR 2, and RC. Each session w…
... particular. I also thought the first LR section was more difficult than average ... -
Official December LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official December LSAT Discussion Thread. <b>Please keep all discussions of the December 2017 LSAT here!</b> Here's some grou…
... the LR sections are:
First LR 25: prodevelopment was the first question ...
Second LR 25 ... , I honestly thought that the first LR section was the hardest and second ... -
Official December LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official December LSAT Discussion Thread. <b>Please keep all discussions of the December 2017 LSAT here!</b> Here's some grou…
... ;
> First LR 25: prodevelopment was the first question
> ... ;
> Second LR 25: ... honestly thought that the first LR section was the hardest and ... one is the experimental section which is pretty upsetting ... -
Official December LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official December LSAT Discussion Thread. <b>Please keep all discussions of the December 2017 LSAT here!</b> Here's some grou…
... order of mine was LR (25) RC LR (25) LR (26) LG. I ... under the impression that the first LR section was the experimental one, but ... it appears that the second LR section was the experimental one instead ... s true, I found the first LR section quite a bit harder than ... -
Official December LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official December LSAT Discussion Thread. <b>Please keep all discussions of the December 2017 LSAT here!</b> Here's some grou…
... order of mine was LR (25) RC LR (25) LR (26) LG. I ... under the impression that the first LR section was the experimental one, but ... it appears that the second LR section was the experimental one instead ... s true, I found the first LR section quite a bit harder than ... -
Official December LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official December LSAT Discussion Thread. <b>Please keep all discussions of the December 2017 LSAT here!</b> Here's some grou…
... order of mine was LR (25) RC LR (25) LR (26) LG. I ... under the impression that the first LR section was the experimental one, but ... it appears that the second LR section was the experimental one instead ... s true, I found the first LR section quite a bit harder than ... -
Official December LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official December LSAT Discussion Thread. <b>Please keep all discussions of the December 2017 LSAT here!</b> Here's some grou…
... order of mine was LR (25) RC LR (25) LR (26) LG. I ... under the impression that the first LR section was the experimental one, but ... it appears that the second LR section was the experimental one instead ... s true, I found the first LR section quite a bit harder than ... -
Official December LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official December LSAT Discussion Thread. <b>Please keep all discussions of the December 2017 LSAT here!</b> Here's some grou…
... 3 LRs, PERHAPS someone's first LR was someone else's 2nd ... or 3rd LR.
Now this is my first time taking ... specific questions associated to each LR section, and so I ask according ... as I'm concerned, the first LR section was harder than the next ... -
Official December LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official December LSAT Discussion Thread. <b>Please keep all discussions of the December 2017 LSAT here!</b> Here's some grou…
... two LR26s then the 3rd section was experimental.
> If ... two LR25 then the 1st section was experimental.
I ... the mayoral question in the first LR section. Are you sure this is ... -
Official December LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official December LSAT Discussion Thread. <b>Please keep all discussions of the December 2017 LSAT here!</b> Here's some grou…
... two LR26s then the 3rd section was experimental.
> > ... two LR25 then the 1st section was experimental.
> < ... the mayoral question in the first LR section. Are you sure this is ... Tilapia question in the 3rd section—the second LR section. -
Diagnostic 142; BR 148. PT36 after CC a 146; BR 148.Decent improvement? Is there hope? Or is this too terrible for any hope? Ha. Wasn't much of a jump. Although I am glad it went up rather than dow…
I also did better on RC, which I believe was due to the fact that I was genuinely interested in the readings. I only got about 9 right on the first LR section, and then 15 or 16 right in the second LR. -
Diagnostic 142; BR 148. PT36 after CC a 146; BR 148.Decent improvement? Is there hope? Or is this too terrible for any hope? Ha. Wasn't much of a jump. Although I am glad it went up rather than dow…
Agree with everything that's been said. I would also suggest maybe warming up before the test? The first LR section being significantly lower than the second might just mean you're warmed up enough - same thing happened to me. -
Diagnostic 142; BR 148. PT36 after CC a 146; BR 148.Decent improvement? Is there hope? Or is this too terrible for any hope? Ha. Wasn't much of a jump. Although I am glad it went up rather than dow…
... I am halfway through the first LR section and I know the answers ... this way for the LG section, but should I take PT ... -
Diagnostic 142; BR 148. PT36 after CC a 146; BR 148.Decent improvement? Is there hope? Or is this too terrible for any hope? Ha. Wasn't much of a jump. Although I am glad it went up rather than dow…
... I am halfway through the first LR section and I know the answers ... this way for the LG section, but should I take PT ... -
February LSAT Discussion ThreadIs there an official thread for this? I need a distraction (or destruction) <b>Admin note: edited title</b>
@joanyou9382 First and third sound real to me. I had experimental RC, but definitely recognized the questions you mention from your first LR section. -
February LSAT Discussion ThreadIs there an official thread for this? I need a distraction (or destruction) <b>Admin note: edited title</b>
... beatles section.
