I am a bit confused on howto use "without" when ... writing out conditionals. I understand ... that you negate the sufficient when you see the ... (this one makes more sense to me)
... anywhere from 160 and up. I study pretty consistently and take ... did the Loophole LR book. I am missing 9-12 questions ... don't know howI can change my studying tosee improvements. Right now ... I have just been ...
... to think abstractly and not so cookie cutter) and then recycling gamesI've ... already done to make sure I can see the ... a massive improvement from howI started out which was ... instead of doing individual games and timing them individually ...
... games covered. I thought the same as you, that I will never see ... sections, as opposed to individual games (I'm planning to use the LR/RC ... -4 "old" sections that you've done before and the "new ... once cold, then depending on how it went watch the videos ...
@melloish said: I've noticed that reading the powerscore ... . It kind of taught me howto diagram games, but as far as ... might see on the test first. I also think it is wise to ... at least be able to diagram most games after going through the ...
... you are going tosee and apply to future games. Sometimes I do gamesI've never seen ... game deja vu. I already know the inferences / howto diagram from another ... similar game I fool proofed.
... you are going tosee and apply to future games. Sometimes I do gamesI've never seen ... game deja vu. I already know the inferences / howto diagram from another ... similar game I fool proofed.
... teach you howto make inferences. I'm not sure how far you've gotten ... your rules you have to be able tosee more than just what ... an inference that I didn't make. Some games hinge on inferences ... others don't. Also, the games that depend on numbers have ...
... games and some people drilled mixed games. I've done it both ways and I ... . With mixed games you'll be able to better seehow you'll react ... like games. You need to know howto react for each game type. I think ...
... Yeah I think it is highly probable that you will see your ... the LSAT makers started changing how they frame stimuli and ... likely to make under such conditions.
The LG games ... of the passages has to be solid. I've seen more comparative passages ...
I've played guitar almost my entire life and Isee some of the similarities ... with the LSAT I've found that its not about how much you ... the test because I constantly go back to the ones I've saved on ... CC I wanted to brush up on (SA, Games, and RC), but I plan ...
... sure to BR everything - I've started doing it for LR, logic games, and ... but I think I've now irritated myself with how much time I've already piddled ... hours I've set out for myself for a few months tosee ... whether it's helping or if going to a ...
I think preparation for logic games ... to skip whole games and then come back to them, familiarity: knowing howto approach games ... pressure of a remaining game, see things clear and go 3 ...
... . However, I've seen marginal, if any, improvements. When I foolproof them, I can ... since last summer) 3. Howto maximize what I learn from the Fool ... -doing......) before I finally started tosee new games and be like I got this ...
... logic material), and I took a test tosee if I had improved my ... on howto improve without taking more tests, but, I fear if I take ... answer is almost always to "fool proof" all games. Start with the ... be taking.
... , it would be difficult to apply later. I've already taken basically 2 ... limiting splits for in/out games, do you mean like, if ... and see where it is you went wrong.
I've taken ... tells me, that's not how learning the LSAT works.
... a long time I'd always try tosee if I could make ... time trying to figure out howto split gameboards only to realize that ...
Just recently I've been trying to focus on strategy. I've been doing tons ... this strategy, I did notice that when games have a lot ...
... sections untimed is probably where I've seen most of my improvements ... ; Where are you scoring and how far off are you from ... was 157, BR 169 (I was surprised tosee such a big difference ... just by fool proofing logic games or increasing your conditional logic ...
... sections untimed is probably where I've seen most of my improvements ... ; Where are you scoring and how far off are you from ... was 157, BR 169 (I was surprised tosee such a big difference ... just by fool proofing logic games or increasing your conditional logic ...
... sections untimed is probably where I've seen most of my improvements ... ; Where are you scoring and how far off are you from ... was 157, BR 169 (I was surprised tosee such a big difference ... just by fool proofing logic games or increasing your conditional logic ...
... more time to answer a MBT or CBT. I marvel at how J ... at that level but I'll keep working tosee these things upfront ... bit. But yeah, even within games where there are "if" questions ... when it is appropriate to brute force (I've seen J.Y do ...
... registered for the Dec. I've been studying for almost 2 ... As in, I (attempt to) fool-proof whatever game I've just learned ... wanted to know howI did. Then I foolproofed the Saturday's games. Sunday, I ... sections) so I'm anxiously waiting tosee if I beat my old ...
... your webinar; in fact, I've returned to parts of it several ... doing timed section repeats for gamesI've already Foolproofed
> < ... Add 6 to a 170 and you'll seehow big a deal ... different objectives. Ideally, I'd like tosee your BR consistently +175 ...
... 168 is the highest I’ve ever heard of haha. ... really hard for me tosee many people doing ... sees the inferences, and how everything works together. But ...
> We have to wonder how their minds got like that ... LSAT logic games section just tosee what I was doing ...
... "’s 168 is the highest I’ve ever heard of haha. < ... took a LSAT logic games section just tosee what I was doing all ... on gamesI followed a pretty normal path. I was unable to finish ... to the clarity of howto improve. So I was pretty lucky.
... "’s 168 is the highest I’ve ever heard of haha. games section just tosee what I was doing all ... on gamesI followed a pretty normal path. I was unable to finish the ... behind in due to the clarity of howto improve. So I was pretty ...
... s 168 is the highest I’ve ever heard of haha. ... really hard for me tosee many people doing much ... a LSAT logic games section just tosee what I was doing ... gamesI followed a pretty normal path. I was unable to ... in due to the clarity of howto improve. So I was ...