HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22K | 36.6K |
| 21 | 1K | 1.2K |
| s3 | 910 | 1.3K |
| q | 2.2K | 3.2K |
| 22 | 985 | 1.2K |
-
Questions that feel like they require prior knowledgeI was doing some LR drills, and Q26 on PT 6 S3 felt like I just needed prior knowledge to answer the question successfully. I feel like this is what …
... drills, and Q26 on PT 6 S3 felt like I just needed ... -
PT 1.S3.Q21 - Necessary assumption questionIs anyone able to explain this question to me? I am horrible with proportions/math/etc, and I don't understand why my answer was wrong or why the rig…
Is anyone able to explain this question to me? I am horrible with proportions/math/etc, and I don't understand why my answer was wrong or why the right one is right. Thank you!!
#Help -
PT 86.S3.Q21 - FlawI watched JY's explanation video and I see why B is correct, but I'm still confused why D isn't either. It says "if ALL farmers..." in the premise, s…
I watched JY's explanation video and I see why B is correct, but I'm still confused why D isn't either. It says "if ALL farmers..." in the premise, so how isn't it overlooking that possibility? -
Identifying flawsI'm trying to identify flaws. is PT 56 S3 Q10 an equivocation flaw; can you use more than a word but a concept in this type of flaw? Is PT 52 S3 Q4 …
I'm trying to identify flaws. is PT 56 S3 Q10 an equivocation flaw; can you use more than a word but a concept in this type of flaw?
Is PT 52 S3 Q4 a false appeal flaw?
Is PT 54 S4 Q16 an implication flaw ?
thanks -
The secret to do tough Weaken/strengthen questionToday I have a big progress in weaken/strengthen question. I find in most weaken/strengthen question, there exists a presumption and the only thing…
... use the same examples, in PT 52 S3 Q19, the conclusion is ... -
Those Unique, Weird, Curve-breaker Logic Games :(What are y'all's strategies for attacking them? I finally got the basics down, and if I've seen an exact (or near exact version of the game) before, …
... . The Cambridge "Miscellaneous" packet from PT's 1-39 contains the ... - Game 4
PT 10 - Game 3
PT 11 - Game 4 ...
PT 18 - Game 4
PT 20 - Game 3
PT 21 - Game ... 2
PT 30 - Game ... -
Foolproof-ing is never-endingNow that I'm 23 tests into the LG Bundle, I have amassed over 300 games in my "To be foolproofed" file, having already completed over 100 games alrea…
... like I'll be practicing PT 21 right up until the day ... -
How long did it take for you to finish the LG Bundle?Hello, my fellow 7sagers! These days I have been working on my lg bundle and realized that it takes much more time than I expected! I initially thoug…
... .
Certainly!
Pt 1-20
http://www ... &creativeASIN=0615508502
Pt 21-40
http://www.amazon ... &creativeASIN=0615508510
Pt 41-60
http ... -
Sequencing games with a twist.For the people who are taking the 7sage course, and who are on the sequencing games with a twist section, did you attempt to diagram the games before…
... to set up. For example, PT 21 S1 G4, I am having ... -
Weird Games HighlightThere's been a lot of concern about weird game types appearing or potentially appearing in this era of LSAT. I think it's a healthy concern, and is p…
... on conditional lawgic
Pt 6 - S4 - Game 4 (Network ... a favourite.
Pt 4 - S3 - Game 4 (Ski chalets)
Pt 11-S1-Game 4 (Four ... requiring brute force.
Pt 16- S1- Game 4 (Tennis ... -
Inference MBTI hate these questions, they truly are the bane of my existence, and study. I am not sure what I am missing, but I am just not accurate with these qu…
... conditional logic, for example PT 33 S3 Q8 this question just seems ... -
PT26.S3.Q09 - scientific and technological discoveriesCan we please discuss why the answer is C instead of A? :o boggles my mind. I checked out the manhattan prep forum for their explanations but i didn'…
Appealing lsat questionHypothetically, if an appeal is won contesting a problematic question within a past afministration (which we all know is a rare occurence), are all s…
... released scores and the PT) that a Q was flawed. admitting it ...Access to PT explanationsIn the LSAT Ultimate course package, I noticed that full explanations for LSAT exams before PT 36 are provided when watching individual explanations …
Or you can directly access (assuming the explanation exists) with the url below. Just have to change the PT#, S#, and Q#.