>
> Can anyone confirm second LR is ... and both LR questions you mentioned for each remaining section, i had ... than i did for the first LR section, so I guess I have ... -
February LSAT Discussion ThreadIs there an official thread for this? I need a distraction (or destruction) <b>Admin note: edited title</b>
... confirmed with WB and beatles section.
> >
first one was experimental ... both LR questions you mentioned for each remaining section, i ... i did for the first LR section, so I guess I ... m not sure what section was oil prices. ... -
February LSAT Discussion ThreadIs there an official thread for this? I need a distraction (or destruction) <b>Admin note: edited title</b>
I think that means the 2nd LR section is experimental for LR LG LR LR RC.
Ivy is real and it was in the first LR section.
UFO is real and it was in the third LR section. -
Plataeu at 164 -- what to do?Plateauing at 164, started at a 144 in June, so I'm stoked on the improvement. My goal is to get a 170+ on the June LSAT, so I want to be PTing above…
... 160s.
On my first LR section on test day, I had ... the end. In that same section, I skipped from question #18 ... that was the highest raw section score for my entire ... skipping all throughout this section. In my second LR section, I worked linearly ... -
June'18 Study Group | Blind Review PT 72 | Tuesday, April 24th | 7:30 pm ESTJune'18 Study Group | Blind Review PT 72 | Tuesday, April 24th | 7:30 pm EST https://media.giphy.com/media/CFNyzQcxs8JJ6/giphy.gif I hope you'r…
Me too Dave- I found the first LR section (Section 2) to be especially trying. -
Significant difference between 1st and 2nd LR sections during timed PTHey all, In every single practice test I've taken, I've had a significant difference in score in my first and second LR sections. First section I …
Your brain might be "warming up" during the first LR section. -
⭐️ Official June 2018 LSAT Discussion Thread ⭐️Hey guys! Here's the official June 2018 LSAT Discussion Thread. <b><u>Please keep all discussions of the June 2018 LSAT here!</u> </b> We know …
... . According to Reddit, the first LR section was experimental and the two ... little psyched out during that first section. -
⭐️ Official June 2018 LSAT Discussion Thread ⭐️Hey guys! Here's the official June 2018 LSAT Discussion Thread. <b><u>Please keep all discussions of the June 2018 LSAT here!</u> </b> We know …
For anybody that had LR RC LR LR LG - did your first LR section have like three points of disagreement questions? Or if anybody did NOT have an LR experimental, do you remember if this was the case for any of the real LR questions? -
⭐️ Official June 2018 LSAT Discussion Thread ⭐️Hey guys! Here's the official June 2018 LSAT Discussion Thread. <b><u>Please keep all discussions of the June 2018 LSAT here!</u> </b> We know …
... the questions were in that first LR section that had all of the ... -
⭐️ Official June 2018 LSAT Discussion Thread ⭐️Hey guys! Here's the official June 2018 LSAT Discussion Thread. <b><u>Please keep all discussions of the June 2018 LSAT here!</u> </b> We know …
Are we allowed now to talk about specific questions?? I'm having a real rough time understanding #24 on the first LR section. The theories of criminal sentencing. -
⭐️ Official June 2018 LSAT Discussion Thread ⭐️Hey guys! Here's the official June 2018 LSAT Discussion Thread. <b><u>Please keep all discussions of the June 2018 LSAT here!</u> </b> We know …
... time understanding #24 on the first LR section. The theories of criminal sentencing ... -
⭐️ Official June 2018 LSAT Discussion Thread ⭐️Hey guys! Here's the official June 2018 LSAT Discussion Thread. <b><u>Please keep all discussions of the June 2018 LSAT here!</u> </b> We know …
... time understanding #24 on the first LR section. The theories of criminal sentencing ... -
just took my first post-CC PT...and I bombed it. I'm not shocked because I knew when I finished LR and LG that I wasn't solid in my understanding of the methods, rules, etc. so,…
... be done. my worst section was LG, which I ... half worth of questions. LR was troublesome but I felt ... in my answers in the first LR section, though not so much ... in the second section.
my ... properly apply lawgic to the LR questions. for LG, ... -
just took my first post-CC PT...and I bombed it. I'm not shocked because I knew when I finished LR and LG that I wasn't solid in my understanding of the methods, rules, etc. so,…
... be done. my worst section was LG, which I ... half worth of questions. LR was troublesome but I ... in my answers in the first LR section, though not so much ... in the second section.
>
> ... properly apply lawgic to the LR questions. for LG, ...
