All Discussions
HitBox
Word
Docs
Hits
pt
22K
36.6K
67
398
533
section
23.3K
38.3K
2
23.7K
33.4K
Related Threads
Pt 67 section 2 problem 11
Why is the answer e?? I thought the best was a. I don't understand why sulfur 33 is rarely found. I thought what they had found were HIGHER THAN NORM…
PT 28 SECTION 2 GAME 2
Hey anyone down to go through this game. According to the information out there it’s seen as one of the most challenging grouping games. I completed …
PT. 19 Question 12 Section 2
This question was included in the weaken drill and I can't seem to figure out the reason as to why D was the correct answer. Someone please help!
PT. 22 Section 2 Question 22
Clearly I'm having a hard time mapping out logic... Can someone please explain the correct answer? Also any tips on how to improve mapping out logic …
PT 2, Oct 1991, Sec 2, #21
Hello,<br /> <br /> I don't understand why D is the correct answer. I chose C. Could someone please explain why the right answer is right and the w…
PT 70, Section 2, Question 6
Hi,<br /> On this question I narrowed it down to C and D. But even though I've read a couple explanations on it, I don't see why D is glaringly wron…
PT 66 Section 2 Question 13: Brooks: I'm unhappy in my....
Okay, this question has got me. I'm BRing it, and I honestly cannot rule one answer out with confidence. That never happens. A, C, and D all seem pre…
PT 73 Section 3 Game 2
Hey all, can someone explain to me why BOTH X and Y don’t have to be before Z? <br /> For example, for question number 8, JY said for answer choice …
June Test-Takers, Week of Feb 8th: Tues (PT 45), Thurs (PT 46), Thurs (PT73), and Sat ( PT 46)
June Test Takers! Great work last week, gang! Because there was demand for an earlier BR session, we’re now also doing Wednesday at 12pm EST. Please …
Question: Cambridge PT 5th Section (PT-A)?
I just found a copy of PT74 I bought from CambridgeLSAT awhile ago. It looks like it's got 5 sections, with the 3rd section labeled as (PT-A) on the …
Related Searches
pt 18 section 2
pt 68 section 2
pt 21 section 2
pt 52 section 2
pt 51 section 2
pt 27 section question 2
pt 67 section 2 problem 18
pt 67 section 2 problem 21
pt 67 section 2 21
lr pt 67 section 2
Title Search
@title beer
Word 'beer' in title
User Search
@user admin
Only posts by Admin
Text Search
@body beer
Word 'beer' in the text
Phrase Search
"Hello World"
Exact phrase match
Exclude Terms
car -red
Search cars that are not red
"Or" Searches
honda | bmw
'honda' or 'bmw' results
Multi-Field
@(title,body) hello
Both contain 'hello'
WildCard
hond* civ*
Match all with an astrix
Combination
@title bmw @user admin
See more
supported syntax examples
Search Again :: Adv Search
1000 results in 0.013s
<
1
…
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
>
Uh oh, serious coffee issue
So im one of those perpetual starbucks dwellers. I cannot study anywhere else. I just started tracking how much coffee i drink a day....its insane. …
... pee about 10 min into
section
2
.
>
Good ...
OlamHafuch
August 2017
General
PT
81 BR Sessions with J.Y.
Hey 7Sagers, I'm leading BR calls for PT 81 (June 2017 LSAT). I'm holding 12 sessions total. 4 for each of LR 1, LR 2, and RC. Each session will …
Section
2
has 25 questions.
OlamHafuch
August 2017
Study Groups
PT
81 BR Sessions with J.Y.
Hey 7Sagers, I'm leading BR calls for PT 81 (June 2017 LSAT). I'm holding 12 sessions total. 4 for each of LR 1, LR 2, and RC. Each session will …
> @uhinberg said:
>
Section
2
has 25 questions.
Thanks!
sakox010
August 2017
Study Groups
PT
81 BR Sessions with J.Y.
Hey 7Sagers, I'm leading BR calls for PT 81 (June 2017 LSAT). I'm holding 12 sessions total. 4 for each of LR 1, LR 2, and RC. Each session will …
> @sakox010 said:
> > @uhinberg said:
> >
Section
2
has 25 questions.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
Section
2
actually had 26 questions. First question about the marsupial.
rafaelito
August 2017
Study Groups
What's the deal with LG from
PT
18
In JYs video explanations, he says that the last 2 aren't applicable to the modern lsat. Given what the exam has been up to in recent years on logic …
In the comment
section
of the PT12.S2.Game ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-12-
section
-
2
-game-4/#comment-19044
akistotle
September 2017
Logic Games
Mistaking sufficiency for necessity vs mistaking necessity for sufficiency
I'm a bit confused about the technical differences between the errors of (1) mistaking sufficiency or necessity and (2) mistaking necessity for suffi…
... mistake. That question is:
Pt
51
Section
1 Question 20. That is ... to do beyond or BR
PT
56.
In my ...
BinghamtonDave
September 2017
Logical Reasoning
PT67.S4.Q08 - if the burden of a proposed policy change
Hello! I was hoping to get some clarification on this question. So clearly our right answer should link the reintroduction of rock salt to a dispr…
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-
67
-
section
-4-question-08/
...
akistotle
September 2017
Logical Reasoning
'Best of J.Y. moments:' J.Y.'s video explanations that just make your day.
I just came across [this explanation](https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-18-section-4-question-18/) and I realized how much J.Y.'s humor has ha…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-34-
section
-
2
-question-12/)
This ...
jennw065
September 2017
General
PT58.S2.P3 - law and tangible object theory
One of the RC passages in Sept. 2009 was about copyright and tangible object theory (TOT). In general, the passage goes like this (working from memor…
Hmm. I looked up your question and found PT58.S2.P3's RC, which is **October** 2009.
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-58-
section
-
2
-passage-3-passage/
inactive
September 2017
Reading Comprehension
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion Thread
Hey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... logic games rules in Game #
2
section
2
. Had to erase all my ... 't get to the last
2
games. Killed my vibe for ...
zachary.findling
September 2017
September 2017 LSAT
<
1
…
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
>