Is anyone able to explain this question to me? I am horrible with proportions/math/etc, and I don't understand why my answer was wrong or why the right one is right. Thank you!!
#Help
I watched JY's explanation video and I see why B is correct, but I'm still confused why D isn't either. It says "if ALL farmers..." in the premise, so how isn't it overlooking that possibility?
... , by accident, that PT26 S1 Game 2 and PT 81 S4 Game ... because I had randomly done PT26 S1 game 2 as a ... warmup LG before taking PT 81 today. They did ask ...
I'm trying to identify flaws. is PT 56 S3 Q10 an equivocation flaw; can you use more than a word but a concept in this type of flaw?
Is PT 52 S3 Q4 a false appeal flaw?
Is PT 54 S4 Q16 an implication flaw ?
thanks
Pretty sure it's not available any more. You can pick up pretty useful LG drill books pt 1-20, and 21-40 etc all repeated three times, on the Amazon website.
... miles/5 miles comparison. A PT is not 5 miles compared ... to 70. A PT is a whole long training ... need to up that to PT:26.2 miles as Weekly study ... is not always more where PT's are concerned. Taking more ... ve taken like 50-60 PT's including retakes and ...
@runiggyrun thanks for detail explanation I saw this happen in the PT26 game 4 with a sub-category that have one out spot only V,Z,Y and Z is always in and by splitting the game board based on V,Z,Y the game is solved completely.
PT 9 S3 Game 3 - The School dance game. The sort of game that I would have lost my shit on had it been on the real deal, but taking the time to split the game boards and make all necessary inferences makes the questions a breeze
@goingfor99th PT 33 S3 Q18 AC, E. It could be wrong for other reasons. But in the LSAT TRAINER he says that saying what we ought to do is a different conclusion