In regards to PT31 Game 2 question 8, if the rule states /A and/B —-> C, then the contrapositive would be /C —-> AorB. My question is, can both A and B be in (I.e. at least one is in) or is it just either AorB, not both. Thank you!
... or SOME statement (A->B some C, therefore A some CORA->B most C, therefore A most C ... : A some B some C, therefore A some C (transitive property does NOT apply to ... does NOT apply to MOST statements) A some B, …
... largely on the game whether ornot you have to resort to ... spots where stuff like either AorB must go in this slot ... />
If a question asks you to put C in group 3 ... all the time something triggers or is an "eye-opener".
... -> causation (A corr B, therefore A cause B). So in order ... B cause A (flip)
3. C cause AorB (3rd cause)
4. A corr B ... explain the phenomenon FULLY, not partially. Treat these like ... the premise but are actually not really doing so. These ...
... enough in conditional logic to not have to write down any ... simple conditionals (e.g. A -> B). You can get away with ... complex conditionals (e.g. AorB -> C) if you struggle with those ... with writing the odd contrapositive or two to make sure you ...
... characterized as having either a parallel construction ora serial construction. I’m ... Some/Most is before Implies (or the existential are before the ... are notA’s and it’s those non-A-B’s that are C ...
Many can equal most, but not necessarily. The important thing about ... the flaw is a correlation-causation fallacy (or false cause, whatever ... (i.e. A most B most C, ergo A most C), then the difference ... opinion givers, so it is not as important.
... passes through area A and B but notC. According to the stim we ... it. Now lets say ac(A) happens and pollen from area ... C blew on in while the relic was in area AorB ... the relic passed through area C...But it didn't, so ...
... an if (A+B) then C, contrapositive if notC then notAornotB. I edited ... use.
It's nota nice question, for sure, especially ... for a 4th question. To me ... negated. B links the "personalities taking over" to not being unobtrusive ...
... 2 easy games in a section with a weird one) and ... up for a while.
The Fool Proof is not about ... do I represent "if AorB are in C is out?" anymore, and ... know that if A is before B then A can't be ... to play the violin or watching a master playing it can ...
... , but it's not easy without a lot of practice. a A-->B (not both rule) you know that ... is going to include either AorB, so at least one of ... />
If they also throw in aC-->D rule (at least ... the "in" group with aC/D slot. So you know ...
... statement: AorB --> C and D Note: The A and B can split ... I would not split them. You've already split the "AorB" statement ... />
(not) COR (not) D ---> (not) A AND (not) B
The same rule applies for splitting. Cor ...
... one odd rule that is not strictly a numbers rule. For those ... of each option is 3 (AorB, Cor D and E). So S ... faster to copy, and a chart is not typically necessary (you just ... abstract way and I'm not the most organized person. I ...
... the disjuncts or conjuncts of a disjunction or conjunction or whatever must also ... park, then Chris does not go to the park". ... true or false. This is why the symbolization "A --> ~C" ... for "AorB" and "A and B" and "AB" as well, where "A" and "B" ...
It does not ...
A = giraffes B = gasoline C = Abraham Lincoln< ... LSAT, we are not concerned with soundness, only ... ridiculous, counterintuitive, or wrong a given premise may seem ...
... the test writers do a good job of hiding ... readily you'll see A) How they were hidden ... and B) What exactly the flaw ... the test writers do a pretty good job at hiding ... (e.g. is it A -> C? Or perhaps, [not] C -> [not] A? or something else?).
... is incorrect. The negation does not carry over to vow, as ... have: If ~CFB OR VSI --> One should not criticize that form ... />
(1) ~ aorb --> c
(2) ~a
(3) b
(4) ~a & b (conjoining ...
... cannot run, cannot swim or cannot fly are easy to ...
Hey, so I could not find the lesson you were ... , that's not an "and" its an "or". So based ... , we actually have an "or" in the sufficient. Because ... But had we written A-->BA-->C-->D. Negating D ...