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-69-section-1-question-14/What is your favorite LSAT Question and why?Mine is for sure PT69.S1.Q14 The test writers really outdid themselves with this one. For some reason this concept is just really interesting to m…
PT 9 S3 Game 3 - The School dance game. The sort of game that I would have lost my shit on had it been on the real deal, but taking the time to split the game boards and make all necessary inferences makes the questions a breezeWhich Preptests for Ultimate+ Problem Sets?Hey guys! I'm on the Main Point and Main Conclusion Problem Set 1, and the first question is from Preptest 21. But according to the pinned post h…
... Ultimate+ I only would need PT 36-77.
That ... for when you begin the PT phase of your studies! It ... see a drill question from PT 21. When you drill, you can ...Blind Review Group | PT 65 | Saturday, October 22 | 5 pm ESTNow officially Sage guided! https://media2.giphy.com/media/vjaeWeplneFYQ/200w.gif <h1>Saturday, October 22 at 5PM ET: PT 65</h1> Click here to joi…
@"Cant Get Right" said:
Now officially Sage guided!
When can we expect a seminar? ;)Studying for Dec LSATMessage me if you'd like to voice, FaceTime, or Skype to bounce information off each other. I tend to study better this way. Would be nice to also ta…
... ) and we are going over PT 65 https://7sage.com/discussion ... /9155/blind-review-group-pt-65-saturday-october-22-5-pm-est ...Logic Games -- SpeedSo this is my problem. If I give myself ten extra minutes for each LG section I do, I will get 100% right. Every time. But the issue is time. Often t…
... conditional linking, etc.). This was PT 21, Game 1.An attempt to analyse a question in a pure math/econ/finance way. PT 31-S2-Q8For those who have a math or econ or business background. We learned that of any financial or math model, there are 2 kinds of variables-Endogeno…
Questions that the method can be also applied to are: PT 33-S3-Q9, PT31-S3-Q10List of "weird games" to practice?Hi all, As JY has mentioned in many of his videos we should be expecting a "weird game" on the new LSATs, and if it doesn't appear, it's an added …
... it.
PT B circle game
PT 1 Game 1 ...
PT 2 Game 4
PT Game 4
PT 6 Game ...
PT 20 Game 3
PT 21 Game 2
PT 27 Game ... 2
PT 29 Game ...List of "weird games" to practice?Hi all, As JY has mentioned in many of his videos we should be expecting a "weird game" on the new LSATs, and if it doesn't appear, it's an added …
... it.
>
> PT B circle game
> ... 4
> PT Game 4
> PT 6 Game 3 ... br /> > PT 10 Game 3
> PT 11 Game 4 ... br /> > PT 20 Game 3
> PT 21 Game 2
> PT 27 Game 2 ...What Must be True, Could Be True, Cannot Be True - Conditional ReasoningHi! I have been working in the core curriculum for some time and there is something that I am not quite clear about conditional reasoning and its …
Reference point: PT 23 S3 Q14 (Sufficient Assumption Problem Set ...What Must be True, Could Be True, Cannot Be True - Conditional ReasoningHi! I have been working in the core curriculum for some time and there is something that I am not quite clear about conditional reasoning and its …
... :
> Reference point: PT 23 S3 Q14 (Sufficient Assumption Problem Set ...What Must be True, Could Be True, Cannot Be True - Conditional ReasoningHi! I have been working in the core curriculum for some time and there is something that I am not quite clear about conditional reasoning and its …
... /> > > Reference point: PT 23 S3 Q14 (Sufficient Assumption Problem Set ...So??So how does (E) provide us with a reconciliation?
What PT#, S# and Q#?Using words like "should"Is the use of a word like "should" prescriptive on the LSAT.? What i mean is: if a stimulus says that something will happen or could happen, will tha…
@goingfor99th PT 33 S3 Q18 AC, E. It could be wrong for other reasons. But in the LSAT TRAINER he says that saying what we ought to do is a different conclusioncould we ignore indicators in sentences with both group 3 and group 4 translations?In looking through the combination of conditional logic lessons on 7Sage and in The LSAT Trainer, I think I may have hit on a much more simple way to…
... because I was working on PT 23 S3 Q25. I had stumbled ...
