HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22K | 36.6K |
| 18 | 1.4K | 1.7K |
| section | 23.3K | 38.3K |
| 4 | 14.4K | 19.8K |
| q22 | 192 | 213 |
-
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... way.
>
> Section 1: RC. I totally bombed ... was the experimental.
> Section 2: LR. Hardest LR I ... : LG. Killed it
> Section 4: RC. Killed it
> ... was the experimental section and gave the other 4 my all (Praise ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... .
Was the LR section you found difficult 25 or ... on the 26 question LR (section 4 for me). I am fairly ... particular questions wrong on that section, and probably more.
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... way.
>
> Section 1: RC. I totally bombed ... was the experimental.
> Section 2: LR. Hardest LR I ... : LG. Killed it
> Section 4: RC. Killed it
> ... the difficulty of a particular section that someone like @"Cant Get ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... ;
> Was the LR section you found difficult 25 or ... on the 26 question LR (section 4 for me). I am fairly ... particular questions wrong on that section, and probably more.
> ... idea how many questions any section had, lol, so we'll ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... I'm pretty sure section 3 (2nd LR section) was my experimental ... /> > Did your first LR section have a question about school ... remember if your 3rd LR section (Section 4) have a lot of disagree ...With 2 real LSATs under my belt, and one still fresh, AMA if you are curious about real test vs. PTsHey all, I wanted to do this as a favor for people who have yet to take a real LSAT. Saturday was my 2nd real LSAT. I sat for the September 2016 and …
... me is the experimental section will play mind games ... practice with a fifth section but if you know ... experimental. When I started section 3 I was SUPER ... a single question. Then section 4 was LR again....and ... experimental and a hard section can have you praying ...'Best of J.Y. moments:' J.Y.'s video explanations that just make your day.I just came across [this explanation](https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-18-section-4-question-18/) and I realized how much J.Y.'s humor has ha…
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-62-section-4-question-05/
I just loled in the library @2:35Question about Chart vs. Grouping Game board set upHey all, So I realize J.Y's general rule for when to use a chart vs. when to use a standard grouping game board is that if the variables are only …
Wanted to bump this conversation, which I found specifically timely when analyzing PT 82 game 4.
Removed by admin. Do not talk specifics about PT82 until it is released to the public.Am I allowed to review CoreC during BR?As title. Am I allowed to use the Core Curriculum as I'm going through my BR?
... you have BR'd your PT/timed section, THEN you can and ...PT25.S4.Q01 - taxpayer: for the last ten yearsThe conclusion in the stimulus, I believe, starts from "However, as a result of its attempt..." Here, the taxpayer is saying that due to the fisca…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-25-section-4-question-01/
The ...PT30.S4.Q02 - the current theory about earthquakesIs the sentence that starts with "As plausible as this may sound, at least one thing remains mysterious...," the conclusion of this stimulus? So t…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-30-section-4-question-02/
Yeah ...Any lessons on Comparative Reading?I do not see any in the CC
Good point. But you can look at this: https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-june-2007-section-4-passage-2-passage/PT49--Mistake?Hi all, it's not a serious mistake but I noticed in S4 (the 2nd LR) that the first page says "22 questions" when really it's out of 25. Not sure if t…
Interesting - I just E-mailed @"Dillon A. Wright" today about a similar mistake. On PT32 Section 4 - questions 24 is missing completely. I wonder if this indicative of a bigger issue?PT 82 BR Sessions with J.Y. [Spoiler Warning]Hey 7Sagers, I'm leading BR calls for PT 82 (September 2017 LSAT). I'm holding 6 sessions total. 2 for each of LR 1, LR 2, and RC. Each session w…
LR section 4 question #14 good lord help me with this question ☹️. I got it to 50/50 B and E. What in the world....HALP!
