HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| if | 76.1K | 134.5K |
| a | 136.3K | 436.2K |
| then | 29.5K | 42.2K |
| b | 10.1K | 23.1K |
-
Negation of "A and B"I really don’t understand where this rule ” For conditionals, A and B negates to A → /B ” came from or how it would be applicable to the actual exam.…
... rule ” For conditionals, A and B negates to A → /B ” came from or how ... ’re positing that /B is a necessary condition of A and thus can ... as being A and B → C negated to /C → /A or /B as specified ... be either A and B -> C or C -> A and B included ... -
Difference b/t sufficient and necessary assumption questions (formal logic)It really helps me understand the concepts of assumption questions by looking at it formally. Could someone check my logic? So say we have a premi…
... you could say "Well, A-->B isn't really necessary. ... It's possible that 'A-->B'" I don't think ... gave
{A (and) (A->B) (and) (B->C) (and) ... C} -> (A->C)
A ... is conditional, i.e., if A then C. So we don't ... -
Cheat Sheet - LR question typesFor LR reasoning is there a cheat sheet out there that summarizes all the strategies by question type?
... /> 2) Causation implies chronology: If A--> Then A must have come first
A) and Fire (B) (correlated)
** Just because A and B are correlated ... . A caused B
2. B caused A
3. C caused both A and B ... -
PT65.S4.Q23 - dogs are the descendants of domesticated wolveshttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-65-section-4-question-23/ This question has had me stumped for like 3 days! I have done everything I can t…
... terms, this is a mistaken reversal.
B) is almost exactly ... of issue to discuss with B.
Firstly, you ... key: (B) goes beyond this claim to state that if a dog is ... D says. basically, D says "if A, then A." Well, duh. D literally says ... -
Causation - CorrelationHey guys! I've been meaning to ask if anyone could help me better understand this concept. I think I understand it but when I'm under timed condit…
... that indicates a causal relationship (because x, then y; since a, then b; c requires ... then write that out next to the stimulus.
2) If ... you don't see a causal relationship, map ... move to the answer choices if you can prove to ... -
contrapositive questionDoes neither nor go to either or? For example, if A then neither B nor C. Is the contrapositive if B or C then A slash?
if A then neither B nor C means A -> /B AND A->/C so if B or C (either of the two) are present, then A can't be - so you're right. I may be wrong... but that is my understanding of it. I think there is a lesson in advanced logic on this. -
embedded conditionalsOk question on this. Lets say we have "if A then no B unless C". According to JY we can diagram as follows: A-->(B-->C) we pull the first term in…
"if A then no B unless C"
From ... B---> would become B
If A->B->C
If A and B ... would then be
Not C-> Not B->not A ... think you can diagram as A--> (~C--> ... -
Difference between negation and contrapositive?I've been through the 'Some and Most Relationships' module once....and twice...but am still unclear on the exact difference between a contrapositive …
... it in this format: -A then -B (if not apple then not fruit)
A then -B (not all apples are fruits ... -
Conditional StatementsHello! I really want to improve on my conditionality. Especially when it comes to looking at the stimulus and, although it's not worded in tradition…
... if then" statements or drawing the "if then" statements out like (A --> B ... we say "unless" a, then b, we're really ... b to happen. OH! I see. If a is the necessary condition, then ... the conditional statement is really just b ... -
Does "A causes B" equal to A -->B?Hi, guys, I am confused with the relationship between "causation" and conditional logic. Could anyone give me some help? According to the lessons, it…
If A causes B, A always lead B. If you don't see B, then you don't see ... A ... . Situations such as A causes B in ... . Thus, if you don't see B you can never see A.
Assumption of "/A -> /B " in the causal relationshipShould it be true that the assumption of "/A -> /B " in the causal relationship is A -> B
... only cause for B and thereby assume that if A does not happen ... , B does not happen. ... using the same logic, if /A causes /B, wouldn't we also ... that if /A does not happen, then /B does not happen, which is "A ->B"PT62.S2.Q6 - although some nutritional factsI did not understand how and why he figured out which parts of the sentences he could use to make conditional statements from the video. He did not u…
... to do then people will do it. And if people do ... all connected. Ac(A) if caffeine content listed then some people will ... which is if A then D). …. That is to say A triggers B which ... triggers C which triggers D. So if you declare A then ...Logic Games Attack StrategySo I've got three weeks left in the Army before I start terminal leave and I've finally reached the end of the learning curriculum and the only thing…
... never seen before, even if you did every single game ... 2 easy games in a section with a weird one) and ... " the difficult game even if you don't come up ... "how do I represent "if A or B are in C is out ... to intuitively know that if A is before B then A can't be last ...Demorgan Law: HelpJust some Confusion on statement with both "and" and "or" in the stimulus. For example how would I draw a conditional statement with a stimulus like …
... .
