no, A-> B doesn't imply "B some not A", but it may. In ... that A->Band, simultaneously, that B->A, which means that "B some not A ... that B is a circle in which A is just a subset of B, which ... would mean that There are some B ...
... if a point was made regarding ignoring contrapositives...and your ... />
Example A--->B means that if I have ... br />
A--->Band the reality is that i have aB, that ... to have aB, again, the rule becomes irrelevant and can be ...
... the process of taking a contrapositive ("flip and negate"). Just remember the ... ". You can use A -> Band /B -> /A interchangeably and nothing will go wrong ... " in a different way - I'm denying the statement entirely. And if ...
... balancing is a tough job... I did it and my doctoral work ... ... got my worst grades ( aB+ and 2 A -s not good at the ... certainly has the patience and good intentions of a doctoral student... how ... up giving because of a family tragedy and then the December test ...
... relationship is that a->band not b-> not a are logically equivalent ... a theft that is a crime, there must be a law making that a ... crimes. Maybe there is just a single law?
Yup, it is correct. And @amipp170 is right also! Whenever you have A--->BandB-->A (which is what you have here if you take the contrapositive of the second statement), you can make the statements into one biconditional AB.
... just followed the question stem and looked for the answer that ... it narrowed down to A & Band chose A because it's description ... seemed to align a little better ...
... if (A+B) then C, contrapositive if not C then not A or not B. I ... use.
It's not a nice question, for sure, especially ... for a 4th question. To me it ... that must have been negated. B links the "personalities taking over ...
... on 77.4.20). And I think the lessons ... you linked on quantifiers and their negations are good.< ... LSAT courses, i.e. "A→B", and I think this representation leads ... to a lot of confusion. ... be happy to start a new thread or PM ...
... , I should read a "A->/B" rule and write down "/A or /B," which is ... probably better expressed as "NOT (AANDB ... read "/A->B," and I write down "A/B." I read "A->/B," and I write ...
... a no slash, since A->/BandA/B both mean that if there is A, B ... of A/B, if B is not there, A should be there, and if A is ... not there, B ... it's ok for both AandB are out, I guess.
... out like this A -> /BandB->/A,
If you just ... sentence written as:
/A---->Band /B--->A
This means if ... link up easily and can be written as: A/BandB/A
... to a book, if A, then not B, can be notated like A-->/B ... , it is maybe notated like A/B.
>
> Here ... very beginning of the post,A-->/BAND AB are actually the ... lease a some intersection between G and E. (G /E) and if ...
... universal quantifiers and doing so would create a logically equivalent ... of ab becomes /b -> /aAND /a -> /b, and not /b -> /a OR /a -> /b?????? Isn ... 't the contrapositive of AND ...