HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22K | 36.6K |
| 53 | 243 | 300 |
| section | 23.3K | 38.3K |
| 1 | 27.1K | 40.9K |
-
Logic Games -- SpeedSo this is my problem. If I give myself ten extra minutes for each LG section I do, I will get 100% right. Every time. But the issue is time. Often t…
... conditional linking, etc.). This was PT 21, Game 1. -
About "without" It's about to negate the sufficient condition, right? any example will be appreciated.
PT 61, Section 4, Problem 25. And yes ... -
Warming up before a PT? IF so how much?I read in the past in some 180er's blog that he used to do a LG section before each PT to warm up. So I started doing that. 1 section of LG, usually …
... do the equivalent of about 1 section. 1 RC passage, 2 games, and ... - 15 questions in an LR section. That leaves me warmed up ... -
LG HelpI understand the 7sage method of improving on games (referring to the flowchart that is mentioned in the core curriculum) but I find that over the la…
... that it has taken me 1 calendar year: about 1200 games ... from scratch. Start with PT 2 Game 1. Do it three times ... it cannot go in spot 1. These are the reoccurring inference ... time.
Then do PT 1 Game 3. Focus on what ... -
PT52.S1.Q24 - in response to several bacterial infectionsI know answer choice B is not supported but I can't explain to myself WHY it's wrong. Is it wrong because the terms "apple" and "citrus" should be…
@lllllllll said:
Because McElligott's citrus juices HAVE NOT BEEN LINKED TO ANY BACTERIAL INFECTIONS, can't I assume that they contain less infectious bacteria than M'S apple juice?
No, you can never assume. All we know is that the ... -
PT19.S1.G3 - each of two boatsWith regards to the second rule, does anyone know why we can't simply place both F&G in out group? JY's explanation suggests placing G (Out) in one …
@ljazayeri said:
, does anyone know why we can't simply place both F&G in out group?
We can but that's only one possibility.
so our rule says when F out -->G out (in this case both F and G are out like you ... -
Causation Question StrategyWould somebody mind looking at the strategy below and letting me know if it makes sense/I've included everything? Thanks! On weakening questi…
This is an excellent list that I will be bookmarking. Thank you. PT 29 Section 4 Question 24 is illustrative. A very complex weakening question containing causation. -
Studying techniquesHello all! I was hoping I could get assistance with the order in which I should study for the LSAT! I am taking the exam in September but I thought i…
... very basic game like PT 2 Game 1? Can you get that ... -
Studying techniquesHello all! I was hoping I could get assistance with the order in which I should study for the LSAT! I am taking the exam in September but I thought i…
... very basic game like PT 2 Game 1? Can you get that ... -
How do I access all my starred question explanation pages?As I progress through the course, I watch the video explanations for my BR and star them for review. But I'm having trouble finding them all convenie…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-32-section-1-question-24/ is to go ... -
PT12.S4.Q22 - a long-term health studyHey All, So we have this health study that found that people who gained approximately 1 pound per year after the age of 35 tended, on the whole, t…
... of this, please refer to PT C2 Section 3 Question 15 (Deer ... -
Official February LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
I had LR for section 1,3,4 and I remember all those questions. I am relieved. My experimental was definitely section one -
Official February LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... /> > I had LR for section 1,3,4 and I remember ... relieved. My experimental was definitely section one
I got ... -
Official February LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... 134 too for LR but section 1 seemed so much more difficult ... -
Official February LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
> @xrssa89 said:
> I had LR for section 1,3,4 and I remember all those questions. I am relieved. My experimental was definitely section one
how do you know it's experimental one? -
Official February LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... /> > I had LR for section 1,3,4 and I remember ... relieved. My experimental was definitely section one
