HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| lr | 21.4K | 37.6K |
| 25 | 2.9K | 3.8K |
-
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
haha when you had 3 LR and you remember all of the above mentioned LR ?s... ugh..
I had LR(25) LG LR(26) (Break) LR(26) RC. -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... number/percentages. I had LR (25) questions, LG, LR (25), LR (26) and then RC ... if my first or second LR were real (my first also ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... number/percentages. I had LR (25) questions, LG, LR (25), LR (26) and then RC ... if my first or second LR were real (my first also ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... number/percentages. I had LR (25) questions, LG, LR (25), LR (26) and then RC ... if my first or second LR were real (my first also ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... from people who had:
LR(25)-LG-LR(25)-LR(26)-RC
I had:
LR(25)-LG-LR(26)-LR(26)-RC
LR (each with 26 questions) is ... will have two 26 question LR sections back to back and ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
Has anyone come to any conclusions on if the 1st or 3rd section was experimental on the LR(25)-LG-LR(25)-LR(26)-RC test format? Would appreciate any input even if you are not certain -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... section was experimental on the LR(25)-LG-LR(25)-LR(26)-RC test format ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... section was experimental on the LR(25)-LG-LR(25)-LR(26)-RC test format ... have been in the 2nd LR section, and the 3rd over ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... section was experimental on the LR(25)-LG-LR(25)-LR(26)-RC test format ... have been in the 2nd LR section, and the 3rd over ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... section was experimental on the LR(25)-LG-LR(25)-LR(26)-RC test format ... have been in the 2nd LR section, and the 3rd over ... conclude that I had LR-LG-LR(exp)-LR-RC. This stinks because ... 1 question in the first LR because it was hard as ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... section was experimental on the LR(25)-LG-LR(25)-LR(26)-RC test format ... have been in the 2nd LR section, and the 3rd over ... conclude that I had LR-LG-LR(exp)-LR-RC. This sticks because ... 1 question in the first LR because it was hard as ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... was experimental on the LR(25)-LG-LR(25)-LR(26)-RC test format ... been in the 2nd LR section, and the 3rd ... conclude that I had LR-LG-LR(exp)-LR-RC. This sticks ... question in the first LR because it was hard ... />
Same...between that LR section and the RC I ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... was experimental on the LR(25)-LG-LR(25)-LR(26)-RC test format ... been in the 2nd LR section, and the 3rd ... conclude that I had LR-LG-LR(exp)-LR-RC. This sticks ... br /> > Same...between that LR section and the RC I ... mistake or two per LR section and mistake per ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... was experimental on the LR(25)-LG-LR(25)-LR(26)-RC test ... that I had LR-LG-LR(exp)-LR-RC. This sticks ... gt; > Same...between that LR section and the RC I ... about. Unfortunately for me LR and RC are wildcards. ... life?
LR is always like -5 and ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... was experimental on the LR(25)-LG-LR(25)-LR(26)-RC test format ... that I had LR-LG-LR(exp)-LR-RC. This sticks ... ; > Same...between that LR section and the RC I ... about. Unfortunately for me LR and RC are wildcards. ... /> >
> LR is always like -5 and ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... was experimental on the LR(25)-LG-LR(25)-LR(26)-RC test ... that I had LR-LG-LR(exp)-LR-RC. This sticks ... ; > Same...between that LR section and the RC I ... about. Unfortunately for me LR and RC are wildcards. ... gt; >
> > LR is always like -5 and ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... was experimental on the LR(25)-LG-LR(25)-LR(26)-RC test format ... that I had LR-LG-LR(exp)-LR-RC. This sticks ... ; > Same...between that LR section and the RC I ... mistake or two per LR section and mistake per ... about. Unfortunately for me LR and RC are wildcards. ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... was experimental on the LR(25)-LG-LR(25)-LR(26)-RC test format ... that I had LR-LG-LR(exp)-LR-RC. This sticks ... ; > Same...between that LR section and the RC I ... mistake or two per LR section and mistake per ... about. Unfortunately for me LR and RC are wildcards. ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... was experimental on the LR(25)-LG-LR(25)-LR(26)-RC test format ... that I had LR-LG-LR(exp)-LR-RC. This sticks ... ; > Same...between that LR section and the RC I ... mistake or two per LR section and mistake per ... about. Unfortunately for me LR and RC are wildcards. ... -
Official December LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official December LSAT Discussion Thread. <b>Please keep all discussions of the December 2017 LSAT here!</b> Here's some grou…
Tried Reddit, but maybe I'll have better luck here
LR(25)-RC-LR(26)-LR(26)-LG
Which LR was experimental? (Please tell me the second.) -
Official December LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official December LSAT Discussion Thread. <b>Please keep all discussions of the December 2017 LSAT here!</b> Here's some grou…
...
