HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22K | 36.6K |
| 49 | 263 | 301 |
| s2 | 1.2K | 1.6K |
| q6 | 66 | 76 |
-
PT 72.S3.Q6 - Astrophysicist: Gamma ray bursts (GRBs)—explosionsit is a strengthening question where the conclusion is that descriptive labels have outlived their usefulness. Because an unusual Grb was sighted…
it is a strengthening question where the conclusion is that descriptive labels have outlived their usefulness.
Because an unusual Grb was sighted that had properties of both.
My issue with the correct ans choice is that the ... -
Wildly Inconsistent LR Scores after completing the Core Curriculum. Plz HelpSince completion of the CC, my LR scores have been ridiculously inconsistent. Here are the stats: PT 40 S1 -9 S3 -4 PT 41 S1 -4 S3 -3 PT 42 S2 -…
... are the stats:
PT 40 S1 -9 S3 -4 ... -3
PT 42 S2 -4 S4 -6
PT 43 S2 -8 S3 ... -2
PT 58 S1 -2 ... -
PT 72 S2 Q12 NA QuestionI am confused about the word “generally” in the conclusion. **To Recap The argument form in Lawgic:** **P1**: Emotional Tendencies /(Changed) **…
I am confused about the word “generally” in the conclusion.
**To Recap The argument form in Lawgic:**
**P1**: Emotional Tendencies /(Changed)
**Required Premise**: Emotional Tendencies /(Changed)-> Generally /(Able to choose ... -
PT 2 S2 Question 4 Can I infer some people are -P from the statement that most people are P?Can I infer some are -P from the statement that most people are P? I think saying most people are mortal does not mean some people are immortal, but …
Can I infer some are -P from the statement that most people are P? I think saying most people are mortal does not mean some people are immortal, but the correct AC of this question seems to suggest the otherwise. Is this a bad LR question? -
PT 18.S2.Q2Hey fellow 7Sagers, I'm having some trouble understanding this question. Here is how I diagrammed it: CR ----->/LW SRO---->LW (and th…
Hey fellow 7Sagers,
I'm having some trouble understanding this question.
Here is how I diagrammed it:
CR ----->/LW
SRO---->LW
(and then I diagrammed the last premise)
L CR
... -
HELP I can't understand this question no matter where I look.If someone could help me with this question and show why every AC is wrong and why the right one is right it would be very helpful. PT 2 S2 Questio…
... be very helpful.
PT 2 S2 Question 11
"If the ... -
Embedded conditional helpHi. I need help with something. I know how embedded conditionals work. For example A---> (B---->C) then it becomes A and B ----->C But what hap…
... ;B. Its a question from PT 74 S2 Q24. Its really tripping ... -
PT 21.S2.Q15 - Setting executives salariesI don't understand how executives from other companies setting salaries higher could have an impact on the salaries of executives from other companie…
I don't understand how executives from other companies setting salaries higher could have an impact on the salaries of executives from other companies?
**Admin Note:** https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-21-section-2-question-15/ -
PT M20.S2.G3For game three, do ya'll just brute force your way through? Or is there something I'm missing?
For game three, do ya'll just brute force your way through? Or is there something I'm missing? -
How to answer "substituted condition" question? explanation video?I need help with trying to answer the questions that ask something along the lines of "Which of following could substitute the condition (insert rule…
I need help with trying to answer the questions that ask something along the lines of "Which of following could substitute the condition (insert rule here)"? I don't know how to approach these at all.
Example: PT M20.S2.Q11 -
PT 89.S2.Q7 - Dire wolvesAfter reading this stimulus, I thought the author was assuming the dire wolves were trapped in the tar pits while hunting and scavenging. Is that cor…
After reading this stimulus, I thought the author was assuming the dire wolves were trapped in the tar pits while hunting and scavenging. Is that correct? I was confused about the use of language in answer choice D; what does most frequently actually mean? ... -
PT50.S2.Q6 - Classical Roman and postmodern architectureI understand the correct answer. However, it has not clicked why option A is wrong. Doesn't the argument presume that the components for the architec…
I understand the correct answer. However, it has not clicked why option A is wrong. Doesn't the argument presume that the components for the architectural style also have the same qualities. My reason is because, it conclusion is drawn form elements of ... -
Great Game to understand: Core inference LSAC expects you to knowHello, about a week ago I posed a discussion about my process on getting to -0(link below). Today I came across a game that is really good to know. P…
... is really good to know. PT 63 S2 G1. This is an ... -
PT 89.S2.Q24 - The increase in minimum wage in Country XHey y'all-- I posted this under the Q-specific help vid, but the discussion forum here seems to get more attention sometimes, so double-posting. P…
Hey y'all--
I posted this under the Q-specific help vid, but the discussion forum here seems to get more attention sometimes, so double-posting. Promise to add helpful responses I get to my original discussion for our future LSAT progeny :3< ... -
PT 57.S2.Q24 - Great poemsI have read the explanation on this question and am still having trouble. P1: Sometimes a reader believes that a poem is expressing contradictor…
I have read the explanation on this question and am still having trouble.