For "if A or B than C and D" ... the sufficient: either A or B happening triggers C and ... If not C OR not D then not A AND not B ( ... /> /C-->/A+/B
/D-->/A+/B
Split ... the necessary:
/C-->/A
/C-->/B ...LSAT LR Lingo:)Hey guys! I hope your study is going well... I just have a few questions you may be able to help with:) I have been a bit confused on the exact d…
... "Either/Or" relationship. If not A -> then B, If not B -> then A.
There may ...PT16.S2.Q16 - researchers in south austrailiaHi fellow 7Sagers, while commenting on the September Discussion, I would be thankful if someone can explain to me why answer choice C is wrong and E …
... in A and B.
It assuming that because A and B ... A and B. If A and B had something essentially different like B had better technology, then ... is measured by CPU, then D is same for both ... br />
Let me know if I sucked at explaining it.RC: Infer questionHi, I found I miss points especially on this question. Sometimes we have to find info from sentences located in different place in passages...and…
... 's a reading comp thing. You read it, and then you ... makes the difference between a premise and a conclusion.
... context and they want simple "if A, then do B" instructions. Obviously, I ... can tell you a process if you need a process. Just throwing ...As related to the LSAT, what is modality?Hello all, I've seen the word modality thrown around a lot in discussions. As related to the LSAT, and in everyday English, what is modality? Exam…
... substitutive identity. Logically, if a and b refer to the same ... if Jesse James is Mr. Howard, and someone shot Mr. Howard, then ... />
I just saw a problem involving propositional attitudes (knowledge ... to recommendations, like "A and B, so X should C ...Flaw confusion, please help!!!Hi guys, I have some confusion going on here between the difference of the following question: https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-25-se…
... />
If A cause B cause C, then it concludes C causes A; this is ... A, or C and A, is ignored.
If most A cause B, then B, therefore A,then ... , some B is not A ...Summary of Argument FormsIs there a summary PDF of the valid and invalid argument forms? Thank You!
... axioms like "if A and B, then B," there can't be a finite list.
There is sort of a solution, though. If you limit the number ... each premise, you can get a long but finite list. In ... them out every now and then.
https://en.m ...Contrapositive of embedded conditionals?The user and all related content has been deleted.
... /> (A --> B) --> C
This means that if A and B exist ... in this conditional relationship with each other, then ... . This means that if we deny C, A and B do not exist ...Contrapositive of embedded conditionals?The user and all related content has been deleted.
... ; (A --> B) --> C
>
> This means that if A ... and B exist in this conditional relationship with each other, then ... C. We're actually free to play with the A --> B ... . This means that if we deny C, A and B do not exist ...What does "or else" mean in sequencing games?Hey guys, Had a 7Sager email me with a question that I thought you guys could help out with. Here it is: ------------------------------------- …
It's just an inclusive or. If not A, then B = If not B, then A. At minimum one must be present.advanced formal logic some and most inferenceHi guys, I am confused with a logic inference. According to a book, if A, then not B, can be notated like A-->/B or A<-|->B. However, in 7sage, i…
... to a book, if A, then not B, can be notated like A-->/B or AB ... , it is maybe notated like A/B.
>
> Here ... very beginning of the post,A-->/B AND AB are actually ... (the replaced first )
> then the inference are,
> ...advanced formal logic some and most inferenceHi guys, I am confused with a logic inference. According to a book, if A, then not B, can be notated like A-->/B or A<-|->B. However, in 7sage, i…
my question is whether EF, E/F, and E--->/F are the same thing?
in other words, should the" if A, then not B" be biconditional notated?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... thing. If A, then not B is represented as A----->/B ( B----->/A) and A or B, but ... not both is /A----->B ( /B----->A ...advanced formal logic some and most inferenceHi guys, I am confused with a logic inference. According to a book, if A, then not B, can be notated like A-->/B or A<-|->B. However, in 7sage, i…
... not a Bi-conditional. If A then not B is a not both rule: A ---> B, for ... it's not clear if ... 's required for A to even show up. "If...then..." is a conditional itself ...is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... /> If B is chosen, A cannot be
If we don't choose (/A) then, B must ... be chosen
If we don't choose (/B) then A must ... if A not B (A->/B CP: B->/A)
If A is chosen B cannot be
Lsatbreakingnews May 2017 Logical Reasoning
is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... ; If B is chosen, A cannot be
> If we don't choose (/A) then, B ... must be chosen
> If we don't choose (/B) then A must ... in if A not B (A->/B CP: B->/A)
> If A is chosen B cannot ...is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... of an inclusive or. The "A or B, but both both" is ... diagrammed as the following: A --> /B (B--> /A).
I'm ... referencing the "A or B, **not ... ". I'm saying "If A, then not B" and "A or B, but not both" as ...