>
> LR(25)-RC-LR(26)-LR(26)-LG
> ... ;
> Which LR was experimental? (Please tell me ... -
Official December LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official December LSAT Discussion Thread. <b>Please keep all discussions of the December 2017 LSAT here!</b> Here's some grou…
... />
I had experimental LR. LR(25)-RC-LR(26)-LR(26)-LG, think I ... had this in the second LR... any confirmation? Also in the ... -
Official December LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official December LSAT Discussion Thread. <b>Please keep all discussions of the December 2017 LSAT here!</b> Here's some grou…
... /> > I had experimental LR. LR(25)-RC-LR(26)-LR(26)-LG, think I ... had this in the second LR... any confirmation? Also in the ... ! I'm guessing the 2nd LR (section 3 of the entire ... -
Official December LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official December LSAT Discussion Thread. <b>Please keep all discussions of the December 2017 LSAT here!</b> Here's some grou…
... following:
1 - LR (25) - 1st question was mayor candidate ... kinda tough
3. LR - I think this had ... /> 4. LR - Can't remember if it was 25 or 26 ... , but found this LR section to ... T-Rex question? What LR section for this test ... -
Official December LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official December LSAT Discussion Thread. <b>Please keep all discussions of the December 2017 LSAT here!</b> Here's some grou…
... /> > I had experimental LR. LR(25)-RC-LR(26)-LR(26)-LG, think I ... had this in the second LR... any confirmation? Also in the ... -
Official December LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official December LSAT Discussion Thread. <b>Please keep all discussions of the December 2017 LSAT here!</b> Here's some grou…
Had LR(25),RC,LR(26),LR(26), LG. I know the first LR was real, has anyone that had the same template as mine figured if the 3rd or 4th LR was real? -
Official December LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official December LSAT Discussion Thread. <b>Please keep all discussions of the December 2017 LSAT here!</b> Here's some grou…
LR-RC-LR-LR-LG
I unfortunately found the first LR (25 questions, the ... the massacre of the first LR :tired_face:
Good luck everyone ... -
Official December LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official December LSAT Discussion Thread. <b>Please keep all discussions of the December 2017 LSAT here!</b> Here's some grou…
... my test was LR (25), RC, LR (25), LR (26), LG. ... The question topics that I remember from the LR ... LR 25: prodevelopment was the first question
Second LR 25: ... />
Third LR 26: science with physical phenomena ... -
Official December LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official December LSAT Discussion Thread. <b>Please keep all discussions of the December 2017 LSAT here!</b> Here's some grou…
... order of my test was LR (25), RC, LR (25), LR (26), LG. The question ... :
>
> First LR 25: prodevelopment was the first question ...
>
> Second LR 25: a question about commitment should ... -
Official December LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official December LSAT Discussion Thread. <b>Please keep all discussions of the December 2017 LSAT here!</b> Here's some grou…
My sections were LR (25), RC, LR (25), LR (26) and LG. Trying to figure out my experimental LR, did anyone have the question like if it rains in H Valley then it usually snows in N valley, if it snows there it rains somewhere else
