HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| if | 76.1K | 134.6K |
| a | 136.3K | 436.2K |
| then | 29.5K | 42.2K |
| b | 10.1K | 23.1K |
| unless | 3.8K | 4.2K |
| c | 6.8K | 11.6K |
-
PT21.S2 Q12 - Government subsidiaries have been proposed...Hi, I have a question about how Lawgic is drawn out for LSAT 21 Section 2 Question 12 December 1996 test. The line in the logical reasoning stimu…
... statement is just that, a condition statement that is contained ... br />
If erosion then /controlled
Unless implemented, if erosion, then not controlled ... erosion...
Unless implemented not controlled.
/I → /C -
PT21.S2 Q12 - Government subsidiaries have been proposed...Hi, I have a question about how Lawgic is drawn out for LSAT 21 Section 2 Question 12 December 1996 test. The line in the logical reasoning stimu…
... If erosion then /controlled
>
> Unless implemented, if erosion, then not ... >
> Unless implemented not controlled.
> ... ;
> /I → /C
>
> < ... graduate program with a minimum help received ... -
PT21.S2 Q12 - Government subsidiaries have been proposed...Hi, I have a question about how Lawgic is drawn out for LSAT 21 Section 2 Question 12 December 1996 test. The line in the logical reasoning stimu…
... If erosion then /controlled
> >
> > Unless implemented, if erosion, then ...
> > Unless implemented not controlled.
> ... br /> > > /I → /C
> >
... graduate program with a minimum help received ... -
Are these lawgic translations correct?#1 A cannot B without C. Translation: AB --> C /C --> /AB #2 A without B cannot C. Translation: /AB --> /C C --> AB I'm curiou…
... translation.
If we apply my translation rule:
A = an air ... />
"A **cannot** B **without** C"
Rule: AB --> C
If (AB) an ... air traveler in Bejing flies To Lhasu, then (C ... -
PT58.S1.Q11 & PT62.S4.Q19: Come on, where's the 7sage community! My post is getting ignored!I just couldn't anticipate the flaws with either of these questions and would like to know how people who got these correct went about doing them. My…
... that bulging disks is only a partial factor.
... of this kind of like a compound sufficient condition. (Conditional ... claims that if A and B then C. But a question has A and not C, so ... reference the possible existence of B (until you see “partly ... -
PT58.S1.Q11 & PT62.S4.Q19: Come on, where's the 7sage community! My post is getting ignored!I just couldn't anticipate the flaws with either of these questions and would like to know how people who got these correct went about doing them. My…
... of this kind of like a compound sufficient condition. (Conditional ... claims that if A and B then C. But a question has A and not C, so ... reference the possible existence of B (until you see “partly ... Cause: X (Bulging disks+ factor A), Effect: Y (Pain)
< ... -
PT16.S2.Q16 - Researchers in South AustraliaBased on my understanding of the stimulus, the flaw is that the author is assuming that what was true in the past (CPUE is constant= X number of sha…
... />
If the measurement does NOT change -> then factor X ... true:
If A is true → then B or C is true.
a perfect weakener would be “C is true”? ... that B is true merely because A is true.
So if ... -
Need someone to explain why splitting 'or' sufficiency is okayIn the lesson about and/or sufficiency splits, JY says we split the 'or'. But in another lesson we learn that two sufficient conditions pointing to o…
If A or B, then C:
A or B-> C
Think about what ... we know if ... conditional statement (If A or B, then C) into two separate statements. A-> C ; B-> C
if a and b unless c or dDoes anyone know how to translate this? Thank you
... />
If A and B
A & B ->
Unless C or D ...
/C ... and /D ->
if- group ...In Out Games logic gameWhen one of the rules are: if A is selected then B and C are also selected so A--> B and C if you negate(Not select) JUST ONE of B or C n…
If A is selected, then B and C are also selected. This also means if B and C are not selected, then A can't be selected. Lastly however, you can have either B or C selected, without having A selected. Hope this helpsQuestion on chain inference.Hello, I know that iA —most→ B → C, then you cannot conclude most A are C. But if it becomes: A —most→ B → C→ D can you conclude that most A…
If A-most-B > C > D, then A-most-D is a **perfectly valid** conclusion to make, as is A-most-C.
Whoever said/voted otherwise needs to review this lesson: https://7sage.com/lesson/most-before-all-formal-argument-5/Formal LogicOkay guys, this is pretty much my dumb down version of explaining some formal logic based on my knowledge. I believe this is something that needs to …
...
*If A is out, then B is in
*If B is out, then A is in ...Games by 7Sagers: Dillon's DilemmaA Game A Day … keeps the, um, mental atrophy away? :-P I’m on the verge of completing my Sequencing Games training, and because I <s>have no lif…
... />
(A) Blah170blah
(B) DumbHollywoodActor
(C) Blah170blah and Fritz ... />
Let me know if I missed something and accidentally ... be so sweet if we could make A Game A Day ™, like ... , an actual thing. If anyone ...PT47 S1 Q24I don't understand why A can't be an answer and C is right. The stimulus said "Instruction is available-> consumers would find it much easier to p…
... , right?
