Agreed with other posters that the flaws for the number related stimuli tend to be centered on percentage to part fallacies. But i did notice that these types of stimuli do not tend to showup as much in the more recent PTs.
@LSATKingsman So you're saying that the newer games are, as a rule, more familiar? There is a smaller chance now that something unfamiliar or new will showup on test day?
@"Cant Get Right" What is the average amount of time between a game showing up on an experimental and it showing up on the actual test? Is it a guarantee that a given game on an experimental will showup on an actual?
full-timed PTs. If you ... makes sense to jump into full tests. Especially because you ... put off taking full tests end up doing a lot ... time studying curricula end up doing much better. When ...
This is another great reason to not waste takes. If you knock it out the first time, you can showup to two LSATS and just do this throughout the entire test.
I just died 5x while reading this thread. This is by far my greatest fear. LSAC really needs to make this exam computerized. What happens if the exams showup after you retest?
I agree with calling to make sure, but they most likely are only talking about college. College suspensions showup on your transcripts; I don't think HS ones do.
@"Jonathan Wang" Thanks for that explanation. I second @montaha.rizeq If you dropped in there and did an informal talk that would definitely help and I'd showup!
@"Dillon A. Wright" Thanks for the cool resource. I'll check it out!
... (unless there's too much up there, then they'll be ... put up as they become closer to ... " subsection!) and will usually go up anywhere between a week and ... them -- etc?