I also ... had LR for 1,3,4 but I remembered ... a question from 1 that someone who doesn't ... -
Official February LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... ; > I had LR for section 1,3,4 and I remember ... relieved. My experimental was definitely section one
>
> ... ; I also had LR for 1,3,4 but I remembered ... a question from 1 that someone who doesn't ... -
Official February LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... /> > I had LR for section 1,3,4 and I remember ... relieved. My experimental was definitely section one
This was ... -
June'17|Wed Feb 8 @7:00EST| BR with a Twist! PT62=SuperPrep II PT A - What's LSAC's Reasoning?To add a "**Twist**" this week, we have the added value of LSAC's Reasoning for every question on PT 62 in the SuperPrep II PT book - PrepTest A - Lo…
... will be covering PT 62 which is PT A in the second ... for 2 previously disclosed PT's and 1 undisclosed PT. While not necessary ... does provide a previously undisclosed PT that is estimated to be ... =ox_sc_act_title_1?ie=UTF8&psc=1&smid=ATVPDKIKX0DER -
June'17|Wed Feb 8 @7:00EST| BR with a Twist! PT62=SuperPrep II PT A - What's LSAC's Reasoning?To add a "**Twist**" this week, we have the added value of LSAC's Reasoning for every question on PT 62 in the SuperPrep II PT book - PrepTest A - Lo…
... be covering PT 62 which is PT A in ... 2 previously disclosed PT's and 1 undisclosed PT. While not ... provide a previously undisclosed PT that is estimated to ... ?ie=UTF8&psc=1&smid=ATVPDKIKX0DER
Okay, so sounds like PT 62 (December 2010) is the ... -
List of "weird games" to practice?Hi all, As JY has mentioned in many of his videos we should be expecting a "weird game" on the new LSATs, and if it doesn't appear, it's an added …
... .
PT B circle game
PT 1 Game 1
PT 2 Game ... 3
PT 2 Game ...
PT 29 Game 2
PT 30 Game 1
PT 31 Game ... 2
PT 33 Game ... -
List of "weird games" to practice?Hi all, As JY has mentioned in many of his videos we should be expecting a "weird game" on the new LSATs, and if it doesn't appear, it's an added …
... game
> PT 1 Game 1
> PT 2 Game 3
> PT 2 Game ... 4
> PT Game 4
> PT 6 Game 3 ... 2
> PT 30 Game 1
> PT 31 Game 2 ...
> PT 33 ... -
PT40.S3.Q14 - the only clue I haveGot this one right by POE but had a tough time being OK with A. It is definitely something I considered as a flaw in the reasoning. However, the use …
... these:
-PT C2 Section 3 Question 15
-PT 78 Section 3 Question ... -
The indicator "even if"Hi, I know that there are many words that indicate what groups (universal quantifiers) you are in. Among them, where does the word "even if" belong t…
... function.
For PT 46 Section 3 Question 24, are you ... -
Main Point of Argument vs. Main Point of Conclusion questions@"J.Y. Ping" or others that have an answer: How do you know, in LR questions where some Q stems require us to identify the main point of the "Argu…
... I am talking about on PT 34, sect 2 Q18
PT 29 Sec 1 Q 11) are these ... -
Beliefs v. FactsI've only come across this type of flaw a few times, but I'd like to understand the structure behind it. The explanation and example offered in the c…
Just came across an excellent example of this flaw on a really, really valuable question: PT 31 Section 2 question 21. -
"All that is required" Sufficiency or Necessity indicator?I understand that "ALL" is a sufficiency indicator word, and "REQUIRE" is a necessity indicator word. I'm wondering then, what does the phrase "*…
What Exactly is an Intensive?I see them mentioned on here a lot, but, aside from @"Cant Get Right"'s webinars, I rarely see them discussed or practiced much. Could someone explai…
... a necessary assumption. Consider: PT 39-Section 4 Question 19. While I ...Does anyone else think that the recent PT LR Qs punish prephrases?Ok, I might be exaggerating when I say "punish prephrases," but I noticed that the prephrases, especially for the flaw/ assumption type questions, do…
... I am not spoiling a PT for you, but for an ... example take a look at PT 58 Section 4 question 23.
I'm not understanding the difference between these two rules X <-> ~Y X -> ~Y Could someone please clear up for me? Thanks!
... to be SO easy PT 48 game 1, and I immediately did ...