So how can C be an answer?
I ... we find A-> NOT B (if the stimulus says A->B)?
So ... just like A->Not B (But C is "NOT A->B")
Can anyone explain why C ...skipping Q's; The elusive obvious on the first go.Ok here’s an odd question and probably not of much practical use, but I’m hoping some of you might be able to relate to this and shed some insight. …
... slowly once. There’s a sentence whose meaning you ...
You do a few other problems, and then come back to ... or E. But A or B or C- the answers you ... come away with a fresher perspective after a break? Is ... ? Maybe this is a question for a psychologist; I don’ ...how do you translate embedded conditionals when they are in the sufficient condition?Hi, I just reviewed the embedded conditional lecture by J.Y. I now understand why A -> (B->C) becomes A and B -> C I was wondering what happe…
... ; (B->C) becomes A and B -> C
I was wondering what happens if (A ... ->B ... ) -> C ...A cause BWhen there is a premise saying A cause B, For example. A. Premise(1): A Cause B Premise(2). There is B Conclusion: There is A Is this a valid …
... a premise saying A cause B, For example.
A.
Premise(1): A Cause B ...
Premise(2). There is B ...
Conclusion: There is A ... /> Premise(1): A Cause B
Premise(2 ...advanced formal logic some and most inferenceHi guys, I am confused with a logic inference. According to a book, if A, then not B, can be notated like A-->/B or A<-|->B. However, in 7sage, i…
... a book, if A, then not B, can be notated like A-->/B ... it is maybe notated like A/B.
Here ... of the post,A-->/B AND AB are ... the replaced first )
then the inference are,
... />
However, if we replace the original part ...Hardest & Most Difficult LSAT Sections ever listedHey guys, I know we only finished with the test a week ago, and even some are finishing up in Florida today (Congrats btw!). And I haven't even reall…
... much thought to a re-take, but if I do it ...
5 Star- PT A, PT B, PT C, PT 18, PT 27 ... aren't that hard. If you really want to challenge ... PT's especially PT A, B, and C which are included in ... SuperPrep are difficult the entire way, if ..."no A are B" equals "all A are ~B"?Help! I thought "no A are B" equals "~B are A"
Help! I thought "no A are B" equals "~B are A"Invalid Argument Forms: "consecutive mosts"I wonder whether can we make an inference of A←s→C from A‑m→B‑m→C? (_reference: PT62 section 2 Q19_) For sure, it would be an invalid argument if …
... an inference of A←s→C from A‑m→B‑m→C? (_reference: PT62 section ... an invalid argument if an inference of A‑m→C is made.
If a person has bipolar disorder is it worth seeking accommodations for test day?If a person was diagnosed with bipolar disorder several years after taking any standardized exam is it worth seeking accommodations for the LSAT?
If a person was diagnosed with bipolar disorder several years after taking any standardized exam is it worth seeking accommodations for the LSAT?My BR template for LRHi, over the past year or so I've constantly been updating my blind review template based on what instruction from tutors and mentors, from the 7Sage…
... most when I BR a question.
If you have any ... />
A.
TWR.
B.
TWR.
C.
TWR.
Teach a parallel question:
Takeaways:PT 10 S1 Q20Is the reasoning flaw in the stimulus that it concludes what makes something not censorship from the sufficient condition for censorship? If A or B…
... sufficient condition for censorship?
If A or B, then Censorship exists.
From ... />
Similarly, in (D),
If A, then heroic.
From this, we ... condition. If it were the necessary condition, we have a way of ...Most relationship helpIs this correct? A most B most C A most C
There's no relationship between A and C.
You can combine most statements if:
A most B
A most C
-----------
Bs some CsDifference between negation and contrapositive?I've been through the 'Some and Most Relationships' module once....and twice...but am still unclear on the exact difference between a contrapositive …
... it in this format: -A then -B (if not apple then not fruit)
A then -B (not all apples are fruits ...Conditional StatementsHello! I really want to improve on my conditionality. Especially when it comes to looking at the stimulus and, although it's not worded in tradition…
... everything into "If...then" format really helps. So if a question said: "Unless it's ... would rephrase as: "If it's not snowing, then I'll ride ...LR Study Guides ThreadI was wondering if we could upload our study guides in this post for those taking the June and upcoming LSATs can always come back to this.
... ’m not a tragedy… I could still be sad. What if I ... /> A -most-> B some C
_________
A some C
A some B ... -most-> C
_________
A some C ...Does "A causes B" equal to A -->B?Hi, guys, I am confused with the relationship between "causation" and conditional logic. Could anyone give me some help? According to the lessons, it…
If A causes B, A always lead B. If you don't see B, then you don't see ... A ... . Situations such as A causes B in ... . Thus, if you don't see B you can never see A.
Assumption of "/A -> /B " in the causal relationshipShould it be true that the assumption of "/A -> /B " in the causal relationship is A -> B
... only cause for B and thereby assume that if A does not happen ... , B does not happen. ... using the same logic, if /A causes /B, wouldn't we also ... that if /A does not happen, then /B does not happen, which is "A ->B"