How do they both not weaken? How are they not almost saying like the same thing?!How to get better at predictingThis is for assumption family questions (flaw, na, sa, psa) I see the conclusion. I see the support. But even for the easiest questions (as in one…
... />
For example, in PT 82 Section 1 #7 (even though it ...'Even without''even without' does not seem to follow our group 3 indicator rules.... Ella can pass even without giving her presentation Using Group 3 rules I…
... stuck on this while doing PT 37 section 2 qs 3.....such ...PT82.S4.Q13 - Computer voice recognition technologyHey all, I don't know if this is allowed, so moderators please step in if it isn't--I just wanted to see if anyone could provide an explanation (espe…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-82-section-4-question-13/
https://7sage ... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-55-section-3-question-24/Weakening questions - a strategy for harder questions?Yesterday I had the privilege of working through a problem with J.Y. It’s in here if you are curious; https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/1…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-82-section-4-question-14/the diaper postthrowaway account for 'obvious' reasons lol we've had these semi-joke, semi-serious posts before, but... this is it. in all seriousness, I'm go…
... and pee 6 times during section 4 and 5. :)Official December LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official December LSAT Discussion Thread. <b>Please keep all discussions of the December 2017 LSAT here!</b> Here's some grou…
... LR each, -0 LG, and -4 RC, but I am sure ... really sad when I opened section 4 and saw RC. I was ...Official December LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official December LSAT Discussion Thread. <b>Please keep all discussions of the December 2017 LSAT here!</b> Here's some grou…
... LR each, -0 LG, and -4 RC, but I am sure ... really sad when I opened section 4 and saw RC. I was ...Official December LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official December LSAT Discussion Thread. <b>Please keep all discussions of the December 2017 LSAT here!</b> Here's some grou…
... LR each, -0 LG, and -4 RC, but I am sure ... really sad when I opened section 4 and saw RC. I was ... design a really hard LG section without adding a fancy, unorthodox ...Official December LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official December LSAT Discussion Thread. <b>Please keep all discussions of the December 2017 LSAT here!</b> Here's some grou…
I had two LG (Sections 3 and 4). Thought section 4 was a little bit easier, more traditional. Both were tough in that I had a tough time making initial inferences. I just had to brute force try things. Thought the rest of the test was fair.PT19.S4.Q11 - five thousand of the 50,000 books publishedhttps://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-19-section-4-question-11/ (B) None of the films released in country Z in 1992 were based on books other t…
:warning: You cannot post an actual LSAT question. Please edit the original post. :warning:
7Sage forum rule: https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/15/forum-rules
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-19-section-4-question-11/PT19.S4.Q11 - five thousand of the 50,000 books publishedhttps://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-19-section-4-question-11/ (B) None of the films released in country Z in 1992 were based on books other t…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-19-section-4-question-11/
P ...Confusing Bi-Conditional vs. Not Both in LGHi all, I saw a 7sager already posted a similar question (see https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13716), but I'm less confused about what h…
> @BinghamtonDave said:
> Is the rule you referenced on a game about appetizers and main dish recipes? Is the N "Nutmeg?" I think this might hold one of the keys to understanding the subtlety here.
Yes! P24 Section 4 Game 1.Confusing Bi-Conditional vs. Not Both in LGHi all, I saw a 7sager already posted a similar question (see https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13716), but I'm less confused about what h…
... /> >
> Yes! P24 Section 4 Game 1.
The problem ...Confusing Bi-Conditional vs. Not Both in LGHi all, I saw a 7sager already posted a similar question (see https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13716), but I'm less confused about what h…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-24-section-4-game-1/) as an In ...Confusing Bi-Conditional vs. Not Both in LGHi all, I saw a 7sager already posted a similar question (see https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13716), but I'm less confused about what h…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-24-section-4-game-1/) as an In ...Confusing Bi-Conditional vs. Not Both in LGHi all, I saw a 7sager already posted a similar question (see https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13716), but I'm less confused about what h…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-24-section-4-game-1/) as an In ...