P1: Sometimes a reader believes that a poem is expressing contradictory ideas
P2: No one ever means to communicate contradictory ideas
Conc: ... -
PT18.S2.Q6 - A study was designed to establish which effect...Aren't there two main ways to weaken an argument? Either by going for the premises (contradicting them) or showing why the conclusion doesn't necessa…
Aren't there two main ways to weaken an argument? Either by going for the premises (contradicting them) or showing why the conclusion doesn't necessarily follow from them? I thought C did the first, but now I am having doubts. The stimulus concludes that ... -
Blind Review PT 50 S2Anyone willing to work together on a blind review for LR questions ?
Anyone willing to work together on a blind review for LR questions ? -
Hardest Logic Games?Hi all! Drilling logic games prior to the Nov flex test and would love to add a few more to my memorization rotation. Here are the ones I've rece…
... drilling:
PT 74, S2, G4
PT 75, S4, G4
PT 80, S3, G3
PT ... 80, S4, G4
PT 90, S3, G3 ...
PT 90, S3, G4 ... -
#help Explanation for PT C.S2.Q22Can someone explain why the answer is C and not A? Thanks in advance.
Can someone explain why the answer is C and not A? Thanks in advance. -
PT20.S2.Q6 (P1) - weakening questionHi, I can see why (B) is correct but I cannot figure out why (C) is wrong. Referring to Line 32 - 34, I thought jazz purists don't like jazz music …
Hi,
I can see why (B) is correct but I cannot figure out why (C) is wrong. Referring to Line 32 - 34, I thought jazz purists don't like jazz music be play with electic piano. Thus, (C) will also weaken author's characterization on the purists. ... -
LAWHUB vs 7Sage - why is it different?I was trying to make a problem set on here using questions I got wrong on various preptests in Lawhub, but when I went to add PT 62, S2, Q18 (which i…
... when I went to add PT 62, S2, Q18 (which in Lawhub ... -
2 extremely similar LR Main Conclusion questions with diff answersHey all was reviewing some MC conclusion questions and stumbled upon 2 structurally similar stimuli in exam PT 85 S2 10 and PT 73 S4 11. At a glance…
... similar stimuli in exam PT 85 S2 10 and PT 73 S4 11 ... -
PT6.S2.Q6 - High-technology medicine is driving up...I still don't get how the correct answer choice HAS to be true. how do we know that the costs of cataracts surgery today is decreasing?
I still don't get how the correct answer choice HAS to be true. how do we know that the costs of cataracts surgery today is decreasing? -
PT 81.S2.Q13- Why the answer is A and not C makes no senseSo, I understand that the argument is saying that because incidences of the flu were lower during the 6 months of the public health campaign, that me…
So, I understand that the argument is saying that because incidences of the flu were lower during the 6 months of the public health campaign, that means that the campaign was effective.
I chose C - there were fewer large public gatherings ... -
Different Wrong Answers after taking a drillSo I just made a custom drill of PT 130 S2 with all the RC passages in it and I'm currently reviewing my answers. I have attempted this section befor…
... made a custom drill of PT 130 S2 with all the RC ... -
LSAT Study Buddies!Hey study buddies, post your thoughts about your meetings here! Suggestions welcome! Here's the general idea guys. You're all studying for this h…
Does anyone want to blind review PT 49 with me (or any PT for that matter) sometime this week (preferably a weekday)? -
The Hardest LR Question of All Time - Preptest 29 Number 17 LR Studies of the reliability of eyewitnOk, I am joking about this being the hardest LR question of all time. Of course, there have been harder questions, but for some reason, this one took…
... function as sufficient assumptions (PT 54 S2 Q18 is a good example ... pretty much the same as PT 47 S1 Q20)
Negating a Conditional StatementHey guys, I can't remember where this was in the course, but what is the proper way to negate a conditional statment? So for example: ~ (X-->Y)…
If any one is curious the question that I'm looking at with regards to the above is PT 49, Section 2 Question 17
