I posted this under the Q-specific help vid, but the discussion forum here seems to get more attention sometimes, so double-posting. Promise to add helpful responses I get to my original discussion for our future LSAT progeny :3< ...
How would you diagram the highlighted sentence. It has three conditional indicators ("if"- group 1 sufficient, "unless"- group 3 negate/sufficient and "cannot" group 4- negate, necessary)?
The question itself is rather easy - (D) is pretty clearly something the argument is assuming, and necessarily so. Negating it makes a mockery of the argument.
However, I did spend quite a bit of time on this one, because I've always ...
Could someone explain why A is the answer? In the passage, the idea of "indifference toward offspring as a defense mechanism against establishing close ties with infants unlikely to survive" was mentioned in the first paragraph and not in relation to ...
So, I understand that the argument is saying that because incidences of the flu were lower during the 6 months of the public health campaign, that means that the campaign was effective.
I chose C - there were fewer large public gatherings ...
... . The Cambridge "Miscellaneous" packet from PT's 1-39 contains the ... - Game 4 PT 10 - Game 3 PT 11 - Game 4 ... PT 13 - Game 4 PT 15 - Game 2 PT16 - Game ... 4 PT 18 - Game 3
... it.
>
> PT B circle game
> ... 4
> PT Game 4
> PT 6 Game 3 ... br />
> PT 10 Game 3
> PT 11 Game 4 ... br />
> PT 15 Game 2
> PT16 Game 4
> PT 18 Game 3